ScipioCowboy
More than meets the eye.
- Messages
- 25,324
- Reaction score
- 17,682
Someone definitely needs to have a stern discussion with these cats, and make them understand in no uncertain terms that what nature has equipped them to do is unnatural.
TheCount;4987520 said:Of course, it's stupid if you refuse to read it. Vermin aren't the only animals being killed.
Did you even read the article?
ScipioCowboy;4987871 said:Someone definitely needs to have a stern discussion with these cats, and make them understand in no uncertain terms that what nature has equipped them to do is unnatural.
burmafrd;4987891 said:that is why this is a joke frankly. They are doing what they are meant to do and suddenly some here are whining and crying.
TheDallasDon;4987897 said:Animals kill other animals, its what they do.
burmafrd;4987890 said:do you ever think before you post?
ScipioCowboy;4987871 said:Someone definitely needs to have a stern discussion with these cats, and make them understand in no uncertain terms that what nature has equipped them to do is unnatural.
Romo 2 Austin;4987968 said:So? Should they eat grass?
ScipioCowboy;4987871 said:Someone definitely needs to have a stern discussion with these cats, and make them understand in no uncertain terms that what nature has equipped them to do is unnatural.
Hopeuhavechange;4987989 said:Cat Chow. Or make if Suzy Homemaker feels industrious she can whip something up.
Yet the new study estimates that free-roaming pets account for only about 29 percent of the birds and 11 percent of the mammals killed by domestic cats each year, and the real problem arises over how to manage the 80 million or so stray or feral cats that commit the bulk of the wildlife slaughter.
Hopeuhavechange;4987993 said:Points for being funny. But a plea for a little little clarity here. Nonnative species introduced into an ecosystem isn't natural. And, btw, a majority of kills are from stray cats living in their various colonies, some 40 million of whom are rounded up and euthanasized every year, lest they overwhelm the environment and broadly communicate diseases within the population and without (nature hard at work-- self-preservation being the 1st law of nature and pathogens are hardly excepted fr the law).
Faerluna;4988014 said:The only disease that cats and humans are remotely likely to share is Toxoplasmosis. The last confirmed case of cat to human rabies transmission was 35 years ago and cats are very unlikely to have rabies in general.
And the amount of animals, in particular birds, that are killed by urban sprawl and flying into buildings far outweighs the number killed by cats. Nobody wants to try to track that, though, because you really can't. Just like this article. You can take a small sample of cats vs prey and show the data any way you like and call it accurate.
If cats were truly killing that many birds, there would be a significant drop off in population and dead birds laying around in vast quantities. But there aren't, because it's simply propaganda.
Not to mention, cats are more likely to kill the sick and the older, more compromised birds that a healthy bird.
As someone that takes care of lots of feral cats for going on a decade, the amount of animals killed by cats is far smaller than articles of this nature portray.
TheCount;4988007 said:lol, I didn't think that was a serious question but I could be wrong. Cats don't even eat what they kill for the most part. If they did, that number would be a lot lower.
Teren_Kanan;4987631 said:What else are they killing? Vermin are the only ones I saw listed in the article. Rabbits, Birds, Moles, Shrews, Chipmunks, Snakes, Bugs, lizards, frogs and voles. Did I miss some non vermin?
Hopeuhavechange;4988036 said:right very few cats consume their kill. ferals must be an exception. otherwise...