Kiper Just Said

But the internet geniuses and Mel Kiper know more than Bill and Ireland.

Just ask them
 
I can't believe people are actually stressing over something Mel Kiper said!!...Too Funny!.....He's nothing more than some scumbag that knows useless details of every player's life.......Who would you have more trust in?....Parcells or Kiper?....Enough said!.....Now the draft is over, he can go back to Vegas and make his living as an Elvis impersonator w/ that roadkill
on his head!.....lol
 
X-Dawg said:
Grasp? I've been a Cowboys fan longer then you've been alive - - There was no need for Hananam then and a waste of CAP space. Change in offense? what would that be? You really buy a change? Jerry said that b/c he had nothing else to say . There's no change, we lost LA and we IMO we still cannot run the football b/c we lack the headbangers required up front -WHICH BRINGS ME TO my next point Carpenter was another poor pick when the obvious need was Nick Mangold. We have not had a true top flight horse in the middle since Step and old man Donaldson. IMO Center and Safety is where we should have gone.

Discuss...."no offense"
Click to expand...
Glad you don't work for the Cowboys.
 
Dale said:
The irony is many would have loved Ko Simpson in the second round, calling it a "value" pick, yet he's a guy that slid all the way to Day 2.
Click to expand...
Obviously teams put much more value on his wonderlic score than average fans did. It really doesn't matter what round he went in, his questionable intelligence level will always hold him back.
 
tomo817 said:
Why is that Big Dog???
Click to expand...
Ummmmmmm did you read what he said? His 2 posts are really off the mark. No need for Hannam? Carpenter a poor pick? Obvious need was Mangold? Safety is where we should have gone? Clearly his perspective of our roster isn't mainsteam thinking.
 
I also don't understand the Fasano. To me it didn't make sense. No matter what people think or say, we have BIGGER needs than TE in the second round. Could have gotten a tackle at that point. McNeil was still there Winston was there. To me spending a 2nd round pick on a TE when you have Witten and signed Hannam just doesn't make sense. Do you guy realise that we used a higher pick to get Fasano then we did to get Witten?

Now I don't think it's the end of the world but they could have gone in another direction.
 
heir said:
I also don't understand the Fasano. To me it didn't make sense. No matter what people think or say, we have BIGGER needs than TE in the second round. Could have gotten a tackle at that point. McNeil was still there Winston was there. To me spending a 2nd round pick on a TE when you have Witten and signed Hannam just doesn't make sense. Do you guy realise that we used a higher pick to get Fasano then we did to get Witten?

Now I don't think it's the end of the world but they could have gone in another direction.
Click to expand...


Forget it. Jerry Jones has his blind masses enthralled already.

Never question authority. Let the experts do their job. Jerry Jones is in control.

Believe in Jerry Jones ... cuz he never lies.

We're going with a 2 TE set on every single play now. That gives us more weapons to choose from. Wow ... that just leaves one less FB to block the onrush of defenders crashing through our leaky OL.

But that doesn't matter ... we're going to a 2 TE system. Heck, I have a better idea ... let's go with a 4 TE system. That'll really confuse the heck out of our opponents.
 
ComicBookGuy said:
Amazing how poor Wonderlic scores holds some players back but not others...
Click to expand...
I think it depends on the position they play. Simpson plays FS and would be the one making all the calls on D for alignments and so on. Just like a QB who struggles reading defenses, most teams thought Simpson would struggle with his assignments.
 
heir said:
I also don't understand the Fasano. To me it didn't make sense. No matter what people think or say, we have BIGGER needs than TE in the second round.
Click to expand...
Did you hear JJ or Ireland talking about our offense and the reason we picked Fasano? If you didn't, I can understand why you question the pick. If you did, that should explain everything.
 
Yeah they want to go 2 TEs more and all that. Well that's the same thing I heard as the reason they signed Hannam.
 
heir said:
Yeah they want to go 2 TEs more and all that. Well that's the same thing I heard as the reason they signed Hannam.
Click to expand...

And that was the reason. Ireland stated that Hannam was signed as insurance in case they weren't able to get one of the TE's they wanted in the draft.
 
heir said:
Yeah they want to go 2 TEs more and all that. Well that's the same thing I heard as the reason they signed Hannam.
Click to expand...

They want to make it our base offense. not just play it more and "all that"
 
so you guys don't question the pick at all? When you first saw the pick you guys were all for it?
 
X-Dawg said:
No Kiper is dead on - Dallas missed the boat on Draft Day - we had and still have a massive hole at cover safety - Fasano was an asinine choice.
Click to expand...

Who pissed on your Cheerios?
 
Portland Fanatic said:
Maybe he's not sold on Watkins...

Curious...how many here are sold on Watkins? Have not seen enough to make any judgements....
Click to expand...

I like the guy, I'll say this ... the kids got alot of tools to work with, doesn't always show up on the field but if it did we don't get him at that spot. Good value in my opinion, hopefully a guy Parcells can coach up.
 
heir said:
so you guys don't question the pick at all? When you first saw the pick you guys were all for it?
Click to expand...

when we first saw it we didnt notice the upside because we were all stuck on getting a OLB/FS/OL in the first 3 rounds, and didnt even have a TE in mind. what we realized was hannam can not play the 2nd TE spot in the 2TE set. so you look at it and not only dos Fasano give us the right player for the TE spot but also helps out at FB and WR . . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 119 more.
Total: 5,701 (members: 219, guests: 5,482)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,162
Messages
13,855,420
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top