Add one more from somebody who was there Saturday. His elusiveness had us buzzing.
Not sure why people think that Dunbar and 'Lache' Seastrunck can't be a competitive RB. One is 5-9 and 200 and the other is 5-8 and 195+. Emmitt played at 208. Granted he was built differently with huge legs but he wasn't that fast either. The others have more of a sprinter/RB lower body that translates more into speed. But they aren't that different in build. Both of them are fast and hit the hole well. They might no be able to carry the ball 15+ times a game (although they may) but they offer some versatility and depth IMO. Dorsett was 5-10 (with light gravity) and weighed 195 near the end. He played substantially less on entry into the league.
If you can break arm tackles in this league, have good balance and vision, catch the ball, and block then generally there is a place to play. It's the rest of the things that make a very good or better RB.
Ok, cat's out of the bag. You are now under notice to give up more info.
I wish I had some insight, but I took my three boys (8, 9, and 14), so I was watching most of it through their eyes, if that makes any sense. I can tell you Haley had a blast, and was talking to everybody. The whole TC fan experience has changed a lot since the last time I went several years ago. I'll post more on it when I get some time to reflect.
Where did you hear that? I heard he was the best pass protector as a RB on the team. Is it standard these days to find ways to criticize Murray even to the point of making it up?
I wish I had some insight, but I took my three boys (8, 9, and 14), so I was watching most of it through their eyes, if that makes any sense. I can tell you Haley had a blast, and was talking to everybody. The whole TC fan experience has changed a lot since the last time I went several years ago. I'll post more on it when I get some time to reflect.
As a Baylor fan I'd love for Seastrunk to earn a spot on the roster. I'm not confident though. It's going to come down to blocking and special teams play. It's not as much that he couldn't block or catch at Baylor as much as it isn't something Baylor running backs are asked to do.
His best trait is his ability to get to full speed almost instantly out of a cut. His top speed is only good compared to his elite acceleration.
I don't know what Dunbar is making off hand but that may be Seastrunk ' best shot at making the roster. He needs to provide what Dunbar dues at a cheaper price.
Not sure why people think that Dunbar and 'Lache' Seastrunck can't be a competitive RB. One is 5-9 and 200 and the other is 5-8 and 195+. Emmitt played at 208. Granted he was built differently with huge legs but he wasn't that fast either. The others have more of a sprinter/RB lower body that translates more into speed. But they aren't that different in build. Both of them are fast and hit the hole well. They might no be able to carry the ball 15+ times a game (although they may) but they offer some versatility and depth IMO. Dorsett was 5-10 (with light gravity) and weighed 195 near the end. He played substantially less on entry into the league.
If you can break arm tackles in this league, have good balance and vision, catch the ball, and block then generally there is a place to play. It's the rest of the things that make a very good or better RB.
Dorsett was 177 when he entered the league.
Not sure why people think that Dunbar and 'Lache' Seastrunck can't be a competitive RB. One is 5-9 and 200 and the other is 5-8 and 195+. Emmitt played at 208. Granted he was built differently with huge legs but he wasn't that fast either. The others have more of a sprinter/RB lower body that translates more into speed. But they aren't that different in build. Both of them are fast and hit the hole well. They might no be able to carry the ball 15+ times a game (although they may) but they offer some versatility and depth IMO. Dorsett was 5-10 (with light gravity) and weighed 195 near the end. He played substantially less on entry into the league.
If you can break arm tackles in this league, have good balance and vision, catch the ball, and block then generally there is a place to play. It's the rest of the things that make a very good or better RB.
I think it's everything else that is the issue. Blocking, vision, ball security, that sort of stuff. Not saying it's a problem with those two guys, but there's a lot more to the running back position than running the ball.
So is Dunbar.
I just don't think there game translates to actual football very well.
If it was flag football they would be my first 2 selections..
Warrick Dunn, Darren Sproles, Maurice Jones-Drew all say hi.
I meant the players themselves.. Not their physical attributes.
RB's come in all shapes and sizes as we all know.