JJT on NFLN: Cowboys are 8-8 Team... vid post #39

[Bob Sacamano]

http://img14.*************/img14/2914/45245378.png

 

[Rampage]

 

[khiladi]

http://img14.*************/img14/2914/45245378.png

"I know I suck as a QB, but even I can tell this guy is ********."

 

[Rampage]

 

[Bob Sacamano]

http://img16.*************/img16/5736/24237285.png

 

[Fletch]

I hope we go "under the radar" Because the spotlight is obviously not working.

Spot on. The Cowboys did not handle last year's Super Bowl prediction and the pressure that goes along with it. The season was lost before it really even got started. Not to mention the locker room B.S. that was supposedly going on as well.

Hopefully the house cleaning that went on earlier this offseason will correct a lot of things. I don't see the Cowboys as an 8-8 team. I feel the Cowboys have actually improved by ridding themselves of players like Pacman, Tank, Roy "Biscuit" Williams, and especially T.O.

 

[DallasEast]

In my case, I simply don't want to name names.

Copout. You could refrain from making weak accusations which you, yourself, aren't willing to back up, but that's not the khiladi way, is it?

 

[DallasEast]

Don't act like I haven't explained it to you many times before. There is absolutely nothing to indicate this offense will be outstanding next year, as far as it concerns Garrett's coaching. Absolutely nothing, but false dreams and nostalgia of the 90s. The guy is lucky he has an all-star cast around him and if he performs anywhere near average, let alone above average or outstanding, he will win a couple of games.

If he does it, great. But don't act like there is something to indicate he's done something worthy to give him some consideration that the offense will perform 'outstanding'.

:laugh2: at this logic:

"If Garrett's the offensive coordinator, there is zero chance for the offense to be successful in '09, BUT it could happen".

Brilliant!

 

[khiladi]

Copout. You could refrain from making weak accusations which you, yourself, aren't willing to back up, but that's not the khiladi way, is it?

Like I said, learn to understand basic definitions of the very words you try and call somebody out on. Just because I didn't back them up in the way YOU wanted doesn't mean I copped-out. I know it may irritate you, but that is just the reality of the matter.

 

[Rampage]

 

[khiladi]

:laugh2: at this logic:

"If Garrett's the offensive coordinator, there is zero chance for the offense to be successful in '09, BUT it could happen".


Brilliant!

Poor baby.. Now your upset that I called you out your lack of understanding basic definitions of words that you employed, so you gotta blatantly mis-quote me to try and win an argument.Is that all you really have to go on. Even I can make exxagerated statements with an exclamation point that are not accompanied by a real argument, but then again, I don't prefer to look stupid.If your going to mis-quote me, I suggest you actually not quote my original post in the thread. Where did I say 'zero chance for the offense to be successful'? Let me re-quote it for you one more time so you may gladly point out to me where I said such a thing... "There is absolutely nothing to indicate this offense will be outstanding next year, as far as it concerns Garrett's coaching."