Joyner - The case for drafting Bridgewater....

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,420
Reaction score
212,335
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Metrics, game tape reveal that the Louisville QB is worth the hype

The risk/reward involved in investing a first-round pick in a quarterback is tremendous. Two years ago, famed NFL general manager Ernie Accorsi told ESPN's Colin Cowherd that no price is too high to pay if the quarterback turns out to be great, but, if he turned out to be a bust, the move could set a franchise back five to seven years.

Although none of the quarterbacks in this year's class is considered a can't-miss prospect, it seems this type of home run or strikeout dichotomy is making teams think twice about selecting Louisville Cardinals quarterback Teddy Bridgewater, in particular, with one of the first choices in the 2014 NFL draft.

The puzzling part about this trepidation is there are an overwhelming number of factors pointing toward Bridgewater being as close to a sure thing QB prospect as can be found in any year's draft -- and, if he does slide, he could end up being a steal for the team that takes him.

Let's take a look at the case for using a first-round pick on Bridgewater.


The Parcells rules

In his long tenure as a successful talent evaluator, Hall of Fame coach Bill Parcells came up with a list of seven criteria he used when drafting quarterbacks.

1. Be a three-year starter
2. Be a senior in college
3. Graduate from college
4. Start 30 games
5. Win 23 games
6. Post a 2-1 touchdown-to-interception ratio
7. Tally a completion rate of 60 percent or higher

Different eras of passing can lead to reasonable questions about how the rules are applied, but the idea behind them is important: It should help you find a durable, accurate and self-motivated passer who can hit big plays while avoiding mistakes and who will finish what he starts.

It is extremely difficult to find first-round-caliber quarterbacks who meet all seven rules. In the BCS era (which encompasses the 1999 through 2013 NFL drafts), only nine players can make the claim to have done this (listed alphabetically): Drew Brees, Robert Griffin III, Byron Leftwich, Matt Leinart, Andrew Luck, Eli Manning, Chad Pennington, Philip Rivers and Tim Tebow.


More: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draf...014-nfl-draft-case-drafting-teddy-bridgewater


Bottom line

There is no guarantee Bridgewater will become an elite NFL passer, and factors such as his lean frame and subpar pro-day workout appear to be causing some significant reservations for teams considering drafting him. But this is a player who rates out very well in two of the most critical factors to quarterback success -- decision-making and performance under pressure -- and who possesses the experience and intangibles to succeed at the next level. History shows players of this caliber are very rare, and that scarcity should make Bridgewater one of the top picks in the 2014 NFL draft. If he slides down the board at all, he could develop into one of this year's draft steals.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
I'd love to get Bridgewater in this draft.

I think fans and 'experts' are getting caught up in the old 'paralysis by analysis' thing. When the season ended, Bridgewater was surefire top 5 pick.

Competitive, talented, smart and reliable. Exact qualities you want in charge of your offense.

His frame is concerning, obviously, but everything else is worth the risk.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Phil Simms made a big deal about him yesterday on Sirius, basically calling him overrated and a product of hype. Even pointed out that the gloves he wore during games hide his deficiencies and that was proven at his Pro Day.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,997
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Phil Simms made a big deal about him yesterday on Sirius, basically calling him overrated and a product of hype. Even pointed out that the gloves he wore during games hide his deficiencies and that was proven at his Pro Day.

If a QB is used to wearing gloves, and he can wear them in the NFL, I have to wonder why he would not wear them at his pro day.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
If a QB is used to wearing gloves, and he can wear them in the NFL, I have to wonder why he would not wear them at his pro day.

He was probably asked to perform without them or was given some bad advise by a handler.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,997
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
He was probably asked to perform without them or was given some bad advise by a handler.

I am sure he was asked to do it without the gloves...but that still leads to the question of Why.

I can understand someone wanting to change a QBs release point or their delivery and other areas of improvement...but wearing gloves or not seems a little silly IMO.

If wearing gloves makes a QB comfortable...do it.

I think it is worse trying to all of a sudden change something like that.

It does not mean anything to me in the grand scheme of things...just find it odd.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
I am sure he was asked to do it without the gloves...but that still leads to the question of Why.

I can understand someone wanting to change a QBs release point or their delivery and other areas of improvement...but wearing gloves or not seems a little silly IMO.

If wearing gloves makes a QB comfortable...do it.

