Now...Now. I'm just posing a viewpoint not making a case.
I would think that a person can - and has every right to - state a "viewpoint" in one post. State your opinion and that's that. But when a person is making post after post after post? They're either making a case or arguing for the sake of arguing or trolling.
I trying to give the zone a humble opinion that is no better than anyone else's.
Again, it takes one post to state one's opinion.
I try to use valid points of view from respected scouts and draft sites that explain why the Cowboys usually do certain things. I hear the view often hear that the only move at #4 is taking a QB and any old QB whether he's ready to backup Romo in a game or not.
You'll need to clarify what you're saying here, I'm not understanding what you're trying to say.
Also, what makes you think that any of these QB's would be a worthy backup given the QB coaching we have in Dallas. I saw the results of that last year.
I'm not expecting any of these quarterbacks to be a "worthy backup" this year. That's not why I draft them. If that's your expectation, you'd never draft one.
My take is that I would rather supply Marinelli with players than the one coach who must have something on Jason Garrett.
And that just
has to include the #4 overall pick? What one defensive player is there that you couldn't
possibly get anywhere else?
I can show you the success rate for early round quarterbacks vs later round quarterbacks and I can illustrate that you cannot get a starting quarterback in free agency. Can you show me the same about any other position? Not when guys like Cousins and Bradford just got $18-$19 million you can't.