Twitter: Jerry: I thought we'd look better tonight without Dak

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,766
Reaction score
5,961
Are you really going with a conspiracy that they purposely sabotaged Rush in order to prop up Dak? LOL.

You need a break from the board. It's making you looney.

PS - Rush stinks. Any sane person can see why he's a backup.
I'm not saying Rush is great, but I am saying he isn't as bad as they made him look yesterday.
I will say it loud and clear, in case you have trouble hearing.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,122
Reaction score
22,616
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
He said exactly what the title of the thread says.
Which, again, does not say he thought they would be better than if Dak had played, just that he thought they would be better in Dak's absence than they were.

But aside from how you want to interpret the words, use some logic. Why would he say say he gave Dak a huge contract and they have been playing Dak even though they felt Rush was a better QB and the team would perform better with Rush than with Dak?

A little logic and common sense goes a long way ...
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,122
Reaction score
22,616
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I'm not saying Rush is great, but I am saying he isn't as bad as they made him look yesterday.
I will say it loud and clear, in case you have trouble hearing.
I agree he isn't as bad as he was yesterday, but for you to suggest that's all you've talked about is nothing more than backpedaling. You've been saying he is a better QB than Dak and the offense will perform better with him at QB.
 

goshann

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,876
Reaction score
1,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
So instead of washing the egg of your Face and scrubbing your dak jammies , your telling us your able to translate Hillbilly ?? cute
Actually I’m saying u aren’t the smartest if you can’t interpret what an 80 year old owner is saying in that video

Get your hands out of your pants and learn something
 

kumizi

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,397
Reaction score
5,882
It was clear what he meant. That even with the starting QB out, he thought they'd be competitive.

We already have enough things to argue about. No reason to make up more drama.
 

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,766
Reaction score
5,961
I agree he isn't as bad as he was yesterday, but for you to suggest that's all you've talked about is nothing more than backpedaling. You've been saying he is a better QB than Dak and the offense will perform better with him at QB.
Overall, they will.
 

Bob-Lillys-War

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,871
Reaction score
27,536
Better without Dak ?


what is wrong with jerry ?

giphy.gif
 

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,766
Reaction score
5,961
Rush has definitely been better than yesterday, but he has never been better than Dak or shown he has the ability to be a starting NFL QB.
That's your opinion, but at least we agree that Rush isn't as bad as he looked yesterday.
 
Top