joseephuss
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,041
- Reaction score
- 6,920
"I told ya so.." isn't using any kind of logic to form an opinion on the article.. and honestly, i shouldn't even have said it.
Yes, I already said you didn't use logic when you started this thread.
I do hope some people read the article and come away realizing that there was no evidence to show that Paterno was involved in any kind of attempt to cover up the information he had been given.
..and the article most certainly dealt in fact. Whether you chose to believe it or not is your opinion, but this was the former deputy AG, who had access to all the information and evidence gathered for the entire case.. and said that in all the evidence there was zero that implicated Paterno in the cover up with the other three men.
That is a fact.. again, what you chose to believe is up to you.
That is not a fact. That is this guys opinion. It was Freeh's opinion that Paterno was somewhat culpable based on the evidence he viewed, which isn't a fact, either.