Lack of weapons will limit playoff success!

Mannix

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,948
Reaction score
11,276
Three words are all you need to know...."Dak locks in".....he sees about 1/10th of the field ahead of him.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,598
Reaction score
19,864
Except it is 2 years until Lamb becomes a "top paid receiver". Even if he gets his contract today the next 2 years are his rookie deal. 2 years from now, Cooper is in the last year of his deal. It was never Cooper or Lamb. It was Cooper or Gallup and they picked the latter and that looks it did not work out because Gallup has forgotten how to catch the ball, and sadly Cooks is not fairing much better.
They needed to resign Dak and resign a few others. Cooper was making 20 million per season
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,737
Reaction score
22,461
In the playoffs, our Cowboys, a resounding YES!
No sir, I wouldn't call that being a fan. I will never put the Cowboys in the level as Casey at the Bat...no matter the damn excuses offered to the contrary. I live or die by loyalty to the team...not just chest medals. They always earn this fan's respect. They stay in harm's way and not for my amusement and insults. They still play for us.

Not quite halfway and they already are accountable with us fans for this very season. Either root or at least follow them.
 

Tussinman

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,331
Reaction score
3,982
For the 90th time, the decision wasn't Gallup or Cooper. When they took Lamb in the 1st rd, they knew they couldn't keep two top paid receivers at the position. Lamb may get close to 30 million this offseason. Who would you rather have Cooper or Lamb?
That's actually isn't true. Lambs first high cap year won't be till 2026. Thats not why they didn't keep Cooper 2022 to 2024, it wasn't about them predicting a hypothetical deal 4 years from when he was traded two years of which past the point of him even being under contract.
Except it is 2 years until Lamb becomes a "top paid receiver". Even if he gets his contract today the next 2 years are his rookie deal. 2 years from now, Cooper is in the last year of his deal. It was never Cooper or Lamb. It was Cooper or Gallup and they picked the latter and that looks it did not work out because Gallup has forgotten how to catch the ball, and sadly Cooks is not fairing much better.
If I'm not mistaking the average combined annual value of Gallup deal and Cooks deal is actually on par if not higher than Cooper's base rate

Yeah I'm not buying "can't afford him cowboys are broke". Also not buying the oh you can't have two number ones narrative, especially when you knowingly have a quarterback that has a history of not elevating mid tier and below wideouts...... (If anything that is reason to have 2 high level receivers)
 

Tussinman

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,331
Reaction score
3,982
They needed to resign Dak and resign a few others. Cooper was making 20 million per season
His point was they still spent that 20 million they just spent it on two receivers that everybody's complaining about.

Or you could have just kept the guy that you knew was really good and played really well with Lamb...... (This whole "oh they're poor and they don't have enough cap money" isn't why he's gone
 

BHendri5

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,100
Reaction score
1,379
lack of weapons? did you hit your head? we have an abundance of weapons, probably too much
 

nobody

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,810
Reaction score
19,297
It's not the amount of "weapons" that's the limit. It's the lack of intestinal fortitude of the entire team that's the limiting factor in the playoffs. They choke.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
61,530
Reaction score
38,882
Give me Amari Cooper and Cedric Wilson over Brandon Cooks, and Michael Gallup.
 

Jarntt

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,939
Reaction score
6,550
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Hoping the defense can carry and hoping for the best.

Go cowboys!

If only we had kept Noah Brown we’d be undefeated…
 

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,029
We had the guys too!

The playoffs show your weaknesses.


Lamb, Cooper and shultz were the 1,3 and 4 leaders in receiving yards this week.

Good chance were are gonna feel this when the playoffs come. Chiefs are in the same boat (limited weapons). Extending gallup over cooper was bananas.

Hoping the defense can carry and hoping for the best.

Go cowboys!

Lamb isn’t our only weapon. We have plenty of weapons. We just need to use them correctly.
 

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,890
Reaction score
3,701
They needed to resign Dak and resign a few others. Cooper was making 20 million per season
And they easily could do that. Right now Cooks+Gallup cost more than Cooper when right now a 1-2-3 of Lamb-Cooper-Tolbert would be far better.

However, to double down, plenty of teams have one paid WR with a paid QB. That is not a serious threat.
 

Hadenough

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,992
Reaction score
13,446

Week 10: Home vs New York Giants​

Prediction: Win (6-3)

Week 11: @ Carolina Panthers​

Prediction: Win (7-3)

Week 12: vs Washington Commanders (Thanksgiving)​

Prediction: Win (8-3)

Week 13: vs Seattle Seahawks​

Prediction: Win (9-3)

Week 14: Home vs Philadelphia Eagles​

Prediction: Win (10-3)

Week 15: @ Buffalo Bills​

Prediction: Win (11-3)

Week 16: @ Miami Dolphins​

Prediction: Loss (11-4)

Week 17: Home vs Detroit Lions​

Prediction: Win (12-4)

Week 18: @ Washington Commanders​

Prediction: Win (13-4)
https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/lists/cowboys-9-remaining-games-2023-win-loss-prediction/
I don't see them beating the bills, lions, seahawks, dolphins, eagles and commanders steal the last game of the season.
 

lopey

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,424
Reaction score
3,136
No moves at trade deadline even though we need a running back will cost us imo
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,598
Reaction score
19,864
And they easily could do that. Right now Cooks+Gallup cost more than Cooper when right now a 1-2-3 of Lamb-Cooper-Tolbert would be far better.

However, to double down, plenty of teams have one paid WR with a paid QB. That is not a serious threat.
You are forgetting players like Shultz who was tagged as well
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,598
Reaction score
19,864
His point was they still spent that 20 million they just spent it on two receivers that everybody's complaining about.

Or you could have just kept the guy that you knew was really good and played really well with Lamb...... (This whole "oh they're poor and they don't have enough cap money" isn't why he's gone
Cooper also went to the media and complained about the coaching staff.
 

GoCowboysGo

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,013
Reaction score
2,106
the Cowboys have plenty of weapons, save for maybe running backs. What’s lacking is the trenches, and terrible luck with injuries.
 
Top