Hostile;1081828 said:
Concerned wouldn't be the right word, shocked might be.
I'd be shocked if he were the next Tom Brady, too. I don't see that happening.
Becoming a Jake Delhomme is probably the best case scenerio for Romo.
Could Romo be a John Kitna or Charlie Frye? I think so. And those using the busdriver model of QB could see Frye and/or Kitna as "serviceable" or "good enough."
Hostile;1081828 said:
I know my elitest attitude about QBs rubs some the wrong way. I just don't see what the harm is in being honest about stuff.
No harm at all in being forthright.
Hostile;1081828 said:
So I got to ask a question in return. Is it a bad thing if Tony Romo never is more than a backup here? See, I don't think so, and that's where a lot of people get lost in my rants. See, while I appreciate the 128 or fewer exculsive club I'm still always looking for an even more exclusive club, a top 10 QB.
There is no shame in being a backup.
But some coaches have seen Romo as a potential starter (e.g., Payton wanted Romo to start over Quincy Carter). If Romo remains a backup, it would mean that Romo didn't develop into the player that some coaches thought he might become. That would be less than ideal - particularly for a team that current could use a better starting QB.
Would it be horrible or awful or the end of the world? No. Spending a top 1st round draft pick on Ryan Leaf or Joey Herrington or Heath Shuler (etc.) would be pretty awful, but it isn't like the Cowboys had to sell the farm to obtain Romo. He came very cheap (a telephone call).
Hostile;1081828 said:
Because of this philosophy of mine I'm not subject to over the top optimism and Pollyanna stories. Might Romo turn out to be a good QB? Sure he can. I hope he will, perhaps more than anyone even understands. That doesn't mean I have to expect it to happen. I prefer to be honest. That's as simple as I can say it. The odds of him being the 2nd coming of Tom Brady are slight at best.
Tom Brady, sure. Chances aren't particularly good that any QB, even those selected with the top draft choices, will be that good.
But Delhomme, Frye, Kitna? I don't see that as so terribly unlikely.
I'd guess that you wouldn't be satisfied with a Charlie Frye level / kind of QB, though. Is that right?
Hostile;1081828 said:
My complaint with our current situation is that Parcells seems immovable about the position. Year one, he thought he could coach our QBs to better results.
He was right, I think. The Cowboys surprised all by getting into the playoffs that year.
Hostile;1081828 said:
Year two, he thought his past dinosaur was a great idea.
Oh, not really. Testaverde was signed before Quincy Carter imploded. Testaverde was to serve as Carter's mentor. Then *poof* Carter was gone. Parcells' choice was between the overripe and not-ready.
Hostile;1081828 said:
year 3 and 4 a younger retread of his past. Throughout all of this almost no effort to actually develop the young QBs. That bothers me.
Year 3 was as you say.
Year 4 isn't over yet. And, actually, I'm hoping that Romo starts over Bledsoe.
I guess I'm a little surprised that you aren't too, given your appraisal of Bledsoe (a retread) and Parcells (no effort to develop the young QBs).
Hostile;1081828 said:
None at all. Absolutely not even 1%. If he were to play great I'd be as thrilled as anyone. The difference with me is I'm very skeptical about the odds he can do that.
I understand.
Hostile;1081828 said:
I gave up believing in Faery Tales a long time ago, but I still root for the underdogs. That's why I like Romo but don't necessarily believe as the masses do that he's our answer as a starter.
I think it is unrealistic to
expect Fairy Tales to happen, and incorrect to assume that they don't ever happen - given the unlikely stories of Brady, Delhomme, Warner, and many others down through the years (e.g., John Unitas was a 9th round pick).
I don't expect Romo to be a great success, but I do think there is a decent chance that Romo can exceed the low bar that Bledsoe has set over the past 14 games or so. It isn't like Romo has to play like Tom Brady to be a net improvement over Bledsoe. All things considered, Charlie Frye would be an improvement.