theebs;2028535 said:
A. I dont want pacman anywhere near our team.
B. Where did I say chad jonson was a criminal?
You didn't suggest that he was a criminal. I was pointing out that he wasn't and didn't have near the issues that Pacman has. Coupled that with his overall talent, it's not an idea you can completely dismiss if the Bengals were offering him up in a trade.
I just dont think chad johnson is the missing link. .
It's not about Chad being the missing link, it's that the team has a need and that if the Bengals were to offer him up, he could fill that need.
Teams take a natural course to winning. It takes time. There is no instant winning solution. This team has put in all the time and the ups and downs. They have learned how to lose and how to win. They have the right type of players and they are a team right on the edge.
That's a huge assumption there. They learned how to win a little bit, but there is still a question of do they know how to win when it matters. We don't know that yet.
No need to upset the apple cart and throw in chad johnsons antics. No matter what is said, at some point johnson will cause problems directly or indirectly. there is no way owens and johnson co-exist.
They're friends, so anything is possible.
Now roy williams I am all for. He is a level headed guy for the most part and a team player. He keeps to himself and you always hear about his off the field charity work. He is the kind of player that would fit right in on this roster. Nobody would need to watch what they say about him or how they talk about him. He would become just one of the guys instantly.
The things you speak positively about Roy, Chad does also. Roy Williams is a good player, but he has the same diva mentality. It's just stifled in Detroit, because they've had no success. He's also had more injuries.
The only thing I like about johnson is he is a vertical threat, we have an offnse built around deep passing plays and we are aggressive at all times of the game, he would fit right into that. I just dont think there is any chance he fits in with this locker room. He would be a headache from day 1. He is in his 30s. No need to go down that road.
He's right at 30 and his age is his only drawback. Outside of that, I just don't share the same concerns. I think we (fans) worry more about lockerroom issues than the players.
Nothing wrong with developing a young wr. We have the staff to teach young players now and staying young is always a good thing.
I agree with this. Getting a vet WR doesn't prevent the 'boys from drafting one either.
