It’s Time to Stop Underrating Dak Prescott

[Alexander]

People pointing to the Denver game and acting like no other franchise QB had a bad game when the oline wasn't performing.

Like it or not, it is the only time he has been put into that situation.

Until there are more to evaluate, that is all that there is.

Maybe he is the next big thing. And we will get a real taste of what he is over the next six games.

I don't see the sin in wanting to see it first.

 

[THEHEREAFTER]

Dak is certainly a franchise QB, and his control of the game, passing-wise and running-wise is incredible valuable. He rarely commits turnovers.

With that said, it's also apparent that he doesn't, at least right now, have the throwing ability(especially for longer passes) that someone like Romo had. He also has the benefit of excellent protection and a top-notch RB. That doesn't necessarily take away from Dak, but it makes it easier to have a comfortable passing game.

I think he's still one of the better QBs in the league, but his throwing ability isn't quite there yet. And that's fine. He's a 2nd year QB who was drafted in the 4th round, we struck gold.

This stretch without Zeke(assuming it fully stands), will definitely require Dak to step it up a bit if we want to stay in playoff contention. I'm looking forward to seeing that.

I get your points but you're still dismissing his vision and his "feel" for the game. You can't measure confidence, leadership and simply WHERE to go with the football and when. QB's must read the defense, take what's there and also know when to throw a dart in a tight window. Eluding pressure etc.. The problem with some of your analysis is that it suggests that you can put anyone back there in Dak's situation and produce the same results. This is not some linear plug in and out situation. I do agree with the fact that Dak is growing still... Is Dak an advanced thrower of the likes of Rodgers, Breese, Brady... of course not yet... but he's a good fit for we're looking to do and he brings other intangibles to the table like his toughness and mobility.

 

[Alexander]

One of the best defenses in the league over the last 5 years didn’t have anything to do with Seattle’s wins?

That’s odd.

Wilson also had Marshawn Lynch going beast mode when they won a title and when they went back to the Super Bowl.

I am talking about right now. Not the past.

He is in a situation this year with no run game and no OL. And he is still performing at a high level capable of elevating his team to a win.

 

[Zman5]

Dak has the OL and the run game but Wentz also has a good OL and a defense. People fail to mention this when talking about Wentz.

Mike Shanahan made a comment today that having a good defense is as important to a QB as having a good run game.
His comment was made when asked who was better between Dak and Wentz. BTW, he thought Dak was little ahead but thinks they will both have great careers.

 

[Outlaw Heroes]

I agree.

Heads will explode.

 

[DallasCowboys2080]

He has always been underrated. I remember when when he first started in nfl.... "but it's just preseason" and then regular season came... "but it's not a real defense" than he did well against that than "but zeke elliot" than It turned into "sophomore slump" or "tape is out"... now its......

 

[vicjagger]

http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl...has-been-just-as-good/ar-BBENyGO?ocid=DELLDHP

 

[Garrettop]

Next it will be "that oline makes any runner look good so he still has a run game". Always an excuse. It's a test until it is passed and then it isn't really a test.

 

[Alexander]

Well let's look at the GB game in the playoffs, where the team fell way behind, and Dak brought the team back to tie game. The running game was of little use when mounting the comeback. Or are you saying that the mere presence of Zeke on the field, even if on the sidelines was all it takes.

Wait, so Elliott did not participate during the comeback and it was all Prescott?

After the 28-13 in that game, Elliott contributed 64 of the 139 yards on both series to tie the game.

 

[TwoDeep3]

And Elliott was effectively taken out of the game and we saw the results. But bonus points for you for indicating the error in my statement.

So are you maintaining that is Elliott is not in the game, this team cannot run the ball?

 

[Alexander]

Next it will be "that oline makes any runner look good so he still has a run game". Always an excuse.

You won't see that from me.

 

[Alexander]

So are you maintaining that is Elliott is not in the game, this team cannot run the ball?

This post from you is alarming.

I have never seen you post something this inane, nonsensical and completely missing the point.

