Phrozen Phil
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,994
- Reaction score
- 91
Hos, you're having wayyy too much fun with this. I don't think even Jerry, in his wildest dreams would be doing this kind of dealing. Lots of fun, though.
You gotta admit, the picture of Gomez Addams wild eyed and grinning as he blows up the trains is classic.Phrozen Phil;3275786 said:Hos, you're having wayyy too much fun with this. I don't think even Jerry, in his wildest dreams would be doing this kind of dealing. Lots of fun, though.
ykc;3275854 said:I doubt crayton has any value for trading other than late 7th rounder
I don't agree with that at all.ykc;3275854 said:I doubt crayton has any value for trading other than late 7th rounder
ethiostar;3275883 said:Am I the only who want to hold on to Crayton?
He's not a #1 receiver but we don't need him to be. He's been very consistent in the last few years.
2009----------37 rec 622 Yds 5 tds
2008----------39 rec 550 yds 4 tds
2007----------50 rec 697 yds 7 tds
2006----------36 rec 516 yds 4 tds
When given the opportunity he has delivered.
We have Austin and Roy as #1 and #2 wrs, assuming that Roy develops a better chemistry with Romo (knock on wood). I really like Ogletree but i still need to see him perform a bit more.
Witten and Crayton have been the most consistent receivers for this team in last 4 years. I don't understand the rush to get rid of Crayton.
ethiostar;3275883 said:Am I the only who wants to hold on to Crayton?
He's not a #1 receiver but we don't need him to be. He's been very consistent in the last few years.
2009----------37 rec 622 Yds 5 tds
2008----------39 rec 550 yds 4 tds
2007----------50 rec 697 yds 7 tds
2006----------36 rec 516 yds 4 tds
When given the opportunity he has delivered.
We have Austin and Roy as #1 and #2 wrs, assuming that Roy develops a better chemistry with Romo (knock on wood). I really like Ogletree but i still need to see him perform a bit more.
Witten and Crayton have been the most consistent receivers for this team in last 4 years. I don't understand the rush to get rid of Crayton.
casmith07;3276171 said:No, you're not. Patrick Crayton is a very good receiver for the role he plays. However, if you can move him and get an identical player at a cheaper price, I'd do it.
Bob Sacamano;3276173 said:Crayton is pretty cheap right now