I think it is worse trying to all of a sudden change something like that.

It does not mean anything to me in the grand scheme of things...just find it odd.

By and large, many NFL execs are traditionalists. Even when Roethlisberger kept wearing the glove in warm weather it was questioned.

Simms' observation was that the glove allows Bridgewater to grip the ball better and put more spin on it. It was an interesting observation that nobody else has made.
 

manster4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,021
Reaction score
3,378
man, he just doesn't pass the eye test for me. (NOT talking about his pro day as I couldn't care less about it) I'm talking about on tape. I saw a few of his games this year. Failed to impress me in many areas. PASS. (pun intended)
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,942
Reaction score
8,681
I am sure he was asked to do it without the gloves...but that still leads to the question of Why.

I can understand someone wanting to change a QBs release point or their delivery and other areas of improvement...but wearing gloves or not seems a little silly IMO.

If wearing gloves makes a QB comfortable...do it.

I think it is worse trying to all of a sudden change something like that.

It does not mean anything to me in the grand scheme of things...just find it odd.

He didn't give specifics but on "Gruden's QB Camp" (or whatever that segment on espn is called) he said not wearing the gloves to his pro day was a huge mistake. So he either was trying to prove something and failed miserably or got some really bad advice.

But you're absolutely right, it would only be a serious concern if he was allowed to wear gloves in the nfl. If he throws the ball really well with gloves then who the heck cares? I remember Kurt Warner struggling without the gloves towards the end of his career
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Over analysis, gentlemen. This kid is a good football player.

Not saying he isn't. I like most of the top rated QBs. What you are seeing now with the extra two weeks is a lot more overanalysis and it is going to get worse the more of spectacle is made of the draft.

I can honestly say I have never seen players picked apart more over the most miniscule things before.
 

KB1122

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,328
Reaction score
1,629
I would say that analysis paralysis has seeped in on a number of high-profile players, not just the quarterbacks. Too many people looking for flaws and reasons not to draft.
 

Western

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,065
Reaction score
2,654
Based on the importance of the QB position and the relative short-term need for a QB, if either Manziel or Bridgewater are available at 16, Dallas would be wise to select the QB.

At 16th selection, the belief that there would be a defensive player or offensive lineman ranked higher than Manziel or Bridgewater is an illusion.

This is the time of the year when rumors, misleading stories, & intentional false analysis of prospective players are flooded to the media.

Stick to your draft board, listen to your scouts, and focus on need ~ and ignore the 'talking heads'.
 

ColeBeasley11

BruceCarter54
Messages
490
Reaction score
355
I watched a lot of his games last season. He was ridiculously accurate and unflappable in the clutch. Not sure why people are knocking him honestly.

Ya couldn't agree more, if Houston takes Bortles their gonna regret it imo
 

ceerrece

Active Member
Messages
416
Reaction score
173
If Bridgewater falls to 16th, you gotta take him regardless of the draft needs of this team. The possibility that Dallas ends next season with a mediocre record(let's say 8-8) is real considering the losses on defense, needs on various positions, etc., so there is not certainty that we can land a top prospect QB in the 2015 draft(not a top 5 pick), so if a projected top 5 prospect falls to you this year, you should consider real hard to draft him. Saying all this, i don't think Jerry does it.
 

SilverStarCowboy

The Actualist
Messages
10,337
Reaction score
1,998
@ 16 you step up and grab him for the future.....but again YOU DON'T REBUILD WITH ROMO and that's straight outta the horses mouth.
 

manster4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,021
Reaction score
3,378
Meh, I didn't like Matt Ryan that much coming out either. He's been VERY good early on and lately not so good. Who knows? To say it's an inexact science would be an understatement:

Dan McGwire
Andre Ware
Joey Harrington
Akili Smith
Heath Shuler
Tim Rosenboom
David Carr
Ryan Leaf
Jamarcus Russell
Todd Marinovich
.........probably a few others I can't think of right now. All those guys were selected by GM's and their scouts that are paid millions not to miss, and they did. Bridgewater? I haven't been bowled over as his accuracy isn't that impressive, but he could be good like a few of you seem to think. Time will tell. ( I will say this...he's a GOOD kid that's worked hard to get where he's at. I know his personal story and it's a good one. That said, he has some work to do to become elite IMO. Won't mind one bit if I'm wrong.)
 
Top