Irvin88_4life
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,509
- Reaction score
- 26,396
Where did I say Romo wouldn't finish 1 drive? Nice try thoughGood to see that this has shifted from "Romo won't finish a drive". Still wrong, but less wrong.
Where did I say Romo wouldn't finish 1 drive? Nice try thoughGood to see that this has shifted from "Romo won't finish a drive". Still wrong, but less wrong.
Really let's see what Dak did against Detroit when Zeke didn't play......oh wait a minute that wouldn't fit the agenda though so we can't do that
Wasn't referring to you necessarily, but all the ridiculous statements about Romo not being able to finish a play or drive that were spewed all year.Where did I say Romo wouldn't finish 1 drive? Nice try though
Then we can drop the "without Zeke" because this has got nothing to do with Elliott. With Dak's record against elite defenses, I'd give Romo & McFadden the edge over Dak & Zeke, wouldn't you?
I said I have no faith in Romo finishing a game and still believe it. When he came into the game I was happy for him but was worried he was young to get smashed. Seemed like the team played much more harder to give Romo a great driveWasn't referring to you necessarily, but all the ridiculous statements about Romo not being able to finish a play or drive that were spewed all year.
Like Williams loafing on his first play or Fred missing a block on his second? No, they weren't really trying any harder.I said I have no faith in Romo finishing a game and still believe it. When he came into the game I was happy for him but was worried he was young to get smashed. Seemed like the team played much more harder to give Romo a great drive
Did Zeke play in the Browns game or not? Keep on with your agenda thoughDetroit has the 28th best defense in the league according to the Aikman Efficiency Ratings. Why not talk about how Dak did against the Browns? The only reason that Detroit even backed into the playoffs was because the Skins **** the bed the last 2 weeks. But hey, if that's what you want to hang your hat on - have at it.
Yes they were. Romo wasn't touched, while Dak and Sanchez was hit. Tell yourself whatever you want thoughLike Williams loafing on his first play or Fred missing a block on his second? No, they weren't really trying any harder.
Probably due to a pocket presence which neither of the other 2 have, not due to them trying any harder lol.Yes they were. Romo wasn't touched, while Dak and Sanchez was hit. Tell yourself whatever you want though
If you're basing a QB decision on the running backs, that's not even a QB decision.I really hope not, because Zeke is twice the player McFadden is. If we're actually better with Romo and McFadden, well then the coaches are freaking idiots.
Did Zeke play in the Browns game or not? Keep on with your agenda though
If you're basing a QB decision on the running backs, that's not even a QB decision.
"With Elliott out of the game, the offense was a fraction of what it normally was" rings hollow with people who saw how we moved the ball early without Elliott. Depending on how many possessions we get, we were on a pace for 350-400 yards and 27-30 points without Elliott until the #3 QB came in. So it sounds like either you didn't watch the game all that closely, or you're simply not being objective.
Somebody's bound to point out that kind of thing, so don't be surprised or take offense when it happens. All part of the give and take.
In no way is McFadden remotely as good as Zeke. The difference between them is night and day. If Romo is so much better than Dak that he overcomes that difference (and on a team that runs the ball more than 50 percent of the time) then they are definitely starting the wrong guy.
Really let's see what Dak did against Detroit when Zeke didn't play......oh wait a minute that wouldn't fit the agenda though so we can't do that
In the last series he played in we saw 1 of Dak's weaknesses compared to Romo - spotting the unblocked blitzer and making the adjustment. It got him hit pretty hard when the blitzer came in hard unblocked.
In his only series on the 2nd or 3rd pass he threw, not the TD pass, Romo spotted the blitzer, pointed him out and made the adjustment then cooly hit I think it was McFadden over the middle.
There ARE some things a 13 year vet is better at than a rookie at this point, and it's not even debatable.
Would be great if we have cap space to buy a couple good free agents. This team is on the cusp of greatness and has already grown through great drafting. 2 to 3 FA acquisitions and the young guns getting better may spell Dynasty. Not sure about keeping Carr but he does stay on the field so hes got that going for him
You're saying that the gap between Dak and Romo is so huge, that I must be trying to pull a fast one by including Tony's drive as part of our offensive production...and yet this gap between them is so small, that as long as Elliott plays, it doesn't matter which one is QB.In no way is McFadden remotely as good as Zeke. The difference between them is night and day. If Romo is so much better than Dak that he overcomes that difference (and on a team that runs the ball more than 50 percent of the time) then they are definitely starting the wrong guy.