Is WR Michael Gallup still a lead feature type?

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,093
Reaction score
15,955
Let me start by saying I love Gallup. He can put up low tier #1 numbers if hes next to a #1 in todays NFL, but he cannot be your best receiver. He is going to make eye popping plays. He will come up clutch, but hes also a chest catcher which limits some of the routes hes able to run, and it limits how comfortable a QB will feel throwing to him in certain situations.

Good thing is he will never have to be our best WR here. Cooper and Lamb will be that. I think he is good as a 3rd WR. He would exposed if some team wanted him as their top WR ala Laurent Robinson. I see Gallup as a tad better version of Terrence Williams. Both body catch way too often and drop balls.
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,750
Reaction score
14,587
Good thing is he will never have to be our best WR here. Cooper and Lamb will be that. I think he is good as a 3rd WR. He would exposed if some team wanted him as their top WR ala Laurent Robinson. I see Gallup as a tad better version of Terrence Williams. Both body catch way too often and drop balls.

" tad better version than Terrence Williams ?" … Ii think Gallup is waaay better TWill ever was. Despite Gallups' inconsistencies, he's not the disappearance act TWill was.
- TWill body catched a lot more than Gallup does
- Twill was never the deep ball treat Gallup is
- TWill could not out-jump and out-physical the opposing CBs the way Gallup does
- Twill was never the open field runner after the catch that Gallup is.
- Both issues with dropped passes

Little wonder why TWill is not even in the NFL now, and no team has come knocking at his door to acquire his services.
 

clff15701

Well-Known Member
Messages
606
Reaction score
1,137
Gallup can’t do what coop does. Coop will still be good when Gallup isn’t because of his route running
 

Redline360

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,629
Reaction score
5,013
Gallup never really morphed into that WR1 type. Probably one of the better WR2 in the league
 

ondaedg

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,891
Reaction score
3,034
Gallup is a down field WR, especially with Cooper and Lamb in the offense. We don't have a QB who can throw it downfield with any consistency.

The drops are no different than they ever have been.

Yep. Gallup isn’t going to blow anyone away with crisp cuts and speedy outs. He is best at posting up defenders on downfield passes especially in 1:1 coverage. Cooper helps him by drawing attention.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
51,429
Reaction score
96,446
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
He seems to have a really limited number of routes. Either quick WR screen or something long. He should still be a productive player with Dak throwing to him but I honestly would have traded him for a 2nd after getting Lamb. A 2nd should be able to land a cheap defensive starter.
His routes are likely limited only by the plays drawn up.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
51,429
Reaction score
96,446
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Good thing is he will never have to be our best WR here. Cooper and Lamb will be that. I think he is good as a 3rd WR. He would exposed if some team wanted him as their top WR ala Laurent Robinson. I see Gallup as a tad better version of Terrence Williams. Both body catch way too often and drop balls.
I honestly don't see the body catching very often. In fact, that may be when he drops it most often. It seems sometimes like he needs a challenge, because he catches a lot of very difficult balls.
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,388
Reaction score
14,797
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I like Gallup but he's not a #1 receiver who can beat double teams. He is a downfield guy who can beat single coverage and put up big numbers. Right now it is tough to get Gallup going when the QB gets so little time but he needs to take advantage of the opportunities he does get and not drop those passes like last week.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,003
Reaction score
28,625
" tad better version than Terrence Williams ?" … Ii think Gallup is waaay better TWill ever was. Despite Gallups' inconsistencies, he's not the disappearance act TWill was.
- TWill body catched a lot more than Gallup does
- Twill was never the deep ball treat Gallup is
- TWill could not out-jump and out-physical the opposing CBs the way Gallup does
- Twill was never the open field runner after the catch that Gallup is.
- Both issues with dropped passes

Little wonder why TWill is not even in the NFL now, and no team has come knocking at his door to acquire his services.
more like poor mans Dez Bryant..that how i see Gallup..
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,332
Reaction score
21,337
I was really hoping once we got better QB play and getting the balls more to the receivers, that Gallup
would step up and make his presence felt.

