Parche
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,028
- Reaction score
- 101
Night and day difference between Church and Wilcox out there.
And which differences do you find? Who do you prefer?
I mean, Im glad we have both on our team.
Night and day difference between Church and Wilcox out there.
This dude has received a ton of criticism (mostly justified) for his play.
But I'm not sure he gets enough credit for how well he has performed this year.
Sure, he still takes bad angles once in a while. And he will drop a potential INT.
But he is such an enforcer back there! Guys are looking over their shoulder, scared of the lumber that JJ is about to lay... and I love it! There's a visible difference in our play when he's in the game.
So, whatever the difference is, props to JJ Wilcox for the improvements he's made this season. It's fun to see.
I actually like Wilcox. I've been patient with him. The guy hasn't been a defender for very long. People forget that. I think he could be a part of a very good defense. I don't think you have to replace him to accomplish that.
Gotta give some props to the new DB coach.....Wilcox, Heath, Jones, Brown etc.........have all progressed to solid contributor status.
Hes turned into such a big time hitter
Greg Jackson deserves every penny they are paying him. Eberflus is also worth his weight as the coverage coordinator.
They aren't perfect but guys help each other out and pass off in zone coverage. We have maintained our man skills. There is a more physical element to their tackling, and probably most impressive is that guys are filling in without a drop in the level of play. Scandrick, Mo, Brown, Wilcox, and Church have all missed games. Jones is the straw that stirs the proverbial drink with his ability to play all 5 spots. Heath and Brown have filled in admirably.
We've struggled to develop back 7 in year's past but heck now you keep giving these guys players and you could well see something special.
Wilcox and church were laughing stocks to fans now they are getting respect. Good for them and good for the coaches for sticking with them.
I said it in the game thread…I'd sign Wilcox over Church.
This dude has received a ton of criticism (mostly justified) for his play.
But I'm not sure he gets enough credit for how well he has performed this year.
Sure, he still takes bad angles once in a while. And he will drop a potential INT.
But he is such an enforcer back there! Guys are looking over their shoulder, scared of the lumber that JJ is about to lay... and I love it! There's a visible difference in our play when he's in the game.
So, whatever the difference is, props to JJ Wilcox for the improvements he's made this season. It's fun to see.
He was never the terrible player people said he was.
I actually like Wilcox. I've been patient with him. The guy hasn't been a defender for very long. People forget that. I think he could be a part of a very good defense. I don't think you have to replace him to accomplish that.
This dude has received a ton of criticism (mostly justified) for his play.
But I'm not sure he gets enough credit for how well he has performed this year.
Sure, he still takes bad angles once in a while. And he will drop a potential INT.
But he is such an enforcer back there! Guys are looking over their shoulder, scared of the lumber that JJ is about to lay... and I love it! There's a visible difference in our play when he's in the game.
So, whatever the difference is, props to JJ Wilcox for the improvements he's made this season. It's fun to see.
Helps when you got Byron Jones out there. Church and Wilcox aren't asked to cover tightends as much. They can seek and destroy.
Church's one strength throughout the years was his sure tackling. That's gone now. Wilcox isn't exactly a precision tackler, but he's an enforcer. He covers more ground than Church in the passing game, as well.And which differences do you find? Who do you prefer?
I mean, Im glad we have both on our team.
I wouldn't. They are doing just fine.I'd take a high draft pick over both.