We should've taken a chance on Tyler Eifert.
More upside to be an actual impact player instead of a player like Witten who will be limited.
Definitely meth... he's not going down.Haha, terribly sorry for putting a positive light on this.
Should get a poll going to see how many people agree.He made Beasley apologize when he quit, so when is Jason's coming?

It sounds like we'll be paying quite a bit for those this year, between Sean Lee and now Witten.
And I'm sure we wouldn't want to "hurt feelings" by not paying Witten a pretty penny...
'Tis.I can’t stop laughing. Not because this is bad for you per se, he will probably help your offense a good bit. But this is just so dang weird.
A rose, by any other name, would be "holy crap why is this thing so thorny?!".'Tis.
...... If that's dynamic young talent, please kill me now.
Knowing this FO, it could be anyone. But, I would go with Rico.Rico?
Jarwin?
Schultz?
Gotta be Rico.....
Witten replaces the 2nd or 3rd draft pick we would have used on TE, which will now be a late round pick who goes to the Practice Squad. Rico is in the same position no matter what, he has to break out next year or he gets cut.
And for everyone complaining about Witten, there is very little doubt the team told him he would have a reduced role if he came back - and Witten agreed.
Also 2017 was the worst season of his career with 63 catches and that still would have been the 8th best total in the NFL for a TE. I actually like the idea of Witten and Jarwin as the primary TEs with Schultz rotating into both spots.
Lol... I laughed!Maybe Witten heard some inside scoop about Romo returning (as the Head Coach in 2020) and wanted to be a part of that. This year to "warm up".
A rose, by any other name, would be "holy crap why is this thing so thorny?!".


Swaim or Rico. I would put Rico on PS and resign Swaim.
We should've taken a chance on Tyler Eifert.
More upside to be an actual impact player instead of a player like Witten who will be limited.
What if this doesn't mean they don't draft a TE at #58? What if this makes it even more likely? What if they decide to draft a young guy and give him a year to learn at the feet of the Master?
Eifert has played in 28 games over the past five years. He can't stay healthy. I think the Cowboys will still entertain the thought of bringing him here, but they will have to be careful with the $$$.
Eifert has played in 28 games over the past five years.
I'd rather roll the dice and have the potential of Eifert playing and if he can't going with Jarwin over a non- dynamic limited Jason Witten.
Witten isn't a whole lot better then Jarwin at this point.
Eifert is better then both by quite a bit.
