James Caseys highlight vid

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
Well, we'll just have to wait and see if Casey is another Whalen or Bjornson. Could be he's another Christiansen, or perhaps he is the first Casey.


We'll know soon.
 

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
BAT;2740097 said:
"...down the road"??? I must have not read this right the first time. Do you honestly believe that players with Casey's production and versatility are available every draft???


Casey would fill 4 obvious Cowboys' needs: QB (3rd string), Wildcat QB, FB & Slot receiver.


Most drafts would require FOUR different players/picks to fill those needs, Casey fills all those needs in one fell swoop. Jerry knows these type of players do not come along very often, and he knows a bargain when he sees it, even if at 69.

He's going to be a rookie next season.

You have him as the team's MVP if we draft him.

Calm down.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
dcfanatic;2740720 said:
He's going to be a rookie next season.

You have him as the team's MVP if we draft him.

Calm down.

Now you're just being silly, per usual. You know well and good I never said, or even inferred, any such thing.


You don't like the guy, ok, we get it. Move on.
 

Rush 2112

New Member
Messages
1,496
Reaction score
0
I could easily see Anthony Hill drafted 4th-5th round by us.

Especially after trading down a couple times in 2-3.
 

SLATEmosphere

Benched
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
2
BAT;2740097 said:
"...Casey would fill 4 obvious Cowboys' needs: QB (3rd string), Wildcat QB, FB & Slot receiver.


Most drafts would require FOUR different players/picks to fill those needs, Casey fills all those needs in one fell swoop. Jerry knows these type of players do not come along very often, and he knows a bargain when he sees it, even if at 69.

I really don't want to respond to you but I can't help it since your sounding like an idiot.

3rd string QB-Little to no experience in college playing that position. And you expect him to transition into the NFL at that? I'd rather have Stanback. At least he's played a full season at QB in college. FAIL

Wildcat QB- A stupid gimmick that is and will get figured out. Once again I'd rather have Stanback or even Felix. FAIL

FB- Your asking him to lead block full time? Would you ask Tebow to lead block full time? Cricket>Casey at FB. FAIL

Slot reciever- 6"4 260 pound slot reciever? HA! please stop. If he could be that then he'd be a 1st-2nd rounder. Once again very little experience. I'd rather draft someone who specializes in his skill.FAIL

So your giving up a 3rd rounder for this guy who will see little to no action? I'm glad you arn't running the Cowboys because you would drive them straight to the ground.
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
18,437
Reaction score
25,817
With Witten, Bennett, and Rodney Hannah (who I like a lot) we just don't have a need for this guy. I get that he is versatile but he'll be mainly used as a TE. He is going to be a very good NFL player, just not for us.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,200
Chris in SoCal;2740759 said:
With Witten, Bennett, and Rodney Hannah (who I like a lot) we just don't have a need for this guy. I get that he is versatile but he'll be mainly used as a TE. He is going to be a very good NFL player, just not for us.

See I don't think he would be mainly used as a TE at all.

He'd definetely get some PT as a TE because we use all 3 of our guys.


I think what they want to do with him is line him up with fullback and have the ability to switch formations at anytime and not lose a receiving threat when he splits out wide.

Plus he can do the whole h-back thing as well like Chris Cooley.






I imagine this guy will go to a team that has ties with Belichick or Parcells considering this is the type of guys that they draft.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
SLATEmosphere;2740750 said:
I really don't want to respond to you but I can't help it since your sounding like an idiot.

LOL. I thought you didn't want to play anymore? I will bow to your experience and knowledge about what idiots sound like, I am sure you hear it everyday. :D


SLATEmosphere;2740750 said:
3rd string QB-Little to no experience in college playing that position. And you expect him to transition into the NFL at that? I'd rather have Stanback. At least he's played a full season at QB in college. FAIL

Wildcat QB- A stupid gimmick that is and will get figured out. Once again I'd rather have Stanback or even Felix. FAIL

FB- Your asking him to lead block full time? Would you ask Tebow to lead block full time? Cricket>Casey at FB. FAIL

Slot reciever- 6"4 260 pound slot reciever? HA! please stop. If he could be that then he'd be a 1st-2nd rounder. Once again very little experience. I'd rather draft someone who specializes in his skill.FAIL

So your giving up a 3rd rounder for this guy who will see little to no action? I'm glad you arn't running the Cowboys because you would drive them straight to the ground.


