Jerry vs David Mulugheta

Coogiguy03

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,158
Reaction score
38,388
Who you got, who will be the one that gets their way in the contract talks with Pickens and his other clients going forward. David is a tough cookie, he's the Drew Rosenhaus of this time frame. I think Jerry has met his match, who you got Jerry or David??
 
Coogiguy03 said:
Who you got, who will be the one that gets their way in the contract talks with Pickens and his other clients going forward. David is a tough cookie, he's the Drew Rosenhaus of this time frame. I think Jerry has met his match, who you got Jerry or David??
Click to expand...
The Cowboys win no matter what. Starting with Parsons, things got ridiculous, both sides acted immaturely, and it turned into a circus. In the end, the Cowboys walked away with great assets—extra money, draft picks, and players.

So why worry? Who cares who wins? Both sides do. If we lose Pickens, he gets his way, gets paid, and goes somewhere else, hoping that the money is enough. But if he ends up in another Pittsburgh-like situation, he won’t get the production, respect, or involvement in the offense he wants. If it’s just about money, sure, he’ll win, and the Cowboys will still come out with a first-round pick and an extra $35 million to quickly rebuild, plus they can draft another receiver. Other teams have traded their top receivers without even having someone like CeeDee Lamb still on the team,

so I’m not worried—both sides win here.

Pickens is a great asset, just like Parsons, which is exactly why the Cowboys will be fine. I don’t see this as a win-loss for either side. Ideally, they’d reach an agreement and both recognize the value of staying together, but if it comes to a trade, I’m okay with it.

I’ve said this before, and while we didn’t need yet another Pickens thread, here we are. At this point, I might just keep copying and pasting my rant for anyone new who hasn’t seen it yet.
 
big dog cowboy said:
History suggests the Cowboys players win because Jerry outbids himself.

It's more of Jerry vs. Jerry and not Jerry vs. Mulugheta.
Click to expand...
I disagree, and in a way is Jerry versus Jerry,

because Dave is much like him they both have big egos and are not afraid to push the threshold to the court of public opinion, they don't mind the circus, They don't mind the stare down, and they don't care about the results, because in this case just like Parsons both sides will win..

Jerry should be able to get a fine draft pick and a lot of extra money to spend on the team is not desperate, in this case ,in my opinion and, I believe he knows this we still have CD Lamb and Dak Prescott and they've done it before without having this insurance policy at WR2...2023 is great example and IMHO not even in a better scheme, that I do believe we have now going in a year 2 installment.

Yes it would be lovely to have George Pickens, but not if it's a blank check situation and they're pushing this as if this is Jamar Chase or Justin Jefferson or CD Lamb as the primaries, fighting for their big contract,

this not the case the Cowboys already have their guy they don't have to sign George Pickens this is not 2018 when they were forced mid-season to go get Amari Cooper, they already have a prime CD lamb..

So if he was willing to do it with Parsons without having protection from another star defensive end he for sure would easily move on from George Pickens the Seals already been broken It's not something you would have thought Jerry would have done and in this case he has more leverage he has less to worry about because he has CD Lamb..
 
Well who won the first round? He got his client paid but apparently didn’t get his client on the team he wanted. Jerry pulled the trigger on trading him and had the worst defense in the league. He did end up with Clark and two firsts. Both lost and won?
 
TheMarathonContinues said:
Well who won the first round? He got his client paid but apparently didn’t get his client on the team he wanted. Jerry pulled the trigger on trading him and had the worst defense in the league. He did end up with Clark and two firsts. Both lost and won?
Click to expand...
its a tie until further notice.. Still more moving parts, by the way they used one of those picks on QWilliams.. so far, its Clark, Williams, and anther 1st TBD.

But yes, Parsons got his way he got his money he got on a playoff team, but he also got a bad ACL which you can't really include in this, but it did happen...

But this will take about three seasons to develop into seeing if one side one or the other it will be the same thing with George Pickens the Cowboys will come out smelling like roses with a first round draft pick and saving all that cash to help the rest of the team.

So, whether you keep him or trade him both sides will get what they want I call it a tie when you have assets like this both sides should win That equals a tie..
 
big dog cowboy said:
History suggests the Cowboys players win because Jerry outbids himself.

