Point 1: Still waiting for an explanation as to what has improved so that he needs a brace that provides less support if his nerve has not fired. You have nothing.
My gosh you're utterly useless and dishonest.
I see your tactic now. I answer your questions and you simply turn around and claim I haven't answered them. That's go-to tactic of someone that's mentally spent and can't engage in the argument.
I'll suffer you one last time.
The structure of his knee is sound and has been for months. By now the nerve has had time to go through its healing cycle/phases and the growth has likely extended to or is near the muscle pathways it needs to reinnervate, which would be indicated by the new "feelings" and function that's been developing of late which shows progress. That does not mean the nerve is now firing the affected muscle fibers to the point of full function or strength, but it does indicate marked improvement than where he was 7-8 months ago.
Point 2: You stated that the video was obscure. I pointed out that you could clearly see his foot orientation even at that resolution. Outside of that you have nothing. You can also see the fluidity and evenness of his motion at that resolution. If you cannot then that is your personal issue because several others have commented on it without my input. You have zero response to the fluidity argument besides a generalized claim to victory and multiple assertions without supporting arguments.
Further, I have never claimed victory. I am simply stating you have no response. All you ever do is go for the generalized dismissal. You can see his movements and orientation on the video. Oh and they are hurdles btw.
Nope. Never said the video was obscure (though the resolution is).
I said your analysis/conclusion based off the video was obscure. I've given you detailed responses (MULTIPLE TIMES) of the mechanics and motion of jumping and how the foot naturally flexes downward when coming down from a jump.
Your repeated mindless response has been "baaah, you've got nothing...you never answered my question!" That's tantamount to claiming an empty victory.
Point 3: Where has Jaylon's increased performance been since last year? Be specific. Don't just assert it. I have to say you are one of the more intellectually lazy individual around.
I have not ignored Fisher and Rappoport. I don't find them overly credible and that is not it. I specifically cited a report stating the nerve has fired which you have conceded after a weak rebuttal and that I am convinced by what I see with my own eyes.
If you will note, I am having multiple people like my posts when I discuss this indicate they see it too.
See the answer to point #1.
Also, the fact you equate "likes" garnered as an indicator of the validity of an argument is laughable, but another hallmark of low-level thinkers.
As for Fischer you do realize that having dropfoot and the nerve firing are not mutually exclusive right? You do understand that there are degrees of dropfoot depending on strength and spasticity right? I have talked about how while I can see that he can pick up his foot it appears weak.
As for the last bit. After the hurdles, he has a tape job on his feet. I see no evidence of a brace and certainly not the brace that he wore last year.
Yeah, I absolutely understand dropfoot has degrees of healing and funciton, which is directly inline with my response in point #1.
So, based on your repeated logic, your belief is Jaylon
should either be wearing the same bulky brace he was 8 months ago or he's not wearing one at all?
Still waiting for an explanation as to why they would go with a less supportive brace than what he had before if there was no improvement with his dropfoot.
Lol, smh. You seriously have no intellectual honest scruples to you. I've gone on record repeatedly talking about Jaylon's improvement in his dropfoot condition. This is just more of you ignoring the actual response and repeating the question as if the answer was never given. Again, a cheap debate tactic.
And the reason why I put you on ignore is that you resort to personal attacks and spam. It's not about cowering. It's about control.
What do I interpolate? Be specific.
For example your extrapolating a brace different that what he had on before and without any direct evidence. When I say he is picking up his foot its because I can see him lower it and pick it back up. It is not nearly the same thing.
What have I been dishonest about? Be specific.
The list I made was analogous line to paragraph in describing your work. Your list is just your typical insults, appeal to ridicule, mischaracterizations, and blanket dismissals.
And when did I say I was leaving the board?
You're extrapolating that he doesn't wear a brace at all because you don't see him wearing the very same brace he wore 8-9 months ago in August. That's simple-minded deduction on your part.
Lool, what have you been dishonest about? Look no further than the comments I've been responding to in this post.
"Your list is just [...] mischaracterizations, blanket dismissals [...]" ooooh, the irony.
And you use the ignore function the same way an adolescent uses his blanket to hide from the boogie man ("if I hide my face, the boogie man can't see me" = "I don't have to provide answers if I don't actually see them").
