Zaxor said:
Sorry again I must have misunderstood the question...I will try to answer it this time...I think continuity is important in most cases...but I do not see a major need in it now...we are only one year into the 3-4 so not a major set back there and the offense needs to be blown up anyway imho so no lose there... I think it would be more beneficial to have a long term coaching prospect with a plan...than a short term coach with a quick fix/short-term offense in mind...
Let me give you a specific case. Over the next month, BP retires (or decides the grass is greener in Detroit). Zimmer gets the HC job in Oakland and the Texans hire Payton. That would be OK with you, right?
I think that scenario is a disaster and we give up any hope of the playoffs for 3 plus years. Without any continuity, we take huge steps backward and our record drops back into the 6-10 range. Our next season schedule is a killer. Who will manage the draft? You want to go back to Jerry Jones managing that process?
I suppose you could hold up the Gruden/Dungy situation in TB as an example of how a transition could work well. I think a much more probable result is a poor transition like Sherman/Holmgren.
Respectfully, I disagree with your logic and I think the consequences of following your ideas would be a colossal mistake for the organization. There is a lot of discussion going on to fire this guy or get rid of that guy, but I have some real fear of what is going to happen over the next month at Valley Ranch.