-We've seen Cooper come up with some key catches and staying involved in the offense.
-We've seen rookie CeeDee Lamb emerge mightily to greatly impact the game
-But is Michael Gallup in somewhat of a slump -that includes issues with drops ?

McCarthy made comments that he thought Gallup had No.1 lead WR traits, but while he can have his
moments, i tend to wonder if the inconsistencies in his game such as the untimely drops and disappearing acts may still limit him from being a No1.1 type.

The game that Dak got hurt and Gallup got the big catches on the final drive for the win was Peak Gallup. We should have traded him while he still looked like a potential #1, given his numbers from last year.

Most #2s are mirages. They get better numbers because teams worry about the #1s and take their chances with the #2s. Give them the attention of a #1, and their production and *efficiency* plummet. Harper was not a 1. But he got paid like one. Terrance's numbers looked like great efficiency, but the league wasn't fooled there, and he totally washed out.

Gallup has been bypassed by Cooper and Lamb, two legit ones, and will have to fight to clearly stay head and shoulders above CWilson. Come next year, with limited targets after Cooper, Lamb, and Jarwin, the debate on Gallup will be whether he's a #2 or #3. A little unfair, as he's a legit #2, but that's it.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,003
Reaction score
28,625
The game that Dak got hurt and Gallup got the big catches on the final drive for the win was Peak Gallup. We should have traded him while he still looked like a potential #1, given his numbers from last year.

Most #2s are mirages. They get better numbers because teams worry about the #1s and take their chances with the #2s. Give them the attention of a #1, and their production and *efficiency* plummet. Harper was not a 1. But he got paid like one. Terrance's numbers looked like great efficiency, but the league wasn't fooled there, and he totally washed out.

Gallup has been bypassed by Cooper and Lamb, two legit ones, and will have to fight to clearly stay head and shoulders above CWilson. Come next year, with limited targets after Cooper, Lamb, and Jarwin, the debate on Gallup will be whether he's a #2 or #3. A little unfair, as he's a legit #2, but that's it.
:laugh::lmao2: really , seriously? that just not a well thought out statement..uggh

AC disappeared in about half his games last year so Gallup allowed to have some down games..Gallup came pretty Close to outperforming AC last season, so not sure what you are smoking but Lambs had bad games as well..

guess we should have traded Dak while he was hot, now he damaged goods..
 

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,332
Reaction score
21,337
Gallup is a down field WR, especially with Cooper and Lamb in the offense. We don't have a QB who can throw it downfield with any consistency.

The drops are no different than they ever have been.

Gallup is only a downfield threat because teams would rather take their chances with him downfield, given the threat of Cooper opposite.

Just ok size, speed, catch radius, vertical, competition for the ball. His deep threat is a product of the situation he found himself in. He's a better Terrance that way.
 

Londonboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,832
Reaction score
10,399
There isn't one professional athlete that doesn't go through slumps. It's the nature of the game!

Take Wentzie for example,
oh wait -------> runs
I wouldn't take him if You threw in a nest of tables and a new sofa and promised to upsize Your font.
 
Last edited:

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,832
Reaction score
26,533
How could a guy with a 1970 Topps Bob Lilly avatar be wrong? He couldn't. Agree with all of it.
Autographed lol
Cool guy
He let me wear his super bowl ring
It was a little large, on my thumb
But today he’d be a little guy in the nfl
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,446
Reaction score
29,629
Autographed lol
Cool guy
He let me wear his super bowl ring
It was a little large, on my thumb
But today he’d be a little guy in the nfl
Bob Lilly is Cowboys royalty as far as I am concerned. There is a recent YouTube video interview when he turned 80. Seemed like a great guy.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,736
Reaction score
23,269
Gallup doesn't throw the balls or call the route combinations and his talent hasn't suddenly dropped off, he's just in more of a sharing situation. He definitely still has #1 potential, but high level #2 is probably more likely. I'd have no problem moving on from Cooper and rolling with Gallup and Lamb.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,011
Reaction score
23,849
Gallup is a down field WR, especially with Cooper and Lamb in the offense. We don't have a QB who can throw it downfield with any consistency.

The drops are no different than they ever have been.
I believe Gallup would be more effective if used more like Carolina uses Curtis Samuel.
 
Top