Jimmy Johnson Says Terrell Owens Is No Longer a Great Player

Arch Stanton

it was the grave marked unknown right beside
Messages
6,474
Reaction score
0
Jimmy Johnson Says Terrell Owens Is No Longer a Great Player

By Larry DiTore

Jan. 16 (Bloomberg) -- The Dallas Cowboys may be better off without outspoken wide receiver Terrell Owens, according to a former coach who led the team to two Super Bowl wins.

Owens, a six-time Pro Bowl selection and five-time All-Pro, is no longer the “great player” he once was and his behavior may be more hindrance than help, said Jimmy Johnson, who led the Cowboys to National Football League titles after the 1992 and 1993 seasons.

“He used to be an outstanding player, a great player,” Johnson said in an interview with Bloomberg Radio’s “On the Ball” program airing tomorrow. “He is still a good player, but you have to weigh the distractions and whether or not he divides the locker room and the problems that he has.”

ESPN reported this week that the team is considering releasing Owens during the offseason.

The 35-year-old Owens, who ranks second in NFL history with 139 career touchdowns catches, complained about his role in the offense during the Cowboys’ 9-7 season after Dallas was picked as a Super Bowl favorite in some preseason predictions.

Owens had 69 catches for 1,052 yards and 10 touchdowns this season while appearing in all 16 games for Dallas, down from the 1,355 yards and 15 touchdowns from the previous year.

Owens clashed with former Cowboys coach Bill Parcells after signing with the team in 2006. He was rushed to the hospital after an adverse reaction to prescription painkillers and supplements in September of that year, denying initial media reports that he attempted suicide.

McNabb Clash

Prior to joining the Cowboys, Owens was banned from the Philadelphia Eagles midway through the 2005 season for criticizing quarterback Donovan McNabb. He clashed with quarterback Jeff Garcia when they were teammates on the San Francisco 49ers.

“You’ve got to look and you’ve got to weigh what he contributes to the team,” said Johnson, now an NFL pregame analyst for New Corp.’s Fox network. ‘Without question, if you have Terrell Owens on your team, it keeps your team in the headlines, but I don’t know that he’s a great player right now.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Larry DiTore in New York at lditore@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: January 16, 2009 11:39 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601079&sid=afwyNFWMCUT8&refer=amsports
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
So Jimmy Johnson has pretty much implied that he would take a locker-room cancer, if he was a 'great' player....
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
khiladi;2579836 said:
So Jimmy Johnson has pretty much implied that he would take a locker-room cancer, if he was a 'great' player....

He did in the past. He even drafted some not so great players that were cancers.
 

ddh33

Active Member
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
2
That is exactly how I feel about it. At some point, the player's talent isn't worth the headache that the player causes.

Pacman Jones is one example.

I think TO is another example. I understand that TO and Pacman are two different kinds of characters; I don't mean to make the comparison in that way. But I think TO brings a lot of other issues to a team, and I don't know if those issues are worth it anymore.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
Next year is going to be hilarious. If T.O. does well and the team does well, none of the people talking mess now will say jack.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
TheCount;2579869 said:
Next year is going to be hilarious. If T.O. does well and the team does well, none of the people talking mess now will say jack.

Or if he's cut or traded they will be saying it was a mistake just like they did with Fasano.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
One thing I know for sure if you play man up on TO you are going to get burned. Teams still have enough respect for TO ability to make sure he has cover under and over on him. I'm not going to say TO ability is the same as it was 5 or 6 years ago but it is still to the point where he has to be accounted for ask those coaches who choose to man up on him this past season.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Doomsday101;2579878 said:
One thing I know for sure if you play man up on TO you are going to get burned. Teams still have enough respect for TO ability to make sure he has cover under and over on him. I'm not going to say TO ability is the same as it was 5 or 6 years ago but it is still to the point where he has to be accounted for ask those coaches who choose to man up on him this past season.

Those who played tight man coverage and jammed him at the line of scrimmage had a lot of success. I guess the revelation after Shawn Springs kept him underwraps was forgotten. He had the same issues against Rod Hood. He destroyed the 49ers because they inexplicably played off of him and gave him a cushion. Coach Johnson is right. He can be controlled now. He is not terrible, but he is no longer elite. That is where the tradeoff has to be evaluated. If he is no longer elite, what is the allure?
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Alexander;2579884 said:
Those who played tight man coverage and jammed him at the line of scrimmage had a lot of success. I guess the revelation after Shawn Springs kept him underwraps was forgotten. He had the same issues against Rod Hood. He destroyed the 49ers because they inexplicably played off of him and gave him a cushion. Coach Johnson is right. He can be controlled now. He is not terrible, but he is no longer elite. That is where the tradeoff has to be evaluated. If he is no longer elite, what is the allure?

