He can have games where you wouldn’t know he was playing if you wasn’t looking for him.
It's time to be honest about your use of the English language.
However, I agree with your point
to some extent. I've long felt he was as interested in his podcast as anything else. I don't doubt his on-the-field effort and actually have come to believe that his need to take plays off is due to a combination of being asked to do too much and his own misallocation of his energy/battery/endurance. I sorta get the feeling (and that is all it is at this point) that he is a bit uncoachable and will have a hard time adjusting as age and wear-and-tear take their toll. When his mind-bending speed and acceleration drop back down to mere mortal levels, I think his production will take a quick and steep hit. It
feels like he'll be a player that'll get 17.5 sacks and eleventy-billion pressures one season but show up the next and get 8 sacks and a third as many pressures. Running backs are usually the players that hit walls like this (or at least they come to mind more often), but I'd put DEs as next in line. Yes, I know his history is at LB but, if we're "being honest" in this thread, his production comes as a pass rusher.
Somewhat contrary to what I said earlier about his being uncoachable, I do think that he (along with the rest of the defense) has finally adjusted to Zimmer's scheme. I think some of the early struggles were due to the relative complexity of Zimmer's approach compared to that of Quinn. I believe that Quinn's approach was going to wear Parsons down very quickly. Zimmer's somewhat less so. That might buy Parsons some time before he drops off a cliff...if I'm right about him being one of those players. This is a long way around to saying that signing Parsons to a long-term, high-dollar deal feels like a trap. Not an intentional one laid Parsons' agent or anything conspiratorial, just that even if his big contract is a result of good faith from both him and the Cowboys, it seems likely that he'll end up being a very high-profile case of "dead money" in 2-3 years. If he continues to be equally productive for three more years, then it might not be the end of the world. If signs a huge contract and then proceeds to have one good year, a plummet in production in the second one, and prayers aren't answered for a recovery in the third, then it will have been a disaster.
Obviously, all that is hypothetical and speculative. Much depends on the value, length, and structure of any deal he gets (and he is way more likely than not that the one he gets will be with the Cowboys). But I do have reservations about handing him a huge sack of cash. This is based largely on personality, playing style (I haven't mentioned that it could, in my mind, increase the chances of injury), and track record of players
like him (clearly talented and great while they lasted, but with sustainability issues).