Irvin to have 7am Wed press conference - Video in post 113

Status
Not open for further replies.
the media:
guilty-gif-22.gif
all..with 0 evidence of guilt...
 
Rayman70 said:
the media:
guilty-gif-22.gif
all..with 0 evidence of guilt...
Click to expand...
sadly its been that way for some time

I remember someone saying like 20 years ago after being fried in the media and then it being shown it was all false asking this

"Where do I go to regain my reputation?"
 
phildadon86 said:
Its not just this post. Its how you have acted this entire time. Its like you want to see the guy burn.
Click to expand...
No. If you've seen my posts in all the threads I've examined the evidence that's out there and parsed it critically. No different than I operate on football matters. I call 'em like I see 'em. Here involves a bit more speculation of course. The only people with issues with that are the pro-Irvin/anti-accuser types who are locked in to the result they want to see happen. Again, no different than football matters when I chime in there.
 
Dallas Morning News said it's at 10:30 am. Couldn't read the whole article since I don't subscribe but that was in the snippet you could see.
 
MarcusRock said:
No. If you've seen my posts in all the threads I've examined the evidence that's out there and parsed it critically. No different than I operate on football matters. I call 'em like I see 'em. Here involves a bit more speculation of course. The only people with issues with that are the pro-Irvin/anti-accuser types who are locked in to the result they want to see happen. Again, no different than football matters when I chime in there.
Click to expand...
You mean how you were objective about the Zeke suspension compared to the Ray Rice/John Brown situations?

Right.
 
phildadon86 said:
You mean how you were objective about the Zeke suspension compared to the Ray Rice/John Brown situations?

Right.
Click to expand...
I never chimed in on those because I didn't read up on all the facts on those situations to properly comment so show me the posts I've made on any of those topics. There are none. So look at you here making false accusations about things you've never even seen. Overreactive is what I said; and I was right.
 
MarcusRock said:
I never chimed in on those because I didn't read up on all the facts on those situations to properly comment so show me the posts I've made on any of those topics. There are none. So look at you here making false accusations about things you've never even seen. Overreactive is what I said; and I was right.
Click to expand...
You have literally commented on both. To me directly. On here.

So enough with the playing victim.
 
MarcusRock said:
No. If you've seen my posts in all the threads I've examined the evidence that's out there and parsed it critically. No different than I operate on football matters. I call 'em like I see 'em. Here involves a bit more speculation of course. The only people with issues with that are the pro-Irvin/anti-accuser types who are locked in to the result they want to see happen. Again, no different than football matters when I chime in there.
Click to expand...
That is most definitely not how you have come across with your many many many posts in the various threads.

Just saying.
 
MarcusRock said:
Then show me. I don't venture into discussions where I don't have a grasp on all the details.
Click to expand...
I am not going back in time years to prove that I am right.

You fully supported the Zeke suspension and went on to try and discredit anyone who said it was unfair considering the Rice and Brown debacles. This was also when people were suggesting a bias towards Cowboys players and suspensions.
 
Vtwin said:
That is most definitely not how you have come across with your many many many posts in the various threads.

Just saying.
Click to expand...
Like I said, the only types that have issues with a critical look at the evidence are those that don't like that it was Irvin's side of the story being looked at. Because it's only been his side out there. So that's the reason for any trigger response. Not my concern.
 
phildadon86 said:
I am not going back in time years to prove that I am right.

You fully supported the Zeke suspension and went on to try and discredit anyone who said it was unfair considering the Rice and Brown debacles. This was also when people were suggesting a bias towards Cowboys players and suspensions.
Click to expand...
Yes, the typical, "I don't have time ..." response when asked to produce proof of an accusation. I almost wrote that into my last post because I knew it was coming. Thanks for confirming.
 
MarcusRock said:
Like I said, the only types that have issues with a critical look at the evidence are those that don't like that it was Irvin's side of the story being looked at. Because it's only been his side out there. So that's the reason for any trigger response. Not my concern.
Click to expand...
You have no idea what motivates another's thoughts.

This is pure defensive posturing using a conjured up strawman. Arguably the weakest type of strawman, in my opinion.
 
Diehardblues said:
I thought this was scheduled for 10am?

I guess Reid is referring to Pacific time ?
Click to expand...
I wonder if we won't see it on any usual NFL-oriented networks due to the fact that what is revealed may just put them in a bad light. In other words, if clearly innocent, NFL Network and ESPN failed to back their employee, and acted prematurely and fumbled the decision to keep Irvin off the air based on bad info.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

... and 90 more.
Total: 4,404 (members: 190, guests: 4,214)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,188
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top