McGee has seen as little action and teams are still looking to spend a high middle draft pick on him. All the rest is re-hash, you can look it up, educating you is worthless.


FAIL is the perfect byword for all your posts. Very apt and descriptive, keep it up, you bring so much to the table. That was sarcasm by the way. :lmao2:
 

Chief

"Friggin Joke Monkey"
Messages
8,543
Reaction score
4
dcfanatic;2739942 said:
I am not hating, but we do know these highlights are not against the Eagles, Giants and Skins right?

On the clips versus SMU, the Mustangs appear to have about the worst college defense I've ever seen. Wow.

The guy reminds me of Todd Fowler, a USFL back whom Dallas got from the Houston Gamblers. Also, a little like Todd Christensen.
 

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
BAT;2740732 said:
Now you're just being silly, per usual. You know well and good I never said, or even inferred, any such thing.


You don't like the guy, ok, we get it. Move on.

Why don't I like him? You sure are a 'conclusion jumper' type.

I am just not going to say we have to have him because he does a lot of things. If he was so good at doing one thing then maybe I check him out in the 3rd round.

He was getting a ton of looks in that spread offense at slot WR and that's because Dillard was getting all the coverage on the outside.

I doubt he's a better blocker as a FB than what's already on the team.

I could care less about the Wildcat because first I could use some consistent traditional offense.

Could he be a punt returner? Maybe, but keep in mind he only averaged 8 yards per return so he wasn't tearing it up.

And like I already noted. He was playing SMU, Western Michigan, Tulane, North Texas, Memphis, UTEP, Houston, etc.

Those were all games where the word 'defense' never came into play.

He went up against the Texas defense and had 8 catches for 51 yards.
 

SLATEmosphere

Benched
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
2
dcfanatic;2740878 said:
Why don't I like him? You sure are a 'conclusion jumper' type.

I am just not going to say we have to have him because he does a lot of things. If he was so good at doing one thing then maybe I check him out in the 3rd round.

He was getting a ton of looks in that spread offense at slot WR and that's because Dillard was getting all the coverage on the outside.

I doubt he's a better blocker as a FB than what's already on the team.

I could care less about the Wildcat because first I could use some consistent traditional offense.

Could he be a punt returner? Maybe, but keep in mind he only averaged 8 yards per return so he wasn't tearing it up.

And like I already noted. He was playing SMU, Western Michigan, Tulane, North Texas, Memphis, UTEP, Houston, etc.

Those were all games where the word 'defense' never came into play.

He went up against the Texas defense and had 8 catches for 51 yards.

Hey now! watch it! lol jk WMU defense was pretty trash all around. I admit it. But This Casey guy doesn't have much value to this team and people asking him to play FB is just ignorant. I have my doubts about these guys. Seems to be one in every draft. BAT just puts these random guys on pedastels and cracks his ribs reaching for them. AKA Vekuine.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
dcfanatic;2740878 said:
Why don't I like him? You sure are a 'conclusion jumper' type.

I am just not going to say we have to have him because he does a lot of things. If he was so good at doing one thing then maybe I check him out in the 3rd round.

He was getting a ton of looks in that spread offense at slot WR and that's because Dillard was getting all the coverage on the outside.

I doubt he's a better blocker as a FB than what's already on the team.

I could care less about the Wildcat because first I could use some consistent traditional offense.

Could he be a punt returner? Maybe, but keep in mind he only averaged 8 yards per return so he wasn't tearing it up.

And like I already noted. He was playing SMU, Western Michigan, Tulane, North Texas, Memphis, UTEP, Houston, etc.

Those were all games where the word 'defense' never came into play.

He went up against the Texas defense and had 8 catches for 51 yards.

Are you saying Delmas is not worth a first day pick then? Because all he played against were of similar competition level. And if scouts, teams & analysts are ranking Casey as a first day pick, then I am going to have to go with the experts. You are just a fan, just like anyone else.

As for me jumping to conclusions, your past comments are enough to draw a reaonable inference. You have constantly guffawed and snickered about Casey throughout, this thread and others.

