Alexander;3303216 said:He also believed in not kicking the butt of the performers and being ruthless with those that did not produce. Thankfully, Phillips is around and allows Jones to dictate the course of action. Williams' special brand of underachieving would have a hard time flying with the likes of Johnson without an endorsement from up high.
He will be around as long as Jones feels there is any face he can save. It is too soon after a year. But coddling him in some vain attempt to insulate him from criticism has a slim chance of succeeding. Williams has produced one quality season since he has been a professional. Other than that, he was afforded every luxury, from Permian HS to the University of Texas.
The organization, namely Jones, is pursuing this with a personal interest because his reputation is linked because of the price he personally paid for a player he clearly coveted. He likes Williams personally. He honestly does. And we have seen the same type of behavior with other pets he has adopted and sometimes with disasterous results.
It is not the same as a head coach playing mind games with a player to motivate them. It is not the same as a coach giving a break to a player under pressure. This is full blown denial at work by an owner who has a difficult time admitting that possibly he made a serious mistake.
dogberry;3303219 said:How many balls a game is the 2nd receiver going to get in this offense?
Doomsday101;3303226 said:Jimmy stated that not every guy responds the same and no he did not kick every one butt even guys who were not top players you try to find what buttons to push on a player not every person on a 53 man roster is the same Jimmy understood physiology
Lastly Jerry is also the GM not just the owner so what he is saying is not any different than many other GM in the league.
How many balls would say a Patrick Crayton be allowed to drop before he would start getting criticism from the owner/GM?dogberry;3303219 said:How many balls a game is the 2nd receiver going to get in this offense?
Alexander;3303237 said:I do not think this means what you think it means.
And if Jones is attempting to play "physiologist" here, he is doing it wrong with a player who has shown time and time again that he is entitled and has skirted by practically everywhere he has been because his status was tied directly to the reputation of the decision maker.
I do not see a lot of GMs allowing themselves to publicly coddle bad trades to this degree.
The problem here is Jones is just as sensitive to the criticisms and he is spinning his best public face to what will be a louder and louder chorus the more Williams fails to respond.
Alexander;3303194 said:So you are saying Coach Parcells would respond exactly as Jones is right now if he were in that role? You are out of your mind.
It is precisely Jerry's "big ones" that are on the line here. Saying he responds and is sensitive to criticism is not the same as saying he is some sort of shrinking violet. So, do not worry. I am not questioning the size of his cajones. You can still boast to your friends that your GM's bollocks are bigger than their's.Doomsday101;3303249 said:As for Jerry being sensitive please the guy has been taking BS since 1989 when he was blamed about Tom Landry and people have never let up on him if Jerry was that sensitive he would have stepped aside Jerry got big ones and he is not afraid to do what he feels is right nor is he sensitive to catching heat
Alexander;3303291 said:It is precisely Jerry's "big ones" that are on the line here. Saying he responds and is sensitive to criticism is not the same as saying he is some sort of shrinking violet. So, do not worry. I am not questioning the size of his cajones. You can still boast to your friends that your GM's bollocks are bigger than their's.
He is sensitive because he has always bristled at the idea that he has never received the proper credit. Before Parcells, there was Johnson. He always has had an "I'll show 'em" attitude and it is on full display here. When he was about the only decision maker who was willing to pay the high price the Lions demanded, that was his daring side at work.
He desperately wants to not only be recognized for his accomplishments as an owner, but a general manager/talent evaluator as well. He cares quite a bit what people think. He relishes being a risk taker and bathes in the glory when he is right. When he is wrong, it is rare he will admit it and he will doggedly defend the decisions, even to the point he is doing right now.
igtmfo;3303176 said:Archer asked Jerry for his rationale. An important question. That is: hey Jerry, why the double-standard?
Jerry's reply to Archer is the most slippery, nonsensical, deer-in-the-headlights thing I've ever read. You worry about Jerry's mental these days.
He could have said: "No comment" or "We'll let these things play out on the field" or just anything.
First, it shows that Jerry can't cook up a good line of doublespeak these days. He's always been able to BS when he's had to in the past, and it has at least been logical in some alternative universe.
And secondly (sorry, standard anti-RW rant follows) it kind of reinforces many posters' worst fears: that with RW it's NOT what happens on the field, it's about Jerry's pride and his wallet hit. ....
I felt the RW double-standard recently when Wade was asked about whether RW deserved to start last season, when a writer opined that RW wasn't the second-best receiver on the team. Wade's reply didn't get much play. He said "I don't think that's true." That sounds like a equivocal, backpedaling answer. If the truth was that RW deserved starting, Wade would have said "That's not true."
JBond;3303099 said:I would be happy if Roy is not mentioned again on this board until training camp. Can the mods create a Roy Zone? That would help avoid the clutter of Roy W threads in the fan zone.
igtmfo;3303080 said:From Todd Archer's blog:
At the NFL Scouting Combine owner and general manager Jerry Jones said he wanted his players to be "nervous" in 2010 so as to avoid complacency. Yet when the talk turned to Roy Williams, Jones was protective of the wide out.
How does he reconcile the two options?
"You don't need to manufacture things to make Roy nervous, just our situation," Jones said, "and as a matter of fact his ability to handle the things that would make any of us nervous has been impressive to me and is one of the things we're encouraged about. He gets that from enough places but his ability to handle that from enough places is a big plus."
Alexander;3303186 said:It was nonsense and anyone who buys that it is okay to give him less pressure from those that matter because he's hearing it "enough" from fans and media really needs to get a grip.
Basically, he was admitting that yes, he was not going to hold him to that standard and he was playing on the pity that even Williams himself has used on occasion. It is ridiculous to even voice this kind of comment, because it is simply insulting to the intelligence. I do not expect him to simply join in. But trying to imply that indeed Williams will respond with a soft hand is not all that intelligent.
A player you pay that kind of price for deserves whatever barbs and criticisms that can be foisted on them. And it includes the GM foolish enough to pay that price. Jones was completely schooled by Martin Mayhew on that trade and is fortunate he is not catching more for it. Williams' public commentary on the criticism deflects blame from the real culprit and that is Jones. Williams is simply thin-skinned enough that he invites more criticism, which is good for Jones in the long run.
newlander;3303609 said:EXACTLY 'VISIONARY'.....he needs a good, swift kick in the keester. Not hugs and kisses as that hasn't worked.