Montana would never have been as heralded as he was if he arrived in Oakland with their "bombs away" type of passing game. Montana was accurate, but he did not have a rocket launcher of an arm. The dink and dunk style of the West Coast offense was the perfect scenario for him. It causes me to wonder if there have been quarterbacks who would have been much better than the career we saw because they went to a team that didn't have the right components to feature that players talent.
The immediate player that comes to mind is Romo. What could he have been with Denver's defense a few years ago? Would the league be talking about Romo in the same breath as Brady?
Another aspect is Prescott's ability to run. While Russell Wilson is the QB that comes to mind when discussing a running quarterback. And Prescott is not truly a run first. I think Steve Young is a good example of what Dak is not. I never thought Young was a great quarterback. I believed his running was more along the lines of him making the decision and thinking of himself as a weapon. He had a great deal of talent around him. Yet he was sand lot in that he looked for the place to bail out on a play.
Dak hangs tough and understands the passing game is the most important aspect. The tell-tale sign for me is when he leaks out of the pocket and moves laterally looking down field. He is looking for that spot to connect with a receiver for a gain. Not run the ball.
Not sure how to prove this, but I don't believe teams spy Dak because of his running. Perhaps the fact his run plays are designed for the most part.
But it is these very same plays as illustrated in the videos of this article which indicate to me he is more than a bus driver.
Now let me say I think all quarterbacks are bus drivers in games. They throw to the open guy on designed plays. That is why there are options other than the first options on a passing play. Like a bus driver, the quarterback makes the right turn at the right time. And they all do that, from Rodgers to Romo to Brady.
But where the play making ability, which is what I assume most fans believe is the hallmark of the quarterback that doesn't drive the bus, Prescott maneuvers, moves, slides and finds the right angle for big gains while finding the clean spot to articulate a pass that was not drawn up in the playbook before the snap of the ball.
So here is the real question.
Will Dak's ability to manage his game, throwing from the planned spot to the target, yet being able to change the play as it progresses by moving, causes the defense's focus to alter enough for the running game to flourish?
What made Aikman special was his accuracy and cannon of an arm. As he stood tall in the pocket, teams would be back pedaling to cover his receivers. Then Dallas would hand the ball to Emmitt on the lead draw and he was in the second level before the defense could recover.
I think this could be a yard stick on where Dak is if the opposing team becomes accutely concerned about his passing enough to be fooled by what is essentially the polar opposite of the play action pass.
To me that is when you know other teams respect this guy because of his arm.