Let's talk offensive line needs

Where does he get drafted?

I see him as one of those guys that could play OT or OG.

He is a sophomore that is now thought of as possible top 10 selection.
He is not viewed as an OG but as a franchise OT. --may have to play RT early.
 
I guess I'm an idiot because I'd be on board with this as I think sustain drives to keep the opposing offense off the field and building early leads improves the defense. But my support is qualified: only if the draft board warrants it. I'm a proponent of BPA but if an OL and DL are ranked similarly, I likely go with the DL for some of the aforementioned reasons.
 
I guess I'm an idiot because I'd be on board with this as I think sustain drives to keep the opposing offense off the field and building early leads improves the defense. But my support is qualified: only if the draft board warrants it. I'm a proponent of BPA but if an OL and DL are ranked similarly, I likely go with the DL for some of the aforementioned reasons.

Time of possession means zero if the other team is scoring at will.

Long, time-consuming drives are sweet. Loved it versus the Bears.
Except their short, brutal 15 yards a play drives were more efficient, more effective and more deadly.

We lost by a mile.
 
He is a sophomore that is now thought of as possible top 10 selection.
He is not viewed as an OG but as a franchise OT. --may have to play RT early.
There are now several OL that are projected to go top 20. I think some of them go lower.

I used the Guard reference as a way that the Cowboys could more easily justify taking an OT. They played Flozell at OG originally.
 
Time of possession means zero if the other team is scoring at will.

Long, time-consuming drives are sweet. Loved it versus the Bears.
Except their short, brutal 15 yards a play drives were more efficient, more effective and more deadly.

We lost by a mile.

Love fifteen. ;)
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,016
Messages
14,506,851
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top