Jerry Jones accused of sexual assault

kimrose · Sep 11, 2014

I am just curious about something, I do not know, haven't seen anything definitive. But in the photos, there is only one girl in each photo, meaning is it possible that they were taking pics of each other? One girl takes the pic, then switches places and the other girl takes the next pic? If it was indeed an entirely separate girl, where are the pics of Uncle Jerry with both of the girls together?? Surely there would have been a few of those, right...?? Is there a picture of the girl who is filing the lawsuit? Or do they really know for a fact that the girl filing is not in any of the pics? That wasn't very clear to me one way or the other when reading the article. Would love clarification if anyone has read or has proof that I have not seen. Thanks.

aria · Sep 11, 2014

Regardless if the alleged victim is making this up or not there is no doubt in my mind what JJ was doing that night. Even if she is just looking for money, which I believe she is, it doesn't make what JJ did acceptable.

Based on the pictures it's pretty clear they weren't "misrepresentative" of anything. In matter of fact they show JJ for exactly what he is, an embarrassment to the Cowboys as an owner and GM, a disgrace to the NFL and a horrible husband.

Reading thorough this thread it boggles my mind how many people not necessarily jump to his defense but more less excuse his actions and automatically call out the "victim" for just looking for money. Again, I agree she is looking for money but let's not overlook the fact that JJ should be held accountable for his actions and held to a higher standard considering his position.

I wish his wife would divorce him and take him for everything he's worth.

Idgit · Sep 11, 2014

Doomsay said:
What married man and representative of an NFL franchise should be in a *****'s closet in the first place?

None. But there's a big difference between assault and philandering.

jobberone · Sep 11, 2014

Billions of dollars makes one very handsome, charming and appealing.

Doomsay · Sep 11, 2014

The whole episode speaks more to his stupidity than his lechery.

jobberone · Sep 11, 2014

Doomsay said:
The whole episode speaks more to his stupidity than his lechery.

I disagree. I think it speaks to both at the very least along with a lot of other stuff on both sides of the fence.

EDIT: sry but left the

off.

Doomsay · Sep 11, 2014

Idgit said:
None. But there's a big difference between assault and philandering.

Yup, find comfort in making that distinction without meaning about the guy you support unabashidly.

Idgit · Sep 11, 2014

Doomsay said:
Yup, find comfort in making that distinction without meaning about the guy you support unabashidly.

You're fishing with no bait, Dooms. Not only are you wrong on my take on Jerry overall, and about my take on his philandering in particular, but you also somehow--and I find this really interesting that you could twist your own reasoning so significantly--make the mistake of equating cheating on a spouse with sexual assault. There's no definition of those two actions where the distinction is meaningless.

Doomsay · Sep 11, 2014

Idgit said:
You're fishing with no bait, Dooms. Not only are you wrong on my take on Jerry overall, and about my take on his philandering in particular, but you also somehow--and I find this really interesting that you could twist your own reasoning so significantly--make the mistake of equating cheating on a spouse with sexual assault. There's no definition of those two actions where the distinction is meaningless.

It's meaningless to distinguish between the acts because both are reprehensible. Procedure 101.

Tawney88 · Sep 11, 2014

Doomsay said:
The whole episode speaks more to his stupidity than his lechery.

Speaks to both imo

Idgit · Sep 12, 2014

Doomsay said:
It's meaningless to distinguish between the acts because both are reprehensible. Procedure 101.

That makes no sense. Both acts are reprehensible. That doesn't make them equivalent. If they're not equivalent, distinguishing between them is meaningful.

BoysFan4ever · Sep 12, 2014

jobberone said:
Billions of dollars makes one very handsome, charming and appealing.

All the money in the world couldn't make Jerry handsome. He's a wrinkled up old prune of a man. Nasty.

BoysFan4ever · Sep 12, 2014

kimrose said:
I am just curious about something, I do not know, haven't seen anything definitive. But in the photos, there is only one girl in each photo, meaning is it possible that they were taking pics of each other? One girl takes the pic, then switches places and the other girl takes the next pic? If it was indeed an entirely separate girl, where are the pics of Uncle Jerry with both of the girls together?? Surely there would have been a few of those, right...?? Is there a picture of the girl who is filing the lawsuit? Or do they really know for a fact that the girl filing is not in any of the pics? That wasn't very clear to me one way or the other when reading the article. Would love clarification if anyone has read or has proof that I have not seen. Thanks.

