TellerMorrow34
BraveHeartFan
- Messages
- 28,358
- Reaction score
- 5,077
ninja;3287581 said:Yeah, only idiots have backup plans.![]()
I mean, a player getting injured in the NFL. Think it may happen on rare occasion?
I guess we'll just cross that bridge when we get there nonsense is better than actually having a plan in place.
And if he gets injured, oh well, there is always the practice squad players and UPS workers.
I'm pretty sure you don't find any NFL teams drafting players, who are not a need for their team, based on the idea "Oh well what if so and so gets hurt."
DT is not our biggest need. We have FAR greater needs than DT. If it was a need and we drafted for depth, awesome. No issue.
Kind of like how we did with the corner situation a couple of years ago. It was a weakness, with no depth, so we picked up a FA and drafted 2 other CBs. Depth solved.
But now with the depth we have at the position if we spent our first 2 picks in the draft on corners because "Gosh darn it Jenkins might get hurt this year" then it would be incredibly stupid.
Wasting a 1st or 2nd round pick on a player at a position that we are not in need of, over positions where there is greater need, is not a sound strategy, IMO.
I know some will say "Well what if he's the BPA there and nothing at the positions you need more is worth taking there" well then to me you trade down and pick up extra selections rather than simply taking a luxury player for the sake of doing so.
SLATEmosphere;3287610 said:I really don't get the Cody hate. The guy is a beast and would really add solid depth at NT.
We wouldn't lose much with Cody in for Ratliff.
Plus if Ratliff goes down we're pretty much ****ed. With Cody, the pass rush goes down but the run D wouldn't lose a beat. It actually would be better.
If D-Ware goes down we're pretty much ****ed. Should we trade up and try and make sure we get the best pass rushing OLB in the draft just in case?
If Tony Romo goes down we're screwed 8 million times over so should we reach and get a QB just in case?
You could play that "if he goes down" game all day long and it wouldn't make it a sound drafting strategy.
SLATEmosphere;3287612 said:Exactly. Give Cody 15 snaps a game. Allowing Rat to stay fresh.
Not really sure on how that is an awful pick. It's actually a smart one.
Terrible idea. It would be fine for his first year to get him around 15-20 snaps a game. But what after that?
See that's the other thing here with the backup role he'll be. Some of these other positions that are of greater need will be backups initially too, but they'll be fighting for starting positions at some point. The safeties and OL guys will possibly start out as a back up but they're going to eventually be the starter would be the idea with them at those picks.
Will Cody, outside of an injury to Rat ever be the starter here? No. Absolutely not. He's not ever going to beat Jay out for that NT spot so you're telling me you think it's a great idea to spend a 2nd rounder on a guy who will be a career backup here so you can use him for 15 snaps a game?
That would be a terrible investment of a second round pick.
ninja;3287751 said:aka Realists.
aka Those with a plan.
aka Sensible.
Sorry. Just because you hate him, doesn't make it a bad pick.
And surely you know that Wade is against starting rookies. So, all the draft picks are going to be backups their rookie year.
Maybe, you and your all-knowing crystal ball know that Cody is a career backup.
He's a career backup at NT in Dallas. Now if you'd like to spend a 2nd on him so he can play 4 years behind Ratliff and then go somewhere else then by all means you can do that. It's a terrible idea but, hey, whatever you addressed the what if Jay gets injured situation.
Like I mentioned above they're all likely going to start out as backups when the 2010 season starts but at positions of greater need like Safety and O-Line those guys would be given every chance in the world to become the starters by 2011. Mt. Cody is never going to start in Dallas unless Rat winds up hurt or we decided to just get rid of Rat just so Mt. Cody could be here.
Bob Sacamano;3287898 said:Ask yourselve's this. Would you take Albert Haynesworth at a fraction of the cost?
If your answer is yes, then you say yes to drafting Terrence Cody.
Depends on how much of the cost you're taking away. I'm not paying Albert starter money to only play in 50-60% of the teams defensive snaps cause he's too fat and out of shape to play any more than that.
Cody looks to be in even worse shape meaning that the idea of him even playing 50% of the snaps seems overly generous to me.
Hostile;3288150 said:Okay wait. What does Duke Robinson have to do with Terrence Cody?
Prior to Cody removing his shirt most Draft publications had him as a 1st round pick. Now he is listed as either 1-2 tweener, or even a couple have him as a 2-3 tweener.
If he drops to the 4th or 5th round will that mean the same thing as some message about Duke Robinson?
There is no correlation between the two other than someone on this forum liked one of them and someone else likes the other. Everyone on here falls in love with guys who fail. Even the stupid morons who don't have the sack to admit it.
I wouldn't take Cody in the 2nd round. No way, no shape, no how. You have to weigh risks vs rewards. I do not think his potential rewards outweigh the potential risks. If he was 40 pounds lighter, I might feel differently. Right now he looks like an unmotivated tub of goo well on his way to eating himself out of football. I do not spend a 2nd round pick on that.
Exactly. Well said.
Cody doesn't seem at all dedicated to working out and being in shape and putting in the work to be a great football player. He seems like the classic case of a guy whose gotten by his whole life on talent alone.
While that works out for some players (like Deion Sanders) it's a huge risk to take a guy who doesn't appear, from looking at him, that he has any motivation to put in the hard work to play football at the NFL level and just hope that magically he'll suddenly decide that he should be a hard worker.
Guys like this always scare me cause I don't believe it's a realistic possibility (I know there will be exceptions as there always are) to believe that a kid who doesn't appear to care about working hard his whole life, cause he's always just been more talented than those around him, will suddenly flip a switch and realise he's got to work super hard, all the time, to be productive in the NFL.
I will not be shocked, in the least, if Cody winds up out of the NFL in 3 years.

DAL @ GB
JAX
HOU