Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,082
- Reaction score
- 38,714
Overall I’d agree with this but not sure SF is the model to follow. They’ve actually had prob one of the weaker groups of QB’s for a team in champ games and SB’s during this run . And I’m still not sold they have one of the better QB’s.Lance probably isn’t the answer, I agree. But can we also agree if we don’t try something new, why would we expect different results?
I fully realize Jerry is going to extend Dak. And I think Dak is a good QB. I have fullly supported him for the last 8 years. Most of the team’s failures are not all on him. But I also believe Jerry hangs on to guys too long. He did with Romo and he’s doing it now. It’s time to move on IMO. I think a team like Pitts that has a good team and needs a QB might be a good trade. Or even a team like Sea who has a new coach and has been searching for a QB.
The Cowboys have had only 2 starting QBs in the last 18 seasons. The 49ers have had 8 starting QBs in that same period and two of those QBs who aren’t there anymore each won an NFC championship and took them to two different SBs. Good organizations recognize when it’s time to go another direction.
I see them as one of the greater teams this era without a great QB. And maybe why they continue churning them out. Injuries have also played a role.
I also don’t think you change just to change. But our problem is we don’t continue to draft QB’s which SF did. Some didn’t work out but they kept trying.
Especially in Cap era we should be drafting QB’s regularly. If nothing else you have trade bait. But it’s obvious why we don’t hear. Our owner doesn’t want the controversy. Cause it can prove he’s wrong. And he’d rather lose than proved wrong.