Can't argue with you there. Completion percentage and QBR don't always show an accurate measure of the player.
He's always the same player but Amari makes him look better. I watch the games but I guess not like you Dakstorians that think this average guy has improved so much.
"Dude was 4th rounder for a reason", then mentions a 6th rounder and 3rd rounder. No one knows what his ceiling is.
This we don't have anyone else business is junk. That means we have to trade up to pick a potential replacement that may fail. It isn't that hard. Now whether that pick so successful or not is another story but Dak isn't good enough to worry about that.
Bro, go back and see how I used to feel about Dak. I was called a Dak hater many-a-time. I couldn't stand the guy.
Yes, that's to say temper your expectations, but obviously with your attempt to be edgy, you missed the point. To compare him to already elites using obscure stats when he doesn't deserve to be in the same convo as those guys is what makes homers, well, homers. Continue to be edgy though, as if it adds anything to the discussion.
Seriously. Only Dak can't have weapons. Even Brady and Rodgers have had weapons and strong O-Lines.
To be honest, he should be compared to the guys getting their second contracts. Jimmy G, Wentz and Goff. He's definitely in that category.
This. Plus, the Jones/McClay FO have kept the team afloat where we are never in position to rebuild with top picks. That is to our fortune or misfortune. We can definitely win with Dak, and is deserving of a second contract. He would command top $ in the open market, whether people like it or not.
He is the best option we have but I'm not out here advocating for Cooper Rush so I don't get your point on that. I'm a believer first chance you get to replace him you do or let him walk like Washington did with Cousins. He's on that same level as a QB IMO and of you think different ok cool. I'm not trying to change minds. Who said Dak or any QB didn't need talent to be successful? I didn't. There is a difference between needing talent and when you don't have top line talent your play looks like poo and that's Dak unfortunately. I think that difference is where people like to get disingenuous at because I've never said a player needs no talent but if Dak is as good as some claim why can't he up average WR levels?
I'm not scarred of that but it seems like as long as something is average you're ok with that. I rather fail trying to improve than just being cool being average with a low chance of big time success.
I get Cooper deal done and then take a chance on franchising Prescott next year I'd like to see more of this year and on how he responds when the going gets tough I'm not bashing him I'm just not convinced that he's the total package worth that kind of money
You are another one living in the past. Minshew, Allen and Rudolph are all mid round or later picks who have stepped in and are playing as good or better than Dak... and that’s just this year. It’s not that hard to find competent QBs who can stand in a pocket for 10 seconds and throw to wide open receivers. Dak was a great player in his current contract. We should be trying to find the next Dak, not giving the current one a zillion bucks.
Yessir. As mentioned above, we haven't had the luxury of top picks to go through a true rebuild. We rebuilt on the fly through the 8-8 years, changed the O-Line and switched offensive weapons. Our defense is not lined up with top ten talent like the 49ers though. The window is open and we need to try to extend it as long as possible. With a Dak level guy, we need an aggressive FO like the Rams did in acquiring star players. We did it last year with Cooper.
