817Gill
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,141
- Reaction score
- 19,113
What does that’s even mean lolA Dallas Cowboys fan wrote that.
Don't blame him. Blame Jerry.
What does that’s even mean lolA Dallas Cowboys fan wrote that.
Don't blame him. Blame Jerry.
I actually think a guy like Greg Williams would be nice hire. He has coached the Saints defense to a SB and he is finally clear of the bounty crap. How about Mike Shanahan. He knows how to use a good running game and is a good at preparing a team and making adjustments. I would of been fine seeing Ken Wisenhunt come in and work with Dak
That is just pathetic. Anyone would be an improvement over Garrett. He is HORRID at the football thing. Getting rid of Garrett also means getting rid of this horrid offense. Its like killing two birds with one stone. I think we can see quite clearly that as long as Garrett is here, we will have some form or another of his boring, horrid, predictable, beat the man in front of you, offense. We will get dumb decisions like hiring a one year QB coach to call plays.
I know the OP isn't a fan of Dak so maybe I'm reading this post with bias, but it seems like one of the many post @erod makes that title has nothing to with Dak, but when you read it, it's about Dak . Lol just seems like it's saying, doesn't matter what coach or offense you bring in because it won't work with Dak. Could be wrong though .
I agree his skill set is better suited to be GM. I believe it’s his influence over personnel which has been the difference.So you live your life based on pessimism? It could be worse, but it could be better. Embrace the mediocrity because the unknown is scary? Wow, that sounds like an amazing life philosophy. How many more players need to have wasted careers to prove that Garrett just doesn't have what it takes to HC? Honestly, I think his skillset is better suited to GM or scouting.
I used to believe in Garrett. I used to defend him. No more.
I'm not defending Garrett, but it's accurate. Nobody hired has shown to be any better than what Garrett has done.
On this one, we're on other planets at opposite sides of the sun.
I see nothing like that today.
I do get why you'd say that, but the basis for saying that went away a long time ago. Jerry first swallowed a big dose of his pride when he allowed Parcells into the inner kingdom for the time that he did.
Then, any residual quest for pride remaining in Jerry was quenched when he put on the gold jacket. Regardless how any of us on the outside see it, in his mind (which is the only place that matters to this vein of discussion), Jerry has no detractors anymore that he has to actually regard as legitimate.
With Red, it's not about Jerry getting credit as-if he needs anyone's acclaim at this point, but it might very much be about Garrett being like a son to him... and the pride that comes from seeing someone who you regard that way succeeding.
Of course, it is a business. And Stephen will remind Jerry of that after next season if Garrett hasn't made it to the NFC championship game. The adopted son will be asked to step aside for someone else.
Nonsense. Linehan was definitely a step above Garrett.
I beg to differ, no one looks at JJ as a "football" guy even though he's in the HoF. Do you think that he made the HoF do to what he's done inside the lines? No he didn't he got in for his contributions to the NFL (tv contracts, endorsement deals), JJ is still trying to prove the world wrong as far as football is concerned.
Oh brother.
The Rams offense is run oriented. They run the ball just as much or more than the Cowboys do. It's just that when they do pass, their systems and schemes are far superior and more effective than the stale mess in Dallas.
Same goes with the Saints who actually run the ball more than Dallas does.
Smart analysts and ex-players have stated that Garrett wouldn't land a coaching job if Jerry cut him this year .
Here is an example :
That's what Jerry has hoped Garrett would become.