Those teams who jammed him had coverage over the top which is why they could get as physical as they did. As I said I don't think he is the same player he once was but I can promise you one on one even in bump coverage he is going to win that battle unless you can bring help over the top.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
Yeagermeister;2579876 said:
Or if he's cut or traded they will be saying it was a mistake just like they did with Fasano.

Thats because it will be a mistake.
 

remdak

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,613
Reaction score
5,251
khiladi;2579836 said:
So Jimmy Johnson has pretty much implied that he would take a locker-room cancer, if he was a 'great' player....
Yes, he has admitted that in the past. Someone once asked him about Lawrence Tayor sleeping in NYG meetings. Johnson said that if it were a backup player, he would cut him. If it was Emmitt Smith, he would ask Emmitt if he needed a pillow or anything else to make him more comfortable.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
remdak;2579918 said:
Yes, he has admitted that in the past. Someone once asked him about Lawrence Tayor sleeping in NYG meetings. Johnson said that if it were a backup player, he would cut him. If it was Emmitt Smith, he would ask Emmitt if he needed a pillow or anything else to make him more comfortable.

True, it was not hard for Jimmy to cut Curvin Richards
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Doomsday101;2579891 said:
Those teams who jammed him had coverage over the top which is why they could get as physical as they did. As I said I don't think he is the same player he once was but I can promise you one on one even in bump coverage he is going to win that battle unless you can bring help over the top.

This is right. As long as he demands attention from a safety, he's a hard player to replace.

I don't recall, but wasn't Jimmy Johnson a fan of the move when we brought TO in? It'd be interesting if he opinion changed after this year.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
Idgit;2579932 said:
This is right. As long as he demands attention from a safety, he's a hard player to replace.

I don't recall, but wasn't Jimmy Johnson a fan of the move when we brought TO in? It'd be interesting if he opinion changed after this year.

The one game that they didnt gameplan specifically for TO with bump and run and safety help he went off for over 200 yards.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Idgit;2579932 said:
This is right. As long as he demands attention from a safety, he's a hard player to replace.

I don't recall, but wasn't Jimmy Johnson a fan of the move when we brought TO in? It'd be interesting if he opinion changed after this year.

I don't recall Jimmy being a fan of it or not. I know I was not very thrilled with TO signing but at least in my view he has not been as bad as I have seen in the past from him. Yes he lets his emotions at times get the better of him and he does not know when to let issues with the media go. As for his ability to play the game he is still a player who teams must pay attention to if not he will hurt you badly.

In all honesty I don't know what the real situation is in Dallas between Romo and TO or TO and Garrett I know what is being rumored about how much truth is there I have no real clue and I don't think most others know either pro or con.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Doomsday101;2579891 said:
Those teams who jammed him had coverage over the top which is why they could get as physical as they did. As I said I don't think he is the same player he once was but I can promise you one on one even in bump coverage he is going to win that battle unless you can bring help over the top.

Having the "help up top" is meaningless if the corner cannot hold Owens up. Springs and Rod Hood had no issues with it schematically and Owens was not a factor. The only time is as you describe is when they play zero coverage, which is the cornerbacks left alone in man press coverage. Owens never has been an expert at beating the press and can be negated if he is running deep routes against it. That is one reason why he was complaining about the scheme to begin with. There were too many deep routes (sideline especially) that took too long to develop. If he did not beat the press, he was frustrated for games at a time.

He simply is not quick enough and sharp enough on his routes to get under the closing safety any more. If he is allowed to build up a head of steam, his speed is deep speed. He is not sudden. Nor does he come off the line with as much explosion as he once did.

He's going to "win battles" when there is no battle. Clements played off of him and he ate that coverage up all day long. He did the same thing when Johnson had Lito Sheppard play zero coverage on him.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
NextGenBoys;2579943 said:
The one game that they didnt gameplan specifically for TO with bump and run and safety help he went off for over 200 yards.

That's the thing. The ENTIRE offense trended downwards, even ultra-security blanket Jason Witten. The entire offense slumped, not just one player.

Saying one player is responsible or was worse than most is ridiculous.
 

Venger

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,661
Reaction score
788
Who is the best receiver on this team?

Here endeth the lesson.
 
Top