Cowboyny
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,427
- Reaction score
- 22,736
I wanted to see how our draft would look like in a QB trade down scenario. Pro Football simulation was used and Farley was taken ahead of us:
We trade pick 10 (1) and 115 (4) to Indy for 21 (1), 54 (2), 84 (3)
So we move back to 21 and get an extra 2 and a 3, but lose our first 4th rd pick.
21-Ojulari DE/OLB (could play DE or strong-side OLB, best pass rusher in the class in my opinion)
44-McNeil NT (both Moehrig/Grant off the board, filled one of our biggest needs with the best option)
54-Nixon DT (was able to double up at the position with a legit high level 3T)
75-Tufele DT (surprised he lasted here, could play many positions along the DL)
84-Newsome II CB (excellent fit in the Cover 3 as a zone Corner with size/length)
99-Washington FS (excellent get at this spot, top 3 as a single high in this class)
138-Deablo SS/LB (went with the hybrid as the value wasn't great at LB or T)
We trade pick 10 (1) and 115 (4) to Indy for 21 (1), 54 (2), 84 (3)
So we move back to 21 and get an extra 2 and a 3, but lose our first 4th rd pick.
21-Ojulari DE/OLB (could play DE or strong-side OLB, best pass rusher in the class in my opinion)
44-McNeil NT (both Moehrig/Grant off the board, filled one of our biggest needs with the best option)
54-Nixon DT (was able to double up at the position with a legit high level 3T)
75-Tufele DT (surprised he lasted here, could play many positions along the DL)
84-Newsome II CB (excellent fit in the Cover 3 as a zone Corner with size/length)
99-Washington FS (excellent get at this spot, top 3 as a single high in this class)
138-Deablo SS/LB (went with the hybrid as the value wasn't great at LB or T)