Lack of weapons will limit playoff success!

Irv88

Well-Known Member
Messages
367
Reaction score
1,339
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Hoping the defense can carry and hoping for the best.

Go cowboys!
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,037
Reaction score
19,228
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Go cowboys!

For the 90th time, the decision wasn't Gallup or Cooper. When they took Lamb in the 1st rd, they knew they couldn't keep two top paid receivers at the position. Lamb may get close to 30 million this offseason. Who would you rather have Cooper or Lamb?
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,610
Reaction score
21,809
For the 90th time, the decision wasn't Gallup or Cooper. When they took Lamb in the 1st rd, they knew they couldn't keep two top paid receivers at the position. Lamb may get close to 30 million this offseason. Who would you rather have Cooper or Lamb?
Oh, the top offensive player and the top defensive player will both be given huge contracts shortly.
 

Hadenough

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,498
Reaction score
12,813
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Hoping the defense can carry and hoping for the best.

Go cowboys!

They couldn't do it when they had the weapons and the reason is someone didn't know how to find and use them all during the game to make them effective.
 

Pass2Run

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,870
Reaction score
12,220
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Hoping the defense can carry and hoping for the best.

I almost thought you left out Brown. But, their production last week was a result of their top-notch QB and creative scheme, especially if you look at the plays that got Brown his 151 yards.
 

Pass2Run

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,870
Reaction score
12,220
For the 90th time, the decision wasn't Gallup or Cooper. When they took Lamb in the 1st rd, they knew they couldn't keep two top paid receivers at the position. Lamb may get close to 30 million this offseason. Who would you rather have Cooper or Lamb?
Lamb. More versatile, younger, higher ceiling. You could get the same production out of a player like Gallup with that scheme.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,034
Reaction score
47,423
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Hoping the defense can carry and hoping for the best.

Go cowboys!

Agreed, except Amari Cooper refused to take a pay cut. That's why he was traded to the Browns.
 

ThatJerryKid

cowboys31
Messages
3,193
Reaction score
7,423
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Hoping the defense can carry and hoping for the best.

Go cowboys!

Bro, we got Martavis Bryant.
 

Gangsta Spanksta

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,818
Reaction score
8,816
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Hoping the defense can carry and hoping for the best.

Go cowboys!

How we ever gonna pay for Dak's contract if we keep talent around him?
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,610
Reaction score
21,809

Week 10: Home vs New York Giants​

Prediction: Win (6-3)

Week 11: @ Carolina Panthers​

Prediction: Win (7-3)

Week 12: vs Washington Commanders (Thanksgiving)​

Prediction: Win (8-3)

Week 13: vs Seattle Seahawks​

Prediction: Win (9-3)

Week 14: Home vs Philadelphia Eagles​

Prediction: Win (10-3)

Week 15: @ Buffalo Bills​

Prediction: Win (11-3)

Week 16: @ Miami Dolphins​

Prediction: Loss (11-4)

Week 17: Home vs Detroit Lions​

Prediction: Win (12-4)

Week 18: @ Washington Commanders​

Prediction: Win (13-4)
https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/lists/cowboys-9-remaining-games-2023-win-loss-prediction/
 

JD_KaPow

jimnabby
Messages
11,049
Reaction score
10,812
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
For the 90th time, the decision wasn't Gallup or Cooper. When they took Lamb in the 1st rd, they knew they couldn't keep two top paid receivers at the position. Lamb may get close to 30 million this offseason. Who would you rather have Cooper or Lamb?
I'd rather have Cooper this year than a 5th-round pick (Matt Waletzko) and worry about that issue next offseason.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
45,610
Reaction score
21,809
The lack of weapons excuse is lame. History over the past 27 years exhibits the Cowboys just don't win in the post season, no matter what their weapons look like.
Let's just here and now deal with your statement. You are declaring my Dallas Cowboys losers! :thumbdown: :popcorn:
 

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,279
Reaction score
3,152
For the 90th time, the decision wasn't Gallup or Cooper. When they took Lamb in the 1st rd, they knew they couldn't keep two top paid receivers at the position. Lamb may get close to 30 million this offseason. Who would you rather have Cooper or Lamb?
Except it is 2 years until Lamb becomes a "top paid receiver". Even if he gets his contract today the next 2 years are his rookie deal. 2 years from now, Cooper is in the last year of his deal. It was never Cooper or Lamb. It was Cooper or Gallup and they picked the latter and that looks it did not work out because Gallup has forgotten how to catch the ball, and sadly Cooks is not fairing much better.
 
Top