We're not as Romo dependent as we have been. Weeden just made it look that way.
a good qb can only carry a team but so far.....
I disagree, because it doesnt matter who you put behind tony really...but it does matter who is in front of murray.
We can debate the relative importance of Romo or Murray all day, but I think all would agree that this team is at it's best when both are on the field.
You are right to an extent this is as much Tony's team as it is Murray's. What has made us successful this season is our ability to avoid being one dimensional. We force teams to "pick their poision" wihout romo defenses can stack the box and dare us to throw on them and without Murray defenses would just focus on coverage. This is the most complete team in the NFL IMO and that means we are only complete with all of our startersI was really hoping this season was different. It's not. We had a chance to beat a good team without Tony and show that we've learned other ways to win. Our running game is very good but the reason it was able to have so many carries and yards is because Tony converted 3rd downs and made teams pay by extending plays with his mobility and ability to find the open man. No doubt in my mind we win yesterday with Tony in there. Defense gave us a quick 7-0 lead and the run game really wasn't bad it just needed balance.
So Tony get well QUICK please we need you if we're going to have any shot at postseason.
as i said in another thread...all the haters that said this was murray's team found out that murray needs tony.
I think it would be more accurate to say that Romo and Murray need each other.
as i said in another thread...all the haters that said this was murray's team found out that murray needs tony.
You don't run to score, you run to open up the pass. We are better this year, because we run play-action. If you run to score, you simply won't win.
It's a passing league.
It actually makes me wonder if the Cowboys have a built an offensive philosophy (run heavy offense) more suited for the 1990s than today.
The rules are SO TILTED towards passing it's ridiculous.
This is how bad it is:
It wasn't long ago that 80+ QB ratings was considered the rubicon for average QB play. Now the entire league is above 80 and a pure 90 QB rating is just average.
- 7 quarterbacks have a QB rating of 100+
- 19 quarterbacks have a QB rating of 90+
- 28 quarterbacks have a QB rating of 80+
Realistically, you score how ever the defense allows you. Take what's given. It's been the motto this year but, Weeden just doesn't have the tools and consistency to be an NFL QB.
as i said in another thread...all the haters that said this was murray's team found out that murray needs tony.
This is true. My comments were mainly about this idea about 'balance', as if one has to fulfill some mathematical equation to score successfully. It's about fooling the defense in the end.
No matter what the ball always travels faster than a guy running, so from that perspective it's easier to move the chains.