The crack about him not accomplishing what he did against the Eagles or Giants is completely ludicrous, something I would not have expected from you. There no draftees, whether they played at OSU or USC, who have played against the Eagles or Giants. NONE. That remark was petty not to mention inane. It brought nothing to the discussion.

Yet again, ad nauseum, the Cowboys seem to think Casey is draftable and are working him out, if they want him as a FB (as reported) then I'm sure they are doing their due diligence about his ability to perform at that position. Everything else is just speculation, or in your case, sour grapes. Don't take your anger out on this kid just b/c I'm touting him. I can be an arse, but Casey is the kind of guy you build teams with. Talent, toughness, production and character, who could dislike that?
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
SLATEmosphere;2740923 said:
Hey now! watch it! lol jk WMU defense was pretty trash all around. I admit it. But This Casey guy doesn't have much value to this team and people asking him to play FB is just ignorant. I have my doubts about these guys. Seems to be one in every draft. BAT just puts these random guys on pedastels and cracks his ribs reaching for them. AKA Vekuine.

Is it recess already? If you did your homework, you would know that my mocks are sourced by NFLDS & CBSSPORTS. Blame them for the "reaches". Like I said, don't bother responding, everyone knows the drill.


FAIL


You are so predictable. Bland, but predictable.
 

RamziD

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,124
Reaction score
2,863
BAT;2740785 said:
LOL. I thought you didn't want to play anymore? I will bow to your experience and knowledge about what idiots sound like, I am sure you hear it everyday. :D





McGee has seen as little action and teams are still looking to spend a high middle draft pick on him. All the rest is re-hash, you can look it up, educating you is worthless.


FAIL is the perfect byword for all your posts. Very apt and descriptive, keep it up, you bring so much to the table. That was sarcasm by the way. :lmao2:



Little action where? As QB? He's got 3+ years college experience there. Or as a wildcat QB? Well, that's a red herring, because there's only a small handful of players who have experience in the wildcat. Besides, I agree with the others who see the wildcat as some short-lived gimmick. Just like I wouldn't take McGee until the late 3rd-4th round, I would hope that we wouldn't be looking at Casey until then either.
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
BAT;2740978 said:
Are you saying Delmas is not worth a first day pick then? Because all he played against were of similar competition level. And if scouts, teams & analysts are ranking Casey as a first day pick, then I am going to have to go with the experts. You are just a fan, just like anyone else.

As for me jumping to conclusions, your past comments are enough to draw a reaonable inference. You have constantly guffawed and snickered about Casey throughout, this thread and others.

The crack about him not accomplishing what he did against the Eagles or Giants is completely ludicrous, something I would not have expected from you. There no draftees, whether they played at OSU or USC, who have played against the Eagles or Giants. NONE. That remark was petty not to mention inane. It brought nothing to the discussion.

Yet again, ad nauseum, the Cowboys seem to think Casey is draftable and are working him out, if they want him as a FB (as reported) then I'm sure they are doing their due diligence about his ability to perform at that position. Everything else is just speculation, or in your case, sour grapes. Don't take your anger out on this kid just b/c I'm touting him. I can be an arse, but Casey is the kind of guy you build teams with. Talent, toughness, production and character, who could dislike that?

I think part of the problem is that quite a few posters don't want the wildcat, and that they are upset that the Cowboys have interest in that formation. As a result, they are hating on the player.

I think the other problem is that some don't want more playmakers on the team, for some strange reason, because Garrett can't figure out how to use them. Or they think the player doesn't suit the team.

Of course, the Cowboys seem to think differently given that we're working out Casey, P White, McGee, Edelman (sp?) who all can potentially play more than one position, including running the wildcat.

My guess is we're going to try to get someone to run this formation, plus play other positions, and quite a few people may be disappointed come Sunday evening.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
RamziD;2741013 said:
Little action where? As QB? He's got 3+ years college experience there. Or as a wildcat QB? Well, that's a red herring, because there's only a small handful of players who have experience in the wildcat. Besides, I agree with the others who see the wildcat as some short-lived gimmick. Just like I wouldn't take McGee until the late 3rd-4th round, I would hope that we wouldn't be looking at Casey until then either.

McGee has had little experience in a pro offense (3 games maybe?). He played in an option offense his first 2 years under Francione.


