Another interesting angle to this case is the statute of limitations issues. A statute of limitations is a specified period of time after which a claim can no longer be validly filed. The statute of limitations on the plaintiff's cause of action is two years.
However, the Complaint alleges that the statute of limitations was "tolled" by Jerry Jones' absence from the State. Tolling means that the statute of limitations has been legally suspended -- in other words, the clock stops running for a certain period of time (in this case during Jones' absence from the state). A related issue here is whether his periods of absence can be "stacked" to create a tolling period sufficient to defeat the statute of limitations defense.
There are lots of other interesting issues to which I don't haven answers. How can the Cowboys not be dismissed when they are never absent from the state and presumably at all times have a statutory agent to receive service of process? Are there fact issues concerning the statute of limitations issue sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss?
If Jerry's attorneys believe they have a simple statute of limitations defense (as appears to be the case) that would explain why they decided to let her file the case instead of paying her "hush" money. They can get it dismissed on procedural grounds (i.e., limitations) and then claim in public that it was dismissed because it was meritless.