75boyz
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,060
- Reaction score
- 9,724
I'm only stating that a HC job and main responsibility is not as play caller. Some HC do but his responsibility is not as you say walk around coach. In terms of calling plays, I don't think that is as big of an issue than trying to piece meal an OL together than can actually play together for more than 1 week. When you got guys falling like flies on your OL you will have break downs and there is not a lot of plays in the playbook that requires little to no blocking. I would also add Moore is not developing game plans by himself, McCarthy is a big part of putting together a strategy and game plan together as is the case on all teams. Football is never a 1 man show there are lot of parts involved. You want to say to this point they have not done a good job, I will not disagree but it gets old having 1 or 2 people scapegoated
Can not disagree with a lot of your team infrastructire breakdowns and the differing responsibilities associated with those breakdowns.
Where I may differ with is the term scapegoat.
McCarthy is not some stoolie who is absolved of all responsibility for having his team prepared, motivated and focused. This includes accountability for the performance of all coaches and players.
This type of accountability is a foreign word within the organization starting with its owner/GM thus creating a toxic trickle down effect where it's always a guessing game as to whose responsibility is it for what.
Even his championship season at GB is said to have included a great deal of season ending injuries to IR so while as you say, this is extreme and I agree, it is not new to him.
I believe his win totals at GB centered around Rodgers ability not his coaching. His defenses sucked. Especially in the playoffs.
"Except" for the one trophy year.
I believe he was a poor choice and largely responsible for most of this as I told you my opinion on responsibility/accountability as a HC already.
No worries.
Difference of opinion.
Cheers