The only 2 pics I have seen are the 2 that have been published in many places. The blonde getting groped & a brunette kneeling. Some things you cannot unsee...

Jerry looks totally wasted in both.

jobberone · Sep 12, 2014

BoysFan4ever said:
All the money in the world couldn't make Jerry handsome. He's a wrinkled up old prune of a man. Nasty.

You missed the point.

BoysFan4ever · Sep 12, 2014

jobberone said:
You missed the point.

No I didn't. You are saying because he is so wealthy it makes him handsome to those who only see or want money. And it makes him charming & appealing because well he has money.

PA Cowboy Fan · Sep 12, 2014

aria said:
Regardless if the alleged victim is making this up or not there is no doubt in my mind what JJ was doing that night. Even if she is just looking for money, which I believe she is, it doesn't make what JJ did acceptable.

Based on the pictures it's pretty clear they weren't "misrepresentative" of anything. In matter of fact they show JJ for exactly what he is, an embarrassment to the Cowboys as an owner and GM, a disgrace to the NFL and a horrible husband.

Reading thorough this thread it boggles my mind how many people not necessarily jump to his defense but more less excuse his actions and automatically call out the "victim" for just looking for money. Again, I agree she is looking for money but let's not overlook the fact that JJ should be held accountable for his actions and held to a higher standard considering his position.

I wish his wife would divorce him and take him for everything he's worth.

I agree. Like I said I don't care one way or another. Jerry put himself in this situation. It makes no difference to me if he did it or not. I'm not feeling sorry for him. He wants to be a tabloid owner then that's what he got.

tantrix1969 · Sep 12, 2014

kimrose said:
I am just curious about something, I do not know, haven't seen anything definitive. But in the photos, there is only one girl in each photo, meaning is it possible that they were taking pics of each other? One girl takes the pic, then switches places and the other girl takes the next pic? If it was indeed an entirely separate girl, where are the pics of Uncle Jerry with both of the girls together?? Surely there would have been a few of those, right...?? Is there a picture of the girl who is filing the lawsuit? Or do they really know for a fact that the girl filing is not in any of the pics? That wasn't very clear to me one way or the other when reading the article. Would love clarification if anyone has read or has proof that I have not seen. Thanks.

There were definitely 3 girls.
Here are 2 in the pics http://www.tmz.com/2014/08/08/jerry-jones-photos-twitter-women-hire-attorney/
Here is the girl suing Jerry http://www.mstarz.com/articles/3666...-sues-nfl-dallas-cowboys-owner-harassment.htm

kimrose · Sep 12, 2014

BoysFan4ever said:
The only 2 pics I have seen are the 2 that have been published in many places. The blonde getting groped & a brunette kneeling. Some things you cannot unsee...

Jerry looks totally wasted in both.

Yes, he does. The blonde looks like she is x-ing big time. Or would that be called "mollying" today??

kimrose · Sep 12, 2014

tantrix1969 said:
There were definitely 3 girls.
Here are 2 in the pics http://www.tmz.com/2014/08/08/jerry-jones-photos-twitter-women-hire-attorney/
Here is the girl suing Jerry http://www.mstarz.com/articles/3666...-sues-nfl-dallas-cowboys-owner-harassment.htm

Thanks a lot, Tantrix. Yeah, the filer could look like the brunette, but in the pic the girl has brown eyes, and the trashy looking filer has blue. Hadn't seen that pic of the filer, and kind of wish I hadn't of. lol. Yuck. That girl doesn't have a leg to stand on. For sure a money grubber.

BoysFan4ever · Sep 12, 2014

kimrose said:
Yes, he does. The blonde looks like she is x-ing big time. Or would that be called "mollying" today??

They all look plastered. What a great owner we have. Such an upstanding guy.

Jerry Jones accused of sexual assault

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Fattening up

Kane Ala

Well-Known Member

Kane Ala

Well-Known Member

Fattening up

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Fattening up

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Kane Ala

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member