I think "Romo-friendly" means he has less emphasis on a single read. If you remember when Garrett showed up, there was a big hooplah about TO being the "X receiver" in Garrett's offense, which apparently carried the distinction of being the first read on just about every play. Tony, however, is at his best when he's spreading the ball around. And from camp it appears he's doing that quite a bit.Alexander;2868751 said:Romo-friendly could also mean offensive design. I believe Vela touched on it, more running, emphasis on roll-outs and a shortened field with less downfield passing.
Alexander;2868751 said:Romo-friendly could also mean offensive design. I believe Vela touched on it, more running, emphasis on roll-outs and a shortened field with less downfield passing.
theogt;2868764 said:I think "Romo-friendly" means he has less emphasis on a single read. If you remember when Garrett showed up, there was a big hooplah about TO being the "X receiver" in Garrett's offense, which apparently carried the distinction of being the first read on just about every play. Tony, however, is at his best when he's spreading the ball around. And from camp it appears he's doing that quite a bit.
Rampage;2868804 said:I wonder what's gonna happen next offseason when Jerry doesn't have a new stadium to keep him occupied....
CaptainAmerica;2868867 said:The fact Jery said it when he was tipsy actually makes me think that deep down he would like to do it.
Alexander;2868670 said:How would this be "proven" to your or anyone else's satisfaction? I am sure you and others would call anything that puts Jerry Jones in negative light as a "lie" concocted by that darn evil media again.
It isn't sad. It would be sad if we were going from a George Halas to a Mike McCaskey. A Paul Brown to a Mike Brown.Everlastingxxx;2868487 said:Yea heard that on the Irvin show. The son is smarter than the dad. Sad.
The future is bright.Hostile;2869031 said:It isn't sad. It would be sad if we were going from a George Halas to a Mike McCaskey. A Paul Brown to a Mike Brown.
All indications are the son is a better football man than his Dad. Nothing sad about that at all.
Chris in SoCal;2868496 said:Can we just give Stephen the team already. Jerry can just make public appearances or something. Kind of like Rowdy...
Wow!jobberone;2869741 said:Pacman may have poor judgment but his athletic talent is extreme. He is as undisciplined as much as his poor judgment is evident. If he would settle down and let them coach him there is currently no one in the league with his talent.
Hostile;2869031 said:It isn't sad. It would be sad if we were going from a George Halas to a Mike McCaskey. A Paul Brown to a Mike Brown.
All indications are the son is a better football man than his Dad. Nothing sad about that at all.