Jerry and Stephen disagree over Pacman PFT

Alexander;2868751 said:
Romo-friendly could also mean offensive design. I believe Vela touched on it, more running, emphasis on roll-outs and a shortened field with less downfield passing.
I think "Romo-friendly" means he has less emphasis on a single read. If you remember when Garrett showed up, there was a big hooplah about TO being the "X receiver" in Garrett's offense, which apparently carried the distinction of being the first read on just about every play. Tony, however, is at his best when he's spreading the ball around. And from camp it appears he's doing that quite a bit.
 
B.S.


As much as I'd love to jump on the jed is an idiot band wagon, we already have talent on this team, at his position, that's equal and for the most part better.


We simply don't need Jones. God that felt good.............
 
Alexander;2868751 said:
Romo-friendly could also mean offensive design. I believe Vela touched on it, more running, emphasis on roll-outs and a shortened field with less downfield passing.

Except that Jerry first used that phrase when answering a question about TO's release. Cryptic he ain't.
 
theogt;2868764 said:
I think "Romo-friendly" means he has less emphasis on a single read. If you remember when Garrett showed up, there was a big hooplah about TO being the "X receiver" in Garrett's offense, which apparently carried the distinction of being the first read on just about every play. Tony, however, is at his best when he's spreading the ball around. And from camp it appears he's doing that quite a bit.

Exactly!

I have always taken Romo-freindly to mean that there is no pressure from someone about getting the ball enough and whining when they don't.

That and not waiting for your aged WR to escape press coverage thus causing you to get the crap beat out of you every game!
 
I wonder what's gonna happen next offseason when Jerry doesn't have a new stadium to keep him occupied....
 
Rampage;2868804 said:
I wonder what's gonna happen next offseason when Jerry doesn't have a new stadium to keep him occupied....

sudoku
 
The fact Jery said it when he was tipsy actually makes me think that deep down he would like to do it.
 
CaptainAmerica;2868867 said:
The fact Jery said it when he was tipsy actually makes me think that deep down he would like to do it.

i tried to tell you zones, that stephen is getting more control and input;
 
PFT: "we dont have anything to report on anything, so we'll just make something up"

PS: "Its what we do best"
 
Alexander;2868670 said:
How would this be "proven" to your or anyone else's satisfaction? I am sure you and others would call anything that puts Jerry Jones in negative light as a "lie" concocted by that darn evil media again.


Name a source and hold someone accountable.

It may be true. It may not be true. But without a source of any kind than it is nothing but a rumor.
 
Jerry wants the Pacman video game back in the War Room and Stephen does not. Simple as that.
 
Everlastingxxx;2868487 said:
Yea heard that on the Irvin show. The son is smarter than the dad. Sad.
It isn't sad. It would be sad if we were going from a George Halas to a Mike McCaskey. A Paul Brown to a Mike Brown.

All indications are the son is a better football man than his Dad. Nothing sad about that at all.
 
Hostile;2869031 said:
It isn't sad. It would be sad if we were going from a George Halas to a Mike McCaskey. A Paul Brown to a Mike Brown.

All indications are the son is a better football man than his Dad. Nothing sad about that at all.
The future is bright.
 
The time may come when Jerra might start having even more senior moments, forgetting names, slapping Stanback more on the rump and then Stephen will have him sent to a home for aged billionaires.
 
Earlier in the offseason, I'd have been okay with a Pacman return.

But there's no way you can make that move now. Not after preaching "football first" to the team, and not after such a smooth, distraction-free start to training camp.
 
Pacman may have poor judgment but his athletic talent is extreme. He is as undisciplined as much as his poor judgment is evident. If he would settle down and let them coach him there is currently no one in the league with his talent. I'm talking about athletic talent and not talent as a CB. He's an above average CB but his undisciplined ways make him as much a vunerability as an asset. It's a lot of bang and bust for Adam. Too bad.
 
jobberone;2869741 said:
Pacman may have poor judgment but his athletic talent is extreme. He is as undisciplined as much as his poor judgment is evident. If he would settle down and let them coach him there is currently no one in the league with his talent.
Wow!

He's not that talented. He's not even the most talented guy on our team.
 
Hostile;2869031 said:
It isn't sad. It would be sad if we were going from a George Halas to a Mike McCaskey. A Paul Brown to a Mike Brown.

All indications are the son is a better football man than his Dad. Nothing sad about that at all.


We should ALL be giving thanks. I know i do, every day!
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
466,179
Messages
13,921,240
Members
23,795
Latest member
Derekbsenior
Back
Top