 

[THEHEREAFTER]

There's also some give and take with anyone who's not the elite of the elite (Brady Rodgers etc.)... some of the big time downfield passing qb's will kill you with inaccuracy, display horrible leadership in spots, recklessly attempt to improvise and put their team in bad situations and of course turning the ball over. One of Dak's best qualities imo is playing WINNING football. He runs the offense properly and keeps the offense on schedule. He doesn't make MISTAKES that destroy your probability of winning. He's clutch and steps up in big moments. The problem is a lot of these qualities are immeasurable and he makes them look EASY.

 

[Fletch]

Like it or not, it is the only time he has been put into that situation.

Until there are more to evaluate, that is all that there is.

Maybe he is the next big thing. And we will get a real taste of what he is over the next six games.

I don't see the sin in wanting to see it first.

I dunno. Thought we saw it vs Philthy at Home last year, the Minny game last year, Divisional game last year vs GB. I think we’ve seen it, but some fans choose to pick the games to fit certain criteria.

 

[Alexander]

Dak has the OL and the run game but Wentz also has a good OL and a defense. People fail to mention this when talking about Wentz.

I have never understood this concept that the fact a team has a good defense makes a QB more accurate or more capable.

Wait it doesn't.

Ws and Ls is the only place that factors.

 

[dogunwo]

Well, if you believe in that kind of thing, only QBs to win the SB as a Dallas starter wore a jersey number with a multiple of the number 4.

 

[Alexander]

I dunno. Thought we saw it vs Philthy at Home last year, the Minny game last year, Divisional game last year vs GB. I think we’ve seen it, but some fans choose to pick the games to fit certain criteria.

There is no picking and choosing.

In every Prescott start, Elliott has had two games below 80 yards rushing. Two.

And what were the outcomes of those games, boys and girls?

 

[zrinkill]

But while the team will surely miss Elliott’s big-play ability during his suspension, Prescott is capable of carrying this offense.

I agree.

https://encrypted-tbn0.***NOT-ALLOWED***/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRFO273kl93mMoijSQmXk6_ywjiSRVpsT05unpcAFePEZexGPhsrQ

 

[CODE_BLUE56]

I get your points but you're still dismissing his vision and his "feel" for the game. You can't measure confidence, leadership and simply WHERE to go with the football and when. QB's must read the defense, take what's there and also know when to throw a dart in a tight window. Eluding pressure etc..

I don't disagree with this assessment. He's an incredibly good decision maker,and certainly can make plays with his feet(one of the best roll-out passers in the NFL, if not the best). My point of contention is that he doesn't quite have the ability to throw in tighter windows for longer pass plays. He's not awful by any stretch, but that's partly why there isn't a great synergy between Dak and Dez, and Romo has pointed that out.

The problem with some of your analysis is that it suggests that you can put anywhere back there in Dak's situation and produce the same results. This is not some linear plug in and out analysis.

I never said that, nor necessarily suggested that. I'm saying that having an excellent O line and RB benefit a QB's comfort and ability in the pocket. That doesn't mean Tom Savage or someone other Joe Schmoe QB would be doing as well as Dak, put into that situation. But we have to provide a little context.

I do agree with the fact that Dak is growing still... Is Dak an advanced thrower of the likes of Rodgers, Breese, Brady... of course not yet... but he's a good fit for we're looking to do and he brings other intangibles to the table like his toughness and mobility.

This was my point. We agree.

 

[TwoDeep3]

This post from you is alarming.

I have never seen you post something this inane, nonsensical and completely missing the point.

Then enlighten me. You position is without Elliott the game is on Dak. Is that correct? Then you use the Denver game as a sampling of what happens when it is on Dak alone because Dallas could not run the ball.

You appear to have left out the defense allowed their quarterback to play like Brady that day.

~~But here is a place where I must introduce a separate subject. The fact Dallas scores and continues to score is a pressure the opposing offense has to deal with. You saw it in the KC game. That Hail Larry thing is discounted and them taking the lead is subtracted because of that fluke play. The Dallas defense is aided by the fact the Dallas offense cashes touchdowns. This is important. It keeps balance between two teams. In the Denver game, if the Dallas offense had been moving the ball, they would not have been stacking 9 in the box. Their game plan would have changed. ~~

Are you suggesting without Elliott grinding out big gains, Dak will either step up, or be unmasked?

I agree this will be a game where Dak needs to win it. But then Morris could just follow the gaping holes and hang 125 on 27 carries and Dallas wins.