It's Only Mock Believe

Hos, you're having wayyy too much fun with this. I don't think even Jerry, in his wildest dreams would be doing this kind of dealing. Lots of fun, though.:D
 
Phrozen Phil;3275786 said:
Hos, you're having wayyy too much fun with this. I don't think even Jerry, in his wildest dreams would be doing this kind of dealing. Lots of fun, though.:D
You gotta admit, the picture of Gomez Addams wild eyed and grinning as he blows up the trains is classic.

Don't speak French or I'll kiss your arm. ;)
 
Wow. That's a heck of a draft. It's really too darn bad that it is only a fantasy draft in your mind. If you could somehow figure how to bend the universe to your will and make this happen that would be great.
 
I doubt crayton has any value for trading other than late 7th rounder
 
ykc;3275854 said:
I doubt crayton has any value for trading other than late 7th rounder

Am I the only who wants to hold on to Crayton?

He's not a #1 receiver but we don't need him to be. He's been very consistent in the last few years.

2009----------37 rec 622 Yds 5 tds
2008----------39 rec 550 yds 4 tds
2007----------50 rec 697 yds 7 tds
2006----------36 rec 516 yds 4 tds

When given the opportunity he has delivered.

We have Austin and Roy as #1 and #2 wrs, assuming that Roy develops a better chemistry with Romo (knock on wood). I really like Ogletree but i still need to see him perform a bit more.

Witten and Crayton have been the most consistent receivers for this team in last 4 years. I don't understand the rush to get rid of Crayton.
 
Losing veteran players and adding that many rookies sets this team back. Right now, the window is open, no one knows for how long, so lets maximize that opportunity
 
ethiostar;3275883 said:
Am I the only who want to hold on to Crayton?

He's not a #1 receiver but we don't need him to be. He's been very consistent in the last few years.

2009----------37 rec 622 Yds 5 tds
2008----------39 rec 550 yds 4 tds
2007----------50 rec 697 yds 7 tds
2006----------36 rec 516 yds 4 tds

When given the opportunity he has delivered.

We have Austin and Roy as #1 and #2 wrs, assuming that Roy develops a better chemistry with Romo (knock on wood). I really like Ogletree but i still need to see him perform a bit more.

Witten and Crayton have been the most consistent receivers for this team in last 4 years. I don't understand the rush to get rid of Crayton.

Nope, me neither. The guy makes plays when you least suspect it. Can we upgrade? Yes. But to get rid of him right now to me would be foolish at this point.
 
Give me Tate instead of Blount and Im in. Blount is going to be one of those guys that always gets in fights and gets in trouble.
 
ethiostar;3275883 said:
Am I the only who wants to hold on to Crayton?

He's not a #1 receiver but we don't need him to be. He's been very consistent in the last few years.

2009----------37 rec 622 Yds 5 tds
2008----------39 rec 550 yds 4 tds
2007----------50 rec 697 yds 7 tds
2006----------36 rec 516 yds 4 tds

When given the opportunity he has delivered.

We have Austin and Roy as #1 and #2 wrs, assuming that Roy develops a better chemistry with Romo (knock on wood). I really like Ogletree but i still need to see him perform a bit more.

Witten and Crayton have been the most consistent receivers for this team in last 4 years. I don't understand the rush to get rid of Crayton.

No, you're not. Patrick Crayton is a very good receiver for the role he plays. However, if you can move him and get an identical player at a cheaper price, I'd do it.
 
casmith07;3276171 said:
No, you're not. Patrick Crayton is a very good receiver for the role he plays. However, if you can move him and get an identical player at a cheaper price, I'd do it.

Crayton is pretty cheap right now
 
Bob Sacamano;3276173 said:
Crayton is pretty cheap right now

You're right - he signed for 4-years around $14M. I like Patrick Crayton a lot. Not a burner but I love watching him make those big catches and take huge hits and hold on to the ball. I still remember him catching that bomb to beat the Skins way back in like 2005.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
466,181
Messages
13,921,321
Members
23,795
Latest member
Derekbsenior
Back
Top