That is fine I'm not the only one who has doubts about him and there are some who feel as yourself. If I saw a guy who I felt was a consensus franchise type QB then yes likely I would. In other word is there was a guy like an Andrew Luck I would pull the trigger.
Did the retirement of Aikman not teach anyone anything at all? It is very, vey hard to replace good/great QBs. Waiting until you absolutely HAVE to have one is a recipe for disaster. Even with a high pick, you are not guaranteed to find one ( Andrew Lucks don't come around often ). You have got to start looking for one BEFORE it is a MUST or unless you get very lucky you become the Browns or Jacksonville, etc. always looking for but not getting a good one and becoming a bad team for a long while.
If we DID draft JF at 16 and if he didn't impress anyone sitting behind Romo for a couple years and flamed out when he DID have that chance ( when Romo is gone ), then we would not have to wait very long before we could start over with another QB ( instead of waiting until Romo is gone then giving a QB 3 or so years to try and pan out before trying again ). We'd probably save a good 2 seasons that way.
I still think the point will be moot and JF will be gone at 16 ( and I'd still prefer Donald even over JF ) but I don't think it would be smart for the organization to pass on JF ( or another QB ) as long as THEY think he has a good chance to become a franchise QB. It's not like Romo is a young healthy player anymore.