It's more of Jerry vs. Jerry and not Jerry vs. Mulugheta.
Click to expand...
But he changed in the Parsons trade that was not normal he did not get forced/extorted into keeping him at all costs,

he finally did something that was right for the team and what was going to be fan friendly or get positive feedback from the media...

And in this case, they still have CD lamp this is different they didn't even have another option at defensive end and he did it.

So, what makes you think he won't do it this time if he thinks he can get a high first round pick and save $35 million why would any smart GM not consider that versus overpaying somebody that's trying to extort them for more money because they think that it will be blowback from the media and fan base.
 
Coogiguy03 said:
Who you got, who will be the one that gets their way in the contract talks with Pickens and his other clients going forward. David is a tough cookie, he's the Drew Rosenhaus of this time frame. I think Jerry has met his match, who you got Jerry or David??
Click to expand...
It’s gonna be a mess. Jerry still is feeling the lashes of the last two Todd France butt whippings he got for Dak’s contracts. Give me David. He got Parsons his money and he will get Pickens his.
 
blueblood70 said:
I disagree, and in a way is Jerry versus Jerry,

because Dave is much like him they both have big egos and are not afraid to push the threshold to the court of public opinion, they don't mind the circus, They don't mind the stare down, and they don't care about the results, because in this case just like Parsons both sides will win..

Jerry should be able to get a fine draft pick and a lot of extra money to spend on the team is not desperate, in this case ,in my opinion and, I believe he knows this we still have CD Lamb and Dak Prescott and they've done it before without having this insurance policy at WR2...2023 is great example and IMHO not even in a better scheme, that I do believe we have now going in a year 2 installment.

Yes it would be lovely to have George Pickens, but not if it's a blank check situation and they're pushing this as if this is Jamar Chase or Justin Jefferson or CD Lamb as the primaries, fighting for their big contract,

this not the case the Cowboys already have their guy they don't have to sign George Pickens this is not 2018 when they were forced mid-season to go get Amari Cooper, they already have a prime CD lamb..

So if he was willing to do it with Parsons without having protection from another star defensive end he for sure would easily move on from George Pickens the Seals already been broken It's not something you would have thought Jerry would have done and in this case he has more leverage he has less to worry about because he has CD Lamb..
Click to expand...
Mulugheta is a professional. He is only interested in the value of his clients’ contracts. If his client has additional wishes or concerns he’s going to defer to his client and represent his client’s interests.

Jerry has the other 52 players on the roster and the business of an entire franchise to worry about. If it gets personal it will only be because Jerry Jones makes it so. Comments like “I don’t even know his agent’s name” is at best unprofessional. Jerry Jones is a damned fool.
 
KingCorcoran said:
Mulugheta is a professional. He is only interested in the value of his clients’ contracts. If his client has additional wishes or concerns he’s going to defer to his client and represent his client’s interests.

Jerry has the other 52 players on the roster and the business of an entire franchise to worry about. If it gets personal it will only be because Jerry Jones makes it so. Comments like “I don’t even know his agent’s name” is at best unprofessional. Jerry Jones is a damned fool.
Click to expand...
I believe everyone would agree with what's bolded!! lol
 
Coogiguy03 said:
I think Jerry has met his match, who you got Jerry or David??
Click to expand...
pOL9Dyh.gif


Just switch 'NFL' to 'Player Agent'. Same thing.
 
Who cares as long as Pickens gets signed and stays here.

Then the FANS win.
 
blueblood70 said:
The Cowboys win no matter what. Starting with Parsons, things got ridiculous, both sides acted immaturely, and it turned into a circus. In the end, the Cowboys walked away with great assets—extra money, draft picks, and players.
Click to expand...
You forgot that the agent walked away with the richest contract for a defensive player in NFL history. Small footnote.
 
jazzcat22 said:
Who cares as long as Pickens gets signed and stays here.

Then the FANS win.
Click to expand...
I mentioned Joe Bonamassa, you mentioned someone else I forgot their name. Can you tell me again, please when you get a minute.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 4 more.
Total: 19,213 (members: 104, guests: 19,109)
Robots: 995

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,029
Messages
14,507,715
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top