JJT on NFLN: Cowboys are 8-8 Team... vid post #39

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,330
Reaction score
64,027
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
khiladi;2728159 said:
Love the hypocrisy on this board of people complaining about how Cowboy fans are rooting for Romo and Witten to fail. How quick they forget they are the same people who were pretty much rooting for the Cowboys to fail with TO? Now their whining when their getting a taste of their own medicine. For 3 years they have been whining. Or how about the Parcells-love fest. "We told you when Jones got rid of Parcells, the crap would hit the fan."
Pray tell, do you have any names which fit that accusation?
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
khiladi;2728171 said:
"Maybe with Wade becoming full time defensive coordinator then we might see a consistent defensive performance that will allow Romo to become 'efficient'. Of course, that also begs the question as to who is correcting the penalty problems and the overall rampant sloppy play of the entire 53 man roster with a full time defensive coordinator playing glorified part time head coach."Let's also ignore the fact that Dallas was the most penalized teams with Bill Parcells as head coach. Oh yeah, forgot about that.


If the Cowboys lead the NFL in penalties under Parcells or if people were rooting for the Cowboys to fail with TO, you would almost half way sorta have a point.

As it stands, you look as cuckoo for cocoa puffs as your hero. I hope there arent any bottles of vicadin around to emulate any 'accidents'.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,847
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
DallasEast;2728307 said:
Pray tell, do you have any names which fit that accusation?


He gets nuttier everday! The guy needs therapy!

I was a big T.O. fan until last year when he decided to open his iMouth.

I have never read anyone on the board that was hoping for the Boyz to lose because of T.O!

How stupid is that?


:confused:
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
khiladi;2728159 said:
Love the hypocrisy on this board of people complaining about how Cowboy fans are rooting for Romo and Witten to fail. How quick they forget they are the same people who were pretty much rooting for the Cowboys to fail with TO? Now their whining when their getting a taste of their own medicine. For 3 years they have been whining. Or how about the Parcells-love fest. "We told you when Jones got rid of Parcells, the crap would hit the fan."

Bye golly. I think you got it. The same peeps swore up and down Dan Reeves feel through because of TO.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
Doomsday101;2728212 said:
In your opinion excuses me if I don't look at you as an expert in the ways of offense you have an opinion that is all nothing more than that. You don't know what plays are being called nor do you know if the play was even ran as it should have been. There are normally more than 1 option on any given pass play and how the defense aligns has a heck of a lot to do with where the QB intends on going with the ball. This team did not go to the playoffs for many reason and I'll include Garrett but Garrett nor the offense gave up back to back 90 some odd yard runs to the Ravens now did they? yet put up points on that same Ravens defense even in the clutch to regain the lead only to see it slip away by the play of the defense but then you are so narrow sighted that you don't see that because if does not fit with your ragging on Garrett.

I don't give a rat's butt if you say you don't look at me as an expert. The fact is, you sure make it a point to try and respond to my alleged 'whining; at every oppurtunity you get. It is quite obvious by your actions you care what I say.

The fact is, you read my post wrong and you can't admit it you made a mistake. You went on this irrelevant tangent.

And further, Garrett had everything to do with the two Raven's run, because it was his pathetic play-calling that kept the defense on the field for that long. And further, Garrett had very little to do with the offense actually scoring. It is called the talent of the Cowboys offense overcoming the ineptitude of Garrett when they were in hurry-up. The fact is, when the impact of Garrett was felt in the game, during quarters 2 and 3, they were producing 3 and outs 5 times accompanied by 2 4 and outs.

Garrett is a joke. That is just the reality of it. He was the number one reason this team failed and was inept. When he took control of the whole offense, it flat-out sputtered. He couldn't handle more than the passing game, and when that passing game was figured out and shut-down, Romo ended up on his back all the time because of a shoddy blocking game, despite the fact he is among the best at keeping plays alive with his feet. Hell, Garrett had Houck, and even Houck couldn't overcome the inpetitude of Garrett's play-calling. He looked like one of the worst OL coaches in the league, despite his HoF career.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
InmanRoshi;2728326 said:
If the Cowboys lead the NFL in penalties under Parcells or if people were rooting for the Cowboys to fail with TO, you would almost half way sorta have a point.

As it stands, you look as cuckoo for cocoa puffs as your hero. I hope there arent any bottles of vicadin around to emulate any 'accidents'.

