You don't think McNabb has been running a version of the West Coast offense his entire career?Vinnie2u;3333918 said:Isn't the west coast offense based on timing and accuracy? Mcflabb's best ball is the long ball.. I don't see a happy marriage.. Man the skins are really adding some ego's.. LJ, Portis, Moss, Mcflabb, Fat Albert....
DFWJC;3333928 said:You don't think McNabb has been running a version of the West Coast offense his entire career?
Longboysfan;3333939 said:I am not saying this will happen - but....
The last time this coach had an older QB... Elway
The Broncos had some of their best years. McNabb is a bit like Elway in regards to age and ability at the same point in their careers.
You never know.....
.
adbutcher;3333847 said:McNabb is a good QB but he ain't no Elway and it is not even close.
Vinnie2u;3333941 said:A version yes.. But how many balls does he bounce or go over the head of the receivers.. Macklin and Jackson are deep threats..
hawklegion;3333997 said:McNabb looked very bad at the end of the season loss to us. I think the Eagles knew he was over, and why not get something for him while also hurting your divison rival. If McNabb had something left in the tank, the Eagles would not have traded him in the division, to play the guy twice in a season. I think the Skins are just where they were with Campbell.
burmafrd;3333651 said:Their O line sucks; McFlabb is not as agile and fast as he was. By the time they improve their O line McFlabb is done.
AsthmaField;3333907 said:It will help the offense some, only because it has been Campbell that was holding back the Skins. McNabb is better than Campbell in any universe.
Still, Shanny is known for improving the offense and not doing much with the defense and here we are hearing that he tried to get the QB by trading the star DT.
Bottom line is: If Gibbs couldn't help the Danny led Skins, then I doubt Shanny will do much either.
burmafrd;3333651 said:Their O line sucks; McFlabb is not as agile and fast as he was. By the time they improve their O line McFlabb is done.
SkinsHokieFan;3334032 said:Lets be honest here (and its really Commanders fans that need to be honest) Gibbs, while a great leader who literally willed that team to the playoffs twice, was out of the game for a generation and had clearly let the game pass him by.
And he kept Vinny Cerrato and would have given Larry Johnson a 5 year guranteed deal
Compare that to Shanahan, who has only been out of the NFL for a year, and brought in his up and coming OC son to be OC in DC, and the circumstances are quite different.
While veterans have been signed, they have been smart stop gap moves with incentive laden deals that can allow the Commanders to easily cut non performers.
10 veterans released on the night before FA.
Along with that, the Shanahans have an actual sense of the modern NFL, seeing they have both coached in it, and didn't neccessarily "bring the band back together" like Gibbs 2.0 attempted.
Are there some similarities? Yea you bet, another savior in Washington. Are there quite a few differences? Oh yes
Doomsday101;3334001 said:Funny had Dallas played like that people would be saying the play calling sucked. Well I do think that was the case for Philly their play calling sucked. Dallas knew exactly what Reid was going to do
wileedog;3334044 said:Reid didn't overthrow a wide open Desean Jackson for what would have been a huge momentum swinging 70 yard TD in the first game. Or go a combined 39-73 passing. Or blame his young WRs after the first loss.
As other have said I think Philly knows exactly what they sent to Washington, and they are not particularly worried.
Doomsday101;3334047 said:No but they continue to try and attack deep as they did for most of the season and Dallas was not about to be beat by the deep ball. You are talking 1 pass that McNabb over threw I'm talking about and 2 entire game plans. Our coaches would have have caught hell and yet Reid gets a pass? Please give me a break, Reid was out coached and Dallas knew exactly what was coming and not only kicked Philly butt once but back to back.