Jean-Jacques Taylor: Henson Project Could Be Sacked

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,955
Reaction score
8,173
I'm quoting Zippy's predictions in my own post so I can test the validity of it later:

"Henson will NEVER amount to anything in this leauge unless it has a little (e) after it.

Terry Glenn is the most over-rated Cowboy ever and this year will show it.

Bobby Carpenter, who?

BILL PARCELLS is here through the 2009 season...possibly longer...possibly until we cart his dead corpse off the field. Jimmy Johnson returns shortly thereafter to coach us again.

Our next "franchise" QB's name is not Drew Henson or Brady Quinn."
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,650
Reaction score
42,989
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
summerisfunner said:
lol, point taken Brain, but sorry, if I see the same counter-arguments broached about Henson and/or Romo, I'm going to react with my same arguments that counter the counter-argument


I am not saying that nobody can argue their points it is just the same thing over and over and nobody seems to be willing to give an inch.

Reminds me of a line from an anthrax song.

"Cold sweat, my fists are clenching
Stomp, stomp, stomp the idiot convention

Which one of these words dont you understand
Im caught in a mosh!
Talking to you is like clapping with one hand"

:laugh1:
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
BrAinPaiNt said:
I am not saying that nobody can argue their points it is just the same thing over and over and nobody seems to be willing to give an inch.

Reminds me of a line from an anthrax song.

"Cold sweat, my fists are clenching
Stomp, stomp, stomp the idiot convention

Which one of these words dont you understand
Im caught in a mosh!
Talking to you is like clapping with one hand"

:laugh1:

Anthrax suxs!
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,402
Reaction score
7,923
summerisfunner said:
but my question now is, would it then be fair to make assessments on only 2 or 3 games? to me, the answer is a resounding no

would it be fair to make it on "less" than that? i'll agree with the "no" here. :)

and I'm saying that I tend to put faith in the evaluation capabilities of our coach, who has been around QBs for years, even though people may disagree with the success he's had, at least Parcells has been doing it for awhile and has somewhat of an idea by watching them in practice

great. i totally understand that but reserve the right to disagree with the esteemed bp. : ) just tends to get me in trouble when i do.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
iceberg said:
great. i totally understand that but reserve the right to disagree with the esteemed bp. : ) just tends to get me in trouble when i do.

You don't get "in trouble" because you disagree with Bill. You are getting it because you're wrong. :p:

Seriously, saying that people are jumping on you because you disagree with Parcells is basically saying that everyone's opinion is not valid, just automatic defense of Parcells.

Of course you have the right to disagree with Bill. But you don't have the right to blanket statement everyone else's opinion as blind faith.

Myself and many others happen to agree that there was little to be gained and something to be lost by putting the QBs in that situation. You disagree, fine.

But honestly, be straight. Even if you are 100% right, is it really that big of a deal that it needs to be talked about a year and half later? Do you REALLY think those games would dramatically alter our current QB situation one way or the other?
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,402
Reaction score
7,923
wileedog said:
You don't get "in trouble" because you disagree with Bill. You are getting it because you're wrong. :p:

Seriously, saying that people are jumping on you because you disagree with Parcells is basically saying that everyone's opinion is not valid, just automatic defense of Parcells.

Of course you have the right to disagree with Bill. But you don't have the right to blanket statement everyone else's opinion as blind faith.

Myself and many others happen to agree that there was little to be gained and something to be lost by putting the QBs in that situation. You disagree, fine.

But honestly, be straight. Even if you are 100% right, is it really that big of a deal that it needs to be talked about a year and half later? Do you REALLY think those games would dramatically alter our current QB situation one way or the other?

guess we'll never know.

interesting points, wile - but if you say "bill is the coach and i trust him" what other adjectives would you use?
 

jackrussell

Last of the Duke Street Kings
Messages
4,165
Reaction score
1
wileedog said:
But honestly, be straight. Even if you are 100% right, is it really that big of a deal that it needs to be talked about a year and half later?

Only a year and a half?

Seems MUCH longer than that.
 

jackrussell

Last of the Duke Street Kings
Messages
4,165
Reaction score
1
iceberg said:
well when you live in dog years...

2.gif
 
Top