Your seriously not going to deny the fact that the Cowboys were among the league leaders in penalties under Parcells? What is further laughable is you making the accusation that people are rooting for the Cowboys to fail with Romo and Witten, and somehow denying the case when it came to TO.

Keep coming up stupid comments about 'vicodin' and the constant repetition of TO tried to commit suicide routine brcause they clearly demonstrate you were waiting for TO to fail, which ultimately meant the Cowboys failing. Your agenda is obvious. It's been obvious since your boy Parcells leaving too. Wade is the puppet figure head, who is just a glorified DC, unlike the great Parcells. I bet you were one of those that said the Cowboys went 13-3 because of Parcells.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
DallasEast;2728307 said:
Pray tell, do you have any names which fit that accusation?

Just read the thread and the people who are bringing this whole argument about people rooting for Romo and Witten to fail.. It doesn't take a genius to see it. The funny thing is, you people act like it's not obvious and play the whole ignorant game.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
big dog cowboy;2728640 said:
Then how do you explain the success of 2007?

He cant.

Hopefully when the offense is outstanding this yr, he'll just go away like a few of the other boneheads we've had here.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,330
Reaction score
64,027
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
khiladi;2728612 said:
Just read the thread and the people who are bringing this whole argument about people rooting for Romo and Witten to fail.. It doesn't take a genius to see it. The funny thing is, you people act like it's not obvious and play the whole ignorant game.
copout noun

1 : the act or an instance of copping out
2 : an excuse or means for copping out : pretext
3 : a person who cops out

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/copout
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
big dog cowboy;2728640 said:
Then how do you explain the success of 2007?

How do you explain the fact he couldn't get a single head-coaching job in 2008, when he was the hottest commodity in 2007? What really is your point?

I've explained it many times, ad nauseum. It is called 'being figured out', like Buddy Ryan was with the 4-6 defense. The West Coast offense put an end to that offense. The 4-6 is no longer used as a base defense and Ryan can't sniff a job in the league anymore. For Garrett, it happened at the end of the year in 2007. Even TO said this was the case meaning he recognized that Jason Garrett was pretty good in 2007, at least as far as it concerned the passing game. When TO went down last year, it effectively ended the Garrett era of success. Teams realized that without TO, the Dallas offense would stall. They started to man-up on him with safety help over the top.

The Dallas offense couldn't move the chains against the Commanders to even earn Romo some statistical records without TO. The pathetic thing is, Garrett couldn't get decent yardage.

2008 also included Jason Garrett gaining more responsibility, including the handling the running game. Not only did the average running game of 2007 suffer more, the pass protection schemes looked like garbage. The OL could no longer block basic delayed blitzes. There is a reason Tony Romo started to get killed more so last season than any season before. The more responsibility Garrett took on, the more he showed his inability to see the whole picture. He couldn't devise a short-passing game to keep the pressure off of Romo. He couldn't even adjust, when everybody was telling him to run the ball.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
dbair1967;2728642 said:
He cant.

Hopefully when the offense is outstanding this yr, he'll just go away like a few of the other boneheads we've had here.

Don't act like I haven't explained it to you many times before. There is absolutely nothing to indicate this offense will be outstanding next year, as far as it concerns Garrett's coaching. Absolutely nothing, but false dreams and nostalgia of the 90s. The guy is lucky he has an all-star cast around him and if he performs anywhere near average, let alone above average or outstanding, he will win a couple of games.

If he does it, great. But don't act like there is something to indicate he's done something worthy to give him some consideration that the offense will perform 'outstanding'.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
JasonGarrett.jpg
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
DallasEast;2728732 said:
copout noun

1 : the act or an instance of copping out
2 : an excuse or means for copping out : pretext
3 : a person who cops out

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/copout

Really, your quote isn't amusing and the only thing your demonstrating is your inability to understand what 'copping-out' is. Just because I refuse to enter into a little grudge match with you, doesn't mean I'm copping out. The condition of Copping-out would be more adequately realized if I actually said I would provide you with names, and later on refuse to. In my case, I simply don't want to name names.

The fact is, I explained mself quite clearly to demonstrate my point. If you want to know names, then read the thread liek I told you to. If your not going to meet my demands, then why should I meet yours? According to your world, your just as much a cop-out as me.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
We'll probably be seeing more of this, and you won't be laughing:

http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/********/2008/12/p1_garrett2.jpghttp://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/********/2008/12/p1_garrett2.jpg
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
The funny thing is, you think it bothers me, yet, your the one, like many others, following me around, sniffing my jock.
 
Top