Longboysfan
hipfake08
- Messages
- 13,322
- Reaction score
- 5,800
Doomsday101;4490268 said:
And most likely through 2070......
Doomsday101;4490268 said:
Sam I Am;4491443 said:The Masters is a PGA event. If they (Augusta) hold a non-PGA, non-sponsored event, it won't be The Masters.
Roll forward. Someone has to supply the winnings. If nobody sponsors an even, they it must be funded privately. Now tell me. How long do you think that is going to last? Not long. You under estimate the power of big business. If public outcry demands that big business not sponsor an event, they will stop or lose business. If big business doesn't sponsor the event, that event will eventually fold.
So, as a pro golfer. (especially one that doesn't win very often.) Do you go play Augusta for chump change or do you go play a PGA event that pays very well? Especially of the top golfers go play Augusta that year?
If people demand it, it will happen.
Cythim;4491353 said:The problem in this specific case comes with the implied business transactions happening within the club itself. IBM is now at a disadvantage if their female CEO cannot get into the club and rub elbows with other members of the business elite. I really cannot speculate how much of a disadvantage it truly is, but it represents the hardships women face in obtaining and remaining in positions of power.
Doomsday101;4491378 said:But in the end Augusta does not serve the community they do not get tax payer money they have the right to determine their membership which as I have stated is at 300 members. IBM as a sponsor of the Masters clearly has the right to not sponsor it but they don't have the right to force Augusta to change their strict policy on its membership.
burmafrd;4491402 said:oh wah wah wah
it that is the best case you can make its pathetic
SkinsandTerps;4491566 said:It would be a disadvantage if it was deemed as a business meeting perhaps. It is indeed entertainment and also a private club. If I am not in that club so be it. There are plenty of folks that can not go to my course...they are not members of the private club.
arglebargle;4491305 said:Commerce Clause allows the federal government to mess with pretty much anything. It's another example of why we should always be leary of broadly based law enacted in a time of crisis.
casmith07;4490985 said:Gender based discrimination is illegal, but the "private club" good ole boys network style of control is still somehow allowed to be above the law.
Doomsday101;4490264 said:That would be nice as well. I would just love one time to play at that course. Not going to happen.
MetalHead;4491798 said:Go try to join an all female fitness center.
Those places are private enterprises.
They have the right to deny you entry/membership based on gender.
Are they too above the law?
viman96;4491813 said:I'm not sure The Masters is a PGA event. I believe the PGA Tour recognizes it as one of the Four Majors and goes towards points and official stats.
viman96;4491813 said:I'm not sure The Masters is a PGA event. I believe the PGA Tour recognizes it as one of the Four Majors and goes towards points and official stats.
Sam I Am;4491831 said:It is an official PGA Tour event, but I incorrectly stated that it was owned by the PGA. It was created by Augusta Golf Club.
Of course that will won't change the fact that if public outcry was strong enough, the PGA and it's players would not play the Masters.
The30YardSlant;4491069 said:Doesn't matter, it's a private club that has the right to refuse membership to anyone for any reason they see fit.
What anybody thinks about it is totally irrelevant and not really worth discussing IMO. It's no different than private female gyms which refuse membership to men.
CanadianCowboysFan;4491987 said:there might be safety issues re the latter
just because something is private doesn't mean it can discriminate, I privately own a building, should I be allowed not to rent to blacks or hispanics?
CanadianCowboysFan;4491987 said:there might be safety issues re the latter
just because something is private doesn't mean it can discriminate, I privately own a building, should I be allowed not to rent to blacks or hispanics?