Same w/Casey, he was the wildcat QB on the Rice team. By the by, Casey would have been the starting QB for Rice in 2009 if he had stayed in school. Casey knows their offense, and defense, inside and out. I don't think he will have much difficulty absorbing a pro playbook.


As for the wildcat, I am on the fence, I have reservations about Garrett being able to run it, but I don't make those decisions. Jerry wants the wildcat added to the playbook, and he wants a player to run it. Stanback probably could do it, not sure if he has any experience as such (plus it may hinder his development at WR, let's not even discuss his chronic injury issues) and I am pretty sure Crayton is not dynamic enough to threaten any team at that position.
 

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
BAT;2740978 said:
Are you saying Delmas is not worth a first day pick then? Because all he played against were of similar competition level. And if scouts, teams & analysts are ranking Casey as a first day pick, then I am going to have to go with the experts. You are just a fan, just like anyone else.

As for me jumping to conclusions, your past comments are enough to draw a reaonable inference. You have constantly guffawed and snickered about Casey throughout, this thread and others.

The crack about him not accomplishing what he did against the Eagles or Giants is completely ludicrous, something I would not have expected from you. There no draftees, whether they played at OSU or USC, who have played against the Eagles or Giants. NONE. That remark was petty not to mention inane. It brought nothing to the discussion.

Yet again, ad nauseum, the Cowboys seem to think Casey is draftable and are working him out, if they want him as a FB (as reported) then I'm sure they are doing their due diligence about his ability to perform at that position. Everything else is just speculation, or in your case, sour grapes. Don't take your anger out on this kid just b/c I'm touting him. I can be an arse, but Casey is the kind of guy you build teams with. Talent, toughness, production and character, who could dislike that?

Mrs. Casey, calm down.

I am not trying to hurt your son.

I just have the opinion that he's good at a lot of things and not great at anything.

And the comment that his numbers are against teams that aren't the NFC East is completely relevant because that's who he is going to be playing twice a year if he's drafted by the Cowboys.

It's called perspective.

And Delmas is one player. And his defense as a whole stunk last year.

Constantly guffawed against Casey? I think I posted about him three times so far, lol.

Now I hate James Casey, lol.

I think it's because I don't loooooooooovvvvveee David Veikune that has me in this spotlight, lol.
 

SLATEmosphere

Benched
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
2
BAT;2740785 said:
LOL. I thought you didn't want to play anymore? I will bow to your experience and knowledge about what idiots sound like, I am sure you hear it everyday. :D





McGee has seen as little action and teams are still looking to spend a high middle draft pick on him. All the rest is re-hash, you can look it up, educating you is worthless.


FAIL is the perfect byword for all your posts. Very apt and descriptive, keep it up, you bring so much to the table. That was sarcasm by the way. :lmao2:


EPIC FAIL.

I cannot believe you have the balls to "try" and call me out and tell me "to do my homework". Dude. You know Mcgee played QB for 3 years at Texas A&M full time right??? Or is NFLDS telling you something else? You just lost whatever credibilty you had. Comparing a guy like Casey who's played a handful a snaps at QB in college to a guy who's had 3 years of starting experience. Good job there pal..way to make yourself look like the dimwit you actually are.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
dcfanatic;2741072 said:
Mrs. Casey, calm down.

I am not trying to hurt your son.

I just have the opinion that he's good at a lot of things and not great at anything.

And the comment that his numbers are against teams that aren't the NFC East is completely relevant because that's who he is going to be playing twice a year if he's drafted by the Cowboys.

It's called perspective.

And Delmas is one player. And his defense as a whole stunk last year.

Constantly guffawed against Casey? I think I posted about him three times so far, lol.

Now I hate James Casey, lol.

I think it's because I don't loooooooooovvvvveee David Veikune that has me in this spotlight, lol.

Hate? Don't believe I mentioned that, not even a word I like to use. Perspective?? You have none, that comment was asinine. EVERY player in the draft does not have any experience playing against pro teams, you trying to twist it as some insight is downright hilarious. You're a little stiff in your backpedal. :lmao2:


As for the rest of your comments, it is pretty clear that you have nothing to add to the discussion at hand. Your bias is clearly towards me, not the players discussed. So be honest, and say so.


As for the "Mrs. Casey" crack. Very droll. Your creativity and wit know no bounds. :rolleyes:
 
Top