Jerry is one cowardly old man!

[VA Cowboy]

Well I was wrong in that I thought Bill Parcells would bring us a title ...... I should have taken your advice and just root against the boys ..... that way I would only be dissapointed when they Win .....

You know all about that.

I thought BP would get us farther too. I was wrong.

I don't know of anyone on here that roots against the Cowboys. But carry on with you idiocy...

 

[WoodysGirl]

14. : )

6 for me...

It's all about the settings baby...

 

[Bob Sacamano]

help me kill it WG

this thread must die!!!

 

[iceberg]

In this PC world of ours, anyone can find anything offensive. I can't help that.

i think we'd agree here, and i'd think we'd agree people should get thicker skin more, whine less.

if we can agree there i vote we stop the thread cause we found an agreeing place and go spread love to other parts of the world who have been missing our presence because we've been in here all willingly lowering our collective iq out of boredom. : )

 

[VA Cowboy]

If the coach keeps them that says the coach wants him. Only to a person looking to find something bad like you trying to find a way to say Jerry is forcing them on Phillips would say different

How so? If for instance, Wade didn't want Garrett, it wouldn't be his decision. I'm not saying he doesn't want him, but it is a fact that coaches and be forced onto a HC. Is it not? So therefore an assistant being retained may not necessarily be the HC's call. right?

 

[zrinkill]

But carry on with you idiocy...

My thoughts to you exactly .....

 

[iceberg]

I thought BP would get us farther too. I was wrong.

I don't know of anyone on here that roots against the Cowboys. But carry on with you idiocy...

i'm pretty sure the "idiocy" part will get you a yellow card.

 

[VA Cowboy]

i think we'd agree here, and i'd think we'd agree people should get thicker skin more, whine less.

if we can agree there i vote we stop the thread cause we found an agreeing place and go spread love to other parts of the world who have been missing our presence because we've been in here all willingly lowering our collective iq out of boredom. : )

I can agree to that.

 

[VA Cowboy]

i'm pretty sure the "idiocy" part will get you a yellow card.

It is idiocy to think that any of us root for the Cowboys to lose. There's no better word for it... But push the button if you choose.

 

[zrinkill]

I can agree to that.

Me too ...... for the sake of WG's head if nothing else.

 

[stiletto]

PC - well we may have found a common ground. : ) there are times i think we push PC too far in here but it's the owner of this forum who gets to make those calls simply because they built it - they can do what they want. if you don't like it, leave.

i wish people would just get thicker skins myself, but if i'm to be here i respect the work of the one(s) who make it work, or try to anyway.

then again the owner of a team can't have a say in his staff. that's just idiocy.

Agree 100%. Sites like this tend to violate free speech and freedom of information. Especially since they are publically accessible in the United States and probably run on servers inside the U.S.... that means they are subject to the laws of the constituion, anybody who gets too ticked off with $$$ could probably sue under the proper statutes.

 

[zrinkill]

It is idiocy to think that any of us root for the Cowboys to lose. There's no better word for it... But push the button if you choose.

Then Lets all get behind the new coach untill something bad actually happens?

 

[BigDFan5]

How so? If for instance, Wade didn't want Garrett, it wouldn't be his decision. I'm not saying he doesn't want him, but it is a fact that coaches and be forced onto a HC. Is it not? So therefore an assistant being retained may not necessarily be the HC's call. right?

You werent just saying one coach (He already said he wanted garrett)

You were stating Jones was forcing a staff on him Sparano, Bowles

You have it set up to where if he keeps them you can say they were forced on him

 

[BigDFan5]

Agree 100%. Sites like this tend to violate free speech and freedom of information. Especially since they are publically accessible in the United States and probably run on servers inside the U.S.... that means they are subject to the laws of the constituion, anybody who gets too ticked off with $$$ could probably sue under the proper statutes.

Private run forums are not suject to free speech, the powers that be pay for this site to be up and operate and under the constitution they have a right to run it as they see fit.

You also agreed to terms when signing up

 

[WoodysGirl]

Agree 100%. Sites like this tend to violate free speech and freedom of information. Especially since they are publically accessible in the United States and probably run on servers inside the U.S.... that means they are subject to the laws of the constituion, anybody who gets too ticked off with $$$ could probably sue under the proper statutes.

Huh?

This is a privately-owned site. And as such, the owner and its moderators can run it according to any rules he chooses to do so. That's the cost of doing business.

 

[iceberg]

Agree 100%. Sites like this tend to violate free speech and freedom of information. Especially since they are publically accessible in the United States and probably run on servers inside the U.S.... that means they are subject to the laws of the constituion, anybody who gets too ticked off with $$$ could probably sue under the proper statutes.

then you agree for all the wrong reasons.

whoever built it can run it as they choose. if i don't like it, i'm free to leave or build my own. both of which i've done over the years. : )

this *at times* may be too restrictive FOR ME, but then it's up to me to stay or go, not whine it doesn't fit me 100%.

 

[iceberg]

Huh?

This is a privately-owned site. And as such, the owner and its moderators can run it according to any rules he chooses to do so. That's the cost of doing business.

we've not always agreed, wg - but i got your back 100% here. whoever built it can do w/it as they choose and run it as they see fit.

 

[utrunner07]

I hope everyone is ready for a few more years of 9-7, 8-8.....

Based on what? Becuase you don't like this hire they are automatically going to be 500? Right...well don't come singing Phillips praises if they go 11-5 next year, as for Jerry he could have hired Turner if he wanted a pupet "good ol' boy" coach, Phillips is not.

 

[stiletto]

we've not always agreed, wg - but i got your back 100% here. whoever built it can do w/it as they choose and run it as they see fit.

That's not entirely true. It's not a private site since people can freely sign up. Nothing is outside the reach of the constitution. People "think" that but it isn't always true. But yeah it's the site owners so they make the rules and you gotta respect them...

 

[iceberg]

I thought BP would get us farther too. I was wrong.

I don't know of anyone on here that roots against the Cowboys. But carry on with you idiocy...

um..."your" idiocy???? : )

don't you find it ironic that while you're calling on someone's idiocy that you...

nevermind. you get my point now.