blueblood70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 44,023
- Reaction score
- 29,567
You can keep saying that, but it still won't make it true..I meant signing outside free agents; which means the Cowboys would be actively trying to improve the talent and depth of their roster.
Keeping your own players is necessary but it is not making the team better. It's just maintaining the status quo. The Cowboys are only doing half of what they should be doing in free agency.
if you lose those players it makes you worse, it's the same as this exact post, so if we decide to keep Jlew, it would've been status quo , but instead you count that as a loss and somehow it's a negative, but if he just stayed it wouldn't have been a positive? LMAO
common reasoning, the additions do matter because if they would have not signed, again they would've been holes to fill, just like Lewis..
I mean come on is that too much common sense for you to understand all signings need to be in one spot because they ALL matter, and all losses in another..
it makes more sense this way, not just outside FA, it's our own free agents matter,
again, they leave holes you're saying Lewis didn't leave a hole but if we decide him it had been oh, we like our guys!!

