Lions Exploring Trading Suh - Would You Want Him?

HappyOnions

Datwin
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2,106
As much as this team needs attitude, this team DOES not need the salary that he would command nor can they afford to lose any draft picks that would be needed to acquire him.
 

Nova

Ntegrase96
Messages
10,701
Reaction score
12,659
No. It's a good question, but there aren't many positives, when you really look at it.

His contract is up after next year and would be very expensive to retain.

He plays the same position as Melton, and while it's not a given that Hannibal Henry will come through, he's the most cost effective option and when healthy isn't a far cry from Suh on the field.
 

DTown214

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,814
Reaction score
2,887
Suh seems like a guy we'd sign for cheap once he's washed up in a few more years... As of now, I wouldn't give up a first for him though for sure
 

DoctorChicken

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,299
Reaction score
18,366
Didnt stop Jerry bringin in TO with Parcells here.

TO was just a loudmouth whiner baby. Suh is dirty.

imo, a little bit of nastiness is fine for a DLineman. These are guys whose job is literally to shove people. But I think Suh's nastiness crosses the line for Garrett and Booger.
 

Setackin

radioactivecowboy88
Messages
3,858
Reaction score
4,612
For a 3rd and either a 3rd or 4th next yr depending on performance/behavior. Im in anything more then no.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
TO was just a loudmouth whiner baby. Suh is dirty.

imo, a little bit of nastiness is fine for a DLineman. These are guys whose job is literally to shove people. But I think Suh's nastiness crosses the line for Garrett and Booger.

yes dirty but getting kicked out of game taking big 15 yarders and now having the league watching him very close for any infraction may be a bit too much for a lot of teams. Dallas does enough stupid things to hurt themselfs really not sure trading for king stupid is a great idea
 
Top