Let's talk about Jason Garrett..

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
Use Your Illusion;2375019 said:
Frankly.. the offense hasn't been very good since about week 3 of this season and I'm starting to wonder if Garrett is the wonderkid we all thought he was.

Week 6- 374 net yards, 24 points
Week 5- 373 net yards, 31 points
Week 4- 344 net yards, 24 points

Week 3- 453, 27
Week 2- 380, 34
Week 1- 487, 28

I'd say the offense went from Great, to good, to terrible without the QB. Garret is fine, leave it be.
 

AlcoholicNinja

Wasted but Deadly
Messages
477
Reaction score
1
Use Your Illusion;2375019 said:
Because today's offensive performance was pretty pathetic.

As was last week's.

Frankly.. the offense hasn't been very good since about week 3 of this season and I'm starting to wonder if Garrett is the wonderkid we all thought he was.

The defense played FANTASTIC today and it was almost all for nothing because of Garrett's offense.

I know you're sitting there waiting to tell me how awful Brad Johnson is and how the offense will be much better when Tony Romo gets back.

So, I ask you this.. if all we need is Romo to get back, then why even employ Garrett? What difference does he really make? I'm starting to think that this is a guy who, unless he has an all-pro at every position, really can't field the kind of dominant offense he had last year.

Or maybe he can, but if he's going to be our head coach next year he better start showing it soon. Because I'd just as soon rather have a creative mind who uses all the weapons at his disposal and can still get the job done whether one of them is missing or not.


:loser:
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
BigDFan5;2375115 said:
15684045_400x400.jpg


......
 

CaptainAmerica

Active Member
Messages
5,030
Reaction score
26
Our offensive coaches should be aware the Barber is wearing down. He needs to rotate to some extent with another back.

I haven't seen the play chart but on the last drive it was almost exclusively Barber and he was tired.
 

StylisticS

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,754
Reaction score
6,128
DaBoys4Life;2375089 said:
Fire Garrett...it's not as if TO hasn't been struggling all season....one trick pony Garrett....

You need a cluepon.
 

Kaika

Have a Good Day Pilgrims
Messages
2,697
Reaction score
0
CaptainAmerica;2375151 said:
Our offensive coaches should be aware the Barber is wearing down. He needs to rotate to some extent with another back.

I haven't seen the play chart but on the last drive it was almost exclusively Barber and he was tired.

I'm sorry he was tired but we needed that game in the worst way and if he Wants to be the Man he has to step up (which he did) in games like this.
 

StylisticS

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,754
Reaction score
6,128
DaBoys4Life;2375157 said:
I love how all the problems go away with a win.
it doesn't. It's just observing that he improved in this game over the past two weeks and most of the problems on offense in this game was not due to Garrett's playcalling but Brad being the qb.
 

Kaika

Have a Good Day Pilgrims
Messages
2,697
Reaction score
0
DaBoys4Life;2375157 said:
I love how all the problems go away with a win.
Not sure what game you were watching. There are still alot of problems with this team . But it's probably easier to fix them after a win.
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
DaBoys4Life;2375157 said:
I love how all the problems go away with a win.

Garrett hasn't been the problem, I dont see any we love Wade threads, no we love Stewart threads, no yay bruce read threads
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
I have my doubts about Ginger Jason, but I will give him a pass for today. Johnson flat out sucks. He has to wind up like Nolan Ryan to throw the ball 10 yards.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
I don't give Jason Garrett a free pass because Brad Johnson is the quarterback, because the only reason Brad Johnson is in Dallas is because he's "Jason's guy". And for all the crap Parcells got for bringing in Vinny and Bledsoe, those guys look like Dan Marino compared to what we've witnessed the last two weeks. I'm not sure we've seen back-to-back performances like this from the QB position since Quincy's rookie year.
 

Ren

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,218
Reaction score
1,944
Use Your Illusion;2375019 said:
Because today's offensive performance was pretty pathetic.

As was last week's.

No QB, pleas tell me what he could have done better when your QB barely has enough arm to throw a check down :bang2:
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
This game shows why the NFL is based on QB play. The better the QB, the more likely your team is going to win games. For years the Colts defense has been pathetic, even giving up over 5 yards a carry and not being able to sack the QB, but Peyton Manning was so good that it was still routine for the Colts to win 12 or 13 games in a season. Now Peyton isn't having the greatest of seasons and the Colts are not likely to make the playoffs.

The offense has been setting team records under Garrett. It's a bit hard to judge the impact on Romo since he only started 10 games under Parcells, but with Garrett the offense has still improved.

I can't see judging Garrett on today's game given Johnson couldn't hit the broad side of a barn from anything 10+ yards out. Any opposing defense can defend that quite easily and that would handcuff any offensive coordinator.





YAKUZA
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
InmanRoshi;2375206 said:
I don't give Jason Garrett a free pass because Brad Johnson is the quarterback, because the only reason Brad Johnson is in Dallas is because he's "Jason's guy". And for all the crap Parcells got for bringing in Vinny and Bledsoe, those guys look like Dan Marino compared to what we've witnessed the last two weeks. I'm not sure we've seen back-to-back performances like this from the QB position since Quincy's rookie year.

Hutchinson was far worse.

And when was Brad Johnson "Jason's guy." I thought he was a Jerry/Wade signing from day one.






YAKUZA
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
Yakuza Rich;2375287 said:
Hutchinson was far worse.

And when was Brad Johnson "Jason's guy." I thought he was a Jerry/Wade signing from day one.






YAKUZA

I don't see how Hutchinson could be "far" worse. Throw away the garbage TD at the end of the game last week, and Johnson's stats are atrocious. How can you be far worse than zero?

Brad came here from his together with Garrett in Tampa in 2004.

Johnson told team officials he believed he could start in the NFL.

Denver and Dallas expressed the most interest. And each has a young quarterback as starter – Dallas with Romo and Denver with Jay Cutler.

Johnson elected to sign with Dallas because he has a good relationship with offensive coordinator Jason Garrett and receivers coach Ray Sherman. Johnson was Garrett's teammate with Tampa Bay in 2004. Sherman was Johnson's quarterbacks coach from 1995 to 1997 when he played in Minnesota.

"I had a very good connection with Jason Garrett coming in there as a coordinator," Johnson said. "I had a past with Ray Sherman, and I just thought it was a great fit more than anything else."

http://www.cowboysplus.com/topstory/stories/030607cpjohnson.21f86e88.html
 

ghosttown cowboy

Wyoming's #1 boys fan
Messages
1,440
Reaction score
860
Cajuncowboy;2375051 said:
Asking garrett to be great with BJ at QB is like asking Michael Phelps to win the gold with an anchor tied to arse.

Exactly...BJ and I mean that literally is the worst QB in the history of the NFL
 

Ender

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,970
Reaction score
515
Use Your Illusion;2375019 said:
Because today's offensive performance was pretty pathetic.

As was last week's.

Frankly.. the offense hasn't been very good since about week 3 of this season and I'm starting to wonder if Garrett is the wonderkid we all thought he was.

The defense played FANTASTIC today and it was almost all for nothing because of Garrett's offense.

I know you're sitting there waiting to tell me how awful Brad Johnson is and how the offense will be much better when Tony Romo gets back.

So, I ask you this.. if all we need is Romo to get back, then why even employ Garrett? What difference does he really make? I'm starting to think that this is a guy who, unless he has an all-pro at every position, really can't field the kind of dominant offense he had last year.

Or maybe he can, but if he's going to be our head coach next year he better start showing it soon. Because I'd just as soon rather have a creative mind who uses all the weapons at his disposal and can still get the job done whether one of them is missing or not.


your not serious right. This is the dumbest paost ive read in a while. Be happy with the win and stop this crying
 
Top