Jerry Jones the business man

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,829
Reaction score
22,516
He's been doing more moving on than winning as of late.
Jerry circles the wagons and comes to consensus as to team directions. Once in that direction, he sticks to it until things prove not as planned. I think a four to five year consideration is in effect. Two seasons into the playoffs in the past four, and this is the slotted confidence rider for his Coach.

Right now, it's even odds for success, but the roster is strong. Final adjustments to applied next off season...either in final players or coach.

Both sides of the ball as well...
 

Ranching

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,110
Reaction score
111,512
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Jerry circles the wagons and comes to consensus as to team directions. Once in that direction, he sticks to it until things prove not as planned. I think a four to five year consideration is in effect. Two seasons into the playoffs in the past four, and this is the slotted confidence rider for his Coach.

Right now, it's even odds for success, but the roster is strong. Final adjustments to applied next off season...either in final players or coach.

Both sides of the ball as well...
I like Jerry, I just don't like what he has become. He's not Gonna a hit another ********** with without digging a new well.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,829
Reaction score
22,516
I like Jerry, I just don't like what he has become. He's not Gonna a hit another ********** with without digging a new well.

So you also imply this current team is unable as is, to have full heart and the mental commitment to make it happen? Not me...I'm talking players, and not an excuse instead of their head coach.
 

Jumbo075

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,045
Reaction score
7,542
Yeah, because $19 million in cap space is how you get a billion to invest elsewhere. :facepalm:

The Cowboys don't have $19M in CAP space. They have about $13M, and are trying to trade for Earl Thomas, who will cost them about $8.5M of that CAP space. If there was EVER a false allegation against Jerry, it's the notion he's not willing to spend money on Cowboys players. It's laughable that he's "pocketing" the $13M. The Cowboys had over $840M in revenue last year, and some think Jerry's worried about 1.5% of that. Such a ridiculous assertion.

And all that revenue doesn't include Jerry's income from oil & gas.

Also, any salary cap money unspent rolls over to the next year, and allows the Cowboys to resign players like David Irving, Damien Wilson, DeMarcus Lawrence, Dak Prescott, Cole Beasley, Tavon Austin, etc. all of whom have contracts that expire after this season. Jerry is not taking ANY money from the pool of resources dedicated to players. In fact, he invests money outside the salary cap for players. According to Forbes magazine, last year Jones spent $196M for player expenses - far above the Salary CAP limits.
 

Ranching

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,110
Reaction score
111,512
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
So you also imply this current team is unable as is, to have full heart and the mental commitment to make it happen? Not me...I'm talking players, and not an excuse instead of their head coach.
The head coach is the problem. We have good players, but need a new coach to make them great. Jerry buying into a 13-3 last place schedule season two years ago and letting Dez and Witten walk without upgrades has me concerned. 19 million in cap space and no upgrades? That's not the wildcatter that won us three superbowls.
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,123
Reaction score
22,616
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I knew it. He is replacing high priced players with office buildings. No wonder he is sitting on all that cap space and didn’t want to spend money to improve the team. Embracing the youth is just a euphemism for “I need every penny I can get my hands on right now”.

This post may be meant to be taken tongue in cheek, but if not, it should be understood that the Dallas Cowboys are a separate entity for other of Jerry's businesses, and with its own revenues and expenses and its own budget. Plus, that $13 million in unused cap space wouldn't be more than a tiny, barely perceptible blip in a $1.5 billion project.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,829
Reaction score
22,516
The head coach is the problem. We have good players, but need a new coach to make them great. Jerry buying into a 13-3 last place schedule season two years ago and letting Dez and Witten walk without upgrades has me concerned. 19 million in cap space and no upgrades? That's not the wildcatter that won us three superbowls.

KC: Looking at Dak Prescott, he averaged 9.8 vertical yards per attempt in 2017. That’s not a good number for vertical passes. That ranked 25th last year. Those only accounted for 27% of his total passes. That’s also a very low number. That’s 30th. He just didn’t air it out very often. That’s a lower percentage of deep attempts than guys like Alex Smith, or Kirk Cousins. That’s even fewer than Blake Bortles. Part of it is that Dez Bryant had abysmal metrics last year. He had atrocious metrics, so much so that I think he alone crippled the vertical passing game. He ranked next to last out of 86 qualifying wide receivers in vertical yards per attempt, this is passes more than eleven yards downfield. Only Zay Jones, who had one of the worst seasons I’ve ever seen a starting receiver with heavy targets have since I’ve been doing this was worse, and Dez Bryant was only a half step ahead of him.

Bryant ranked 70th in stretch yards per attempt at 7.8 on passes, those thrown 20 or more yards down the field. We talked about the fortune points metric. With offensive fortune points, which is how often you lost points to bad luck on your part – you dropped a pass, he lost 39.5 points in PPR fantasy leagues which is an incredibly high number. I’m looking up the specifics on his fortune points. If we’re talking vertical passes, and that’s why you pay Dez Bryant the money, for vertical production. You don’t hire the guy to catch short passes. He had 26 plays in 2017 where there was some sort of bad luck or error, for the whole season. Thirteen of those were short passes, under ten yards downfield. That’s not good but if you’re dropping short passes the team can deal with that.

Here he is on vertical attempts on throws eleven or more yards downfield. Of those thirteen plays, eight were straight up drops on his part. And the ninth was an inaccurate pass that he dropped. You can put that one on the QB. The other four were inaccurate passes. And one of those that I graded as inaccurate because the rush affected the throw. The other three were misses by Dak. And the thing is, of those thirteen passes, eleven of them were in the medium range, eleven to nineteen yards downfield. Only two were deep, 20 to 29 yards. None were over 30-yard attempts, that I call bomb pass attempts. What does that say to me if I’m looking at it? Why didn’t he have more misses in the deeper ranges? It’s because he wasn’t getting open...

http://profootballtalkline.com/nfl-...ed-the-cowboys-2017-deep-passing-attack.html/



Now, who was it that figured that part out and put into effect a different scheme with new players to execute? What is the denominator of change for this group of receivers?
 

cern

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,900
Reaction score
21,050
I knew it. He is replacing high priced players with office buildings. No wonder he is sitting on all that cap space and didn’t want to spend money to improve the team. Embracing the youth is just a euphemism for “I need every penny I can get my hands on right now”.
nfl cap money and what jerry spends on real estate investing are in no way mutually exclusive. I suspect his line of credit is hundreds of millions with the banks and his credit rating as good as it gets. cap money is for the cowboys football team, not intended for real estate projects.
 

Ranching

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,110
Reaction score
111,512
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
KC: Looking at Dak Prescott, he averaged 9.8 vertical yards per attempt in 2017. That’s not a good number for vertical passes. That ranked 25th last year. Those only accounted for 27% of his total passes. That’s also a very low number. That’s 30th. He just didn’t air it out very often. That’s a lower percentage of deep attempts than guys like Alex Smith, or Kirk Cousins. That’s even fewer than Blake Bortles. Part of it is that Dez Bryant had abysmal metrics last year. He had atrocious metrics, so much so that I think he alone crippled the vertical passing game. He ranked next to last out of 86 qualifying wide receivers in vertical yards per attempt, this is passes more than eleven yards downfield. Only Zay Jones, who had one of the worst seasons I’ve ever seen a starting receiver with heavy targets have since I’ve been doing this was worse, and Dez Bryant was only a half step ahead of him.

Bryant ranked 70th in stretch yards per attempt at 7.8 on passes, those thrown 20 or more yards down the field. We talked about the fortune points metric. With offensive fortune points, which is how often you lost points to bad luck on your part – you dropped a pass, he lost 39.5 points in PPR fantasy leagues which is an incredibly high number. I’m looking up the specifics on his fortune points. If we’re talking vertical passes, and that’s why you pay Dez Bryant the money, for vertical production. You don’t hire the guy to catch short passes. He had 26 plays in 2017 where there was some sort of bad luck or error, for the whole season. Thirteen of those were short passes, under ten yards downfield. That’s not good but if you’re dropping short passes the team can deal with that.

Here he is on vertical attempts on throws eleven or more yards downfield. Of those thirteen plays, eight were straight up drops on his part. And the ninth was an inaccurate pass that he dropped. You can put that one on the QB. The other four were inaccurate passes. And one of those that I graded as inaccurate because the rush affected the throw. The other three were misses by Dak. And the thing is, of those thirteen passes, eleven of them were in the medium range, eleven to nineteen yards downfield. Only two were deep, 20 to 29 yards. None were over 30-yard attempts, that I call bomb pass attempts. What does that say to me if I’m looking at it? Why didn’t he have more misses in the deeper ranges? It’s because he wasn’t getting open...

http://profootballtalkline.com/nfl-...ed-the-cowboys-2017-deep-passing-attack.html/



Now, who was it that figured that part out and put into effect a different scheme with new players to execute? What is the denominator of change for this group of receivers?
A pee wee league coach could have figured that out. What has been done to fix is my concern. Anyone can see the past. Duh!!
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,829
Reaction score
22,516
A pee wee league coach could have figured that out. What has been done to fix is my concern. Anyone can see the past. Duh!!
If you would rather not discuss actual remedies and just put down Jason Garrett...I guess that means a red headed bias, right?

Dak friendly...

5.) Addition of speed on offense/ short passing game

4.) Starless Wide Receiver group/competition for Dak’s trust

3.) The Cowboys re-tooled offensive line/better depth than perception suggests

2.) The Cowboys defense may be scary good

1.) Ezekiel Elliott’s Revenge Tour

https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/201...ns-the-cowboys-are-more-dak-friendly-for-2018

I was always told, while in service, KISS. Keep it simple, stupid...
 
Last edited:

dallasdave

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,326
Reaction score
88,063
The head coach is the problem. We have good players, but need a new coach to make them great. Jerry buying into a 13-3 last place schedule season two years ago and letting Dez and Witten walk without upgrades has me concerned. 19 million in cap space and no upgrades? That's not the wildcatter that won us three superbowls.
:dance::dance::dance:Whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 

Ranching

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,110
Reaction score
111,512
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
If you would rather not discuss actual remedies and just put down Jason Garrett...I guess that means a red headed bias, right?

Dak friendly...

5.) Addition of speed on offense/ short passing game

4.) Starless Wide Receiver group/competition for Dak’s trust

3.) The Cowboys re-tooled offensive line/better depth than perception suggests

2.) The Cowboys defense may be scary good

1.) Ezekiel Elliott’s Revenge Tour

https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/201...ns-the-cowboys-are-more-dak-friendly-for-2018

I was always told, while in service, KISS. Keep it simple, stupid...
Not putting down Garrett this time, just saying it didn't take a genius to see what was wrong. The real genuis comes in fixing it. I don't need a bunch of cut and paste articles to know what our issues are. As far as KISS, unfortunately,with salary caps stupid people need not apply.
 

Chrispierce

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,001
Reaction score
3,851
He likes real estate developmemt projects. So do I. The Jones family is very corporate,and about selling “the brand”...but I’d rather they put more focus on “the team” and winning football,or better yet,let football people run the team and they deal with corporate ventures and selling the brand.
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
Comstock Resources Inc. has been a bummer over the past few years. While the debt-strapped company didn't file for bankruptcy like many of its peers when oil prices tumbled (it swapped part of its bonds with convertible notes instead), it entertained a move earlier this month that would dilute shareholders, sending its stock down 17% to $6.06 per share. Its shares spent the rest of the month deflating to close at $4.76 yesterday.

All that changed today, when the company announced that it was negotiating with billionaire Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones to make a "substantial" investment in the company.

Under a letter of intent signed with Jones' oil and gas companies, Arkoma Drilling and Williston Drilling, Frisco, Texas-based Comstock will buy interests in oil and gas properties in North Dakota for $620 million in stock (there's no debt associated with the assets).

As a result, Arkoma would receive 88.6 million newly issued shares of Comstock common stock based on an agreed upon share price of $7 per share, giving it an 84% stake in the company.





A definitive agreement could come in a few weeks and Comstock stockholders will have to approve it.

Wall Street cheered the deal, pushing the company's shares up more than 50% at one point. They ended up closing at $6.98 per share, up 46.6%.

The reason? The properties Comstock is buying produce a lot of oil – 10,500 barrels per day – that would balance out its natural gas-weighted portfolio, which includes fields in East Texas' and northern Louisiana's Haynesville shale. The assets are expected to generate $200 million in operating cash flow this year.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/claire...s-big-bet-on-comstock-resources/#1821a89f3578
Whew& WoW-Wee,,,Man Alive!,,,from a cursory glance skimming the posted article, that is 'Knocking the hide off of the sizzling fastball with major piece of Big Wood':starspin:

*I had "pumped" one oil well that had came in @ over 1,000 bbls per day,,,FLOWING,,,it tapered off and still flowed over 400 bbls per day for several months,,, the imported price per bbl of crude was just a few cents shy of $65 per bbl in July 2018,,,er,,,o_O:starspin:o_O
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
Comstock Resources Inc. has been a bummer over the past few years. While the debt-strapped company didn't file for bankruptcy like many of its peers when oil prices tumbled (it swapped part of its bonds with convertible notes instead), it entertained a move earlier this month that would dilute shareholders, sending its stock down 17% to $6.06 per share. Its shares spent the rest of the month deflating to close at $4.76 yesterday.

All that changed today, when the company announced that it was negotiating with billionaire Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones to make a "substantial" investment in the company.

Under a letter of intent signed with Jones' oil and gas companies, Arkoma Drilling and Williston Drilling, Frisco, Texas-based Comstock will buy interests in oil and gas properties in North Dakota for $620 million in stock (there's no debt associated with the assets).

As a result, Arkoma would receive 88.6 million newly issued shares of Comstock common stock based on an agreed upon share price of $7 per share, giving it an 84% stake in the company.





A definitive agreement could come in a few weeks and Comstock stockholders will have to approve it.

Wall Street cheered the deal, pushing the company's shares up more than 50% at one point. They ended up closing at $6.98 per share, up 46.6%.

The reason? The properties Comstock is buying produce a lot of oil – 10,500 barrels per day – that would balance out its natural gas-weighted portfolio, which includes fields in East Texas' and northern Louisiana's Haynesville shale. The assets are expected to generate $200 million in operating cash flow this year.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/claire...s-big-bet-on-comstock-resources/#1821a89f3578
This rates as the COOLEST non-football related post I've been privileged to have perused on this FORUM,,, @LocimusPrime :thumbup::bow:
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
Comstock Resources Inc. has been a bummer over the past few years. While the debt-strapped company didn't file for bankruptcy like many of its peers when oil prices tumbled (it swapped part of its bonds with convertible notes instead), it entertained a move earlier this month that would dilute shareholders, sending its stock down 17% to $6.06 per share. Its shares spent the rest of the month deflating to close at $4.76 yesterday.

All that changed today, when the company announced that it was negotiating with billionaire Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones to make a "substantial" investment in the company.

Under a letter of intent signed with Jones' oil and gas companies, Arkoma Drilling and Williston Drilling, Frisco, Texas-based Comstock will buy interests in oil and gas properties in North Dakota for $620 million in stock (there's no debt associated with the assets).

As a result, Arkoma would receive 88.6 million newly issued shares of Comstock common stock based on an agreed upon share price of $7 per share, giving it an 84% stake in the company.





A definitive agreement could come in a few weeks and Comstock stockholders will have to approve it.

Wall Street cheered the deal, pushing the company's shares up more than 50% at one point. They ended up closing at $6.98 per share, up 46.6%.

The reason? The properties Comstock is buying produce a lot of oil – 10,500 barrels per day – that would balance out its natural gas-weighted portfolio, which includes fields in East Texas' and northern Louisiana's Haynesville shale. The assets are expected to generate $200 million in operating cash flow this year.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/claire...s-big-bet-on-comstock-resources/#1821a89f3578
The marketability of the vast quantities of natural gas this nation sits upon is complex& labor intensive,,,while, nuclear power plants are an absolutely insane concept of thought let alone implementation to those of long term& far ranging future vision, HISTORY will prove this true ,,,er,,,should the dominant species of radiation resistant cockroach's even care to write ito_O

*personal MelonFeudian worded view
 
Top