News: Jerry Jones Says “No” Decision Yet Regarding Romo’s Future in Dallas *MERGE*

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
We get those same savings with a trade.......cutting Romo is plain dumb.... he is worth more as a back up than a straight release and if he doesn't like it he can retire and we get 12m back from his signing bonus

Sorry but a backup is not worth $17m; quite the contrary.

I am not saying that getting something in trade is not better or that we need to be in a hurry. The deadline is the first game of the season when salaries become guaranteed.
 

RJ_MacReady

It's all in the reflexes
Messages
3,974
Reaction score
7,123
"Well...can we keep him as a backup?"

018-Donald-Moffat-Garry-John-Carpenter-The-Thing-Das-Ding_tn.jpg

"He's GONE, MacReady!"
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,981
Reaction score
48,728
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I guess you haven't been properly introduced to blumayne. He thinks Romo should be inserted back as the starter.
Time to move on.:laugh:
Nothing against Romo at all, but that's how it is.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Sorry but a backup is not worth $17m; quite the contrary.

I am not saying that getting something in trade is not better or that we need to be in a hurry. The deadline is the first game of the season when salaries become guaranteed.
First off it is only 14m
And B it can be renegotiated or restructured down dramatically

Either way the best outcomes come after June 1st unless we get blown away with a draft pick package for this year
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
First off it is only 14m
And B it can be renegotiated or restructured down dramatically

Either way the best outcomes come after June 1st unless we get blown away with a draft pick package for this year

restructured just means you pay it later. it still ends up costing you and he only has 3 years on his deal.

why would he renegotiate?
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
restructured just means you pay it later. it still ends up costing you and he only has 3 years on his deal.

why would he renegotiate?
He already said he would .......he would get more guaranteed money and possibly more say in his destination or role for less of a cap hit
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
He already said he would .......he would get more guaranteed money and possibly more say in his destination or role for less of a cap hit

He said he would do that to facilitate a trade. He did not say he would renegotiate to stay on as backup.

He already knows he is going to get the $14m if he stays and does not renegotiate. Guaranteeing him more than that is absurd.

If you get him to take a renegotiation to $5m AAV then sure but that is not going to happen.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
He said he would do that to facilitate a trade. He did not say he would renegotiate to stay on as backup.

He already knows he is going to get the $14m if he stays and does not renegotiate. Guaranteeing him more than that is absurd.

If you get him to take a renegotiation to $5m AAV then sure but that is not going to happen.
He can take per game incentives to recoup some money but if he stays it is as a bak up

Not one person knows what is going to happen, so saying something is out is very premature
 
Top