The officers had every reason to speak to Brent, and they even had a reason to think he had some mental health issues that would have required him to be taken to a mental health facility for his own safety. The problem arises when they come up with the bs about the smelling of alcohol. You dont smell alcohol when there is none present.And you said it right, the "CASE," was for probation violation, but since he tested negative for any drugs in his system, there was no case. Someone who has some mental health issues will NEVER be held accountable for resisting arrest or obstructing... so there was no case. I could also say IF Brent had shot and killed someone, charges would have been filed. Well no kidding.... but the fact is, he wasnt intoxicated, so no kidding the charges were dropped.
Like I said, I can understand why officers were called , and the original call to police even stated they thought the individual might need HELP, so having that information should have had officers arriving on scene already thinking this guy might have some issues.... not the kind of issues that demanded he be treated like a criminal and then charged with all sorts of crap.... again, ESPECIALLY the bs about "Smelling," alcohol on him. So in the end, yes, the DA dropeed this because it was exactly what I said..... garbage.
Lastly, the body cam footage is so edited out that it is impossible for us to really discuss it. I would have had zero problems with the police in this situation had he been treated a s aperson with a medical issue... he wasnt. I also had zero problem with tasing him and putting him in cuffs since that was